Guest guest Posted March 12, 2004 Report Share Posted March 12, 2004 In a message dated 3/12/04 9:58:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, jokel3@... writes: > Strictly speaking, a scientist would > make no claim on the nature of soul, mind, consciousness, beauty, > truth, love, the good, etc... because he or she would admit to having > no scientific way of evaluating such a claim. I partially disagree. Mind and consciousness can be scientifically evaluated, and have been scientifically studied. _The Blank Slate_ is an excellent book on the scientific study of human nature, but some of this stuff you'd find in any Psych 101 class. If we define the mind as the conscious part of the human, and the part that thinks and remembers, it is clearly open to scientific study. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2004 Report Share Posted March 12, 2004 Christianity, Buddhism, and all other spiritual traditions apprehend an angle on reality different then that of science. Science, as opposed to scientism, makes no claims about the location of 'mind' or 'soul' vis a vis the body. Science is a method, not a doctrine. It is a method based on that which can be measured and perceived by the senses either directly or indirectly with technology. Scientism, on the other hand, is a belief based on the faith that reality is nothing more than that which can be perceived by the senses. In that respect it is very similar to conventional religion. Strictly speaking, a scientist would make no claim on the nature of soul, mind, consciousness, beauty, truth, love, the good, etc... because he or she would admit to having no scientific way of evaluating such a claim. Buddhism is somewhat similar to science in that rather than advocating a belief in something or other, one engages in an active investigation into the nature of one's own experience to discover some truth that those who have fully done so claim to be a realization that liberates one from suffering. Buddhist doctrine is nontheistic. It neither refutes nor supports any ulitimate theories about the nature of existence as this or that. It does offer some orienting propositions by which one can embark on his or her investigations. But Buddhism, in it's purest form, leaves the rest up to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.