Re: Suze - Sex good for adrenal exhaustion

[Guest guest]

> Suze - Sex good for adrenal exhaustion

>

>

>Hiya Suze (and all),

>

>Just to bring together a couple of subjects you've mentioned

>recently...

>

>Have you read Chronic Fatigue Unmasked 2000 by Gerald Poesnecker?

Nope.

>Part of his protocol for adrenal exhaustion, which he says is

>espeically important for women, is regular sex.

Now yer talkin'! LOL!

But it has to be the

>right kind, apparently. Between married couples, he says. And it is

>only beneficial if there is no barrier, so that each parner gets the

>beneficial aspects of each others juices.

Wow...even better! :-P Gosh, guess I'd best be getting married soon if I

want to save my adrenals. Do chemical barriers such as nonoxynol 9 count as

barriers that block the benefits? I've been wanting to start the ovulation

method, but haven't found the time to check out the different books on this

yet.

>

>My thought was, well that's all very well, but getting pregnant

>would not be desirable for a woman with adrenal exhaustion - the

>last thing you'd want really.

Right.

>

>But I also mentioned it to my acupuncturist, and she agreed with

>him. Said that the male juices were very strengthening to women and

>she thinks it's because women need so much of that particular energy

>for pregnancy, childbirth, nuring, etc. I think she called it Jing,

>but I don't imagine that's how you spell it.

>

>So there you go - i don't think Dr schulze's ointment and it's

>effects is what they have in mind, sadly :-(

Indeed.

Thanks for the info, Deb - now I know the ultimate adrenal fatigue " cure " .

Probably a cure for a lot of things, come to think of it :-D

Suze Fisher

Lapdog Design, Inc.

Web Design & Development

http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg

Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine

http://www.westonaprice.org

----------------------------

“The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause

heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times.” --

Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt

University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher.

The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics

<http://www.thincs.org>

----------------------------

[Guest guest]

Quoting Deb <deb@...>:

> Have you read Chronic Fatigue Unmasked 2000 by Gerald Poesnecker?

> Part of his protocol for adrenal exhaustion, which he says is

> espeically important for women, is regular sex. But it has to be the

> right kind, apparently. Between married couples, he says.

Well, so much for my plans to open up shop as an adrenal therapist.

> My thought was, well that's all very well, but getting pregnant

> would not be desirable for a woman with adrenal exhaustion - the

> last thing you'd want really.

How many married couples use some sort of barrier for contraception?

--

Berg

bberg@...

[Guest guest]

>Said that the male juices were very strengthening to women

Hmm, what if the male in question has had a vasectomy? Does it need to be

ALL the juices, or is the pertinent one being rerouted in that case?

~ Carma ~

mom to Noa 8.5 yog ~ Colter 6 yob ~ r 2.5 yob ~ Mica 8 mog ~ wife 18.5

yrs to Russ

God has given you all you need to train and educate your children at home -

it's in real books and real life. ~ Clay son

[Guest guest]

It was a library book and it's gone back, so i can't check. I

suspect that a vasectomy would count as a barrier though. I can ask

my acupuncturist next time I go (end of next week), if you like.

deb

> >Said that the male juices were very strengthening to women

>

> Hmm, what if the male in question has had a vasectomy? Does it

need to be

> ALL the juices, or is the pertinent one being rerouted in that

case?

>

[Guest guest]

> How many married couples use some sort of barrier for contraception?

*waving* meee! Can't use the pill or IUDs or Norplants, chemically

sensitive to nonoxynol-9 which is not reliable anyway.

Lynn S.

of the " too much information " S's, but then this is the TMI list, nu?

------

Lynn Siprelle * web developer, writer, mama, fiber junky

Editor/Publisher, The New Homemaker

http://www.thenewhomemaker.com/

Celebrating 5 Years of Homemaker and Caregiver Support: 1999-2004

[Guest guest]

>But I also mentioned it to my acupuncturist, and she agreed with

>him. Said that the male juices were very strengthening to women and

>she thinks it's because women need so much of that particular energy

>for pregnancy, childbirth, nuring, etc. I think she called it Jing,

>but I don't imagine that's how you spell it.

OK, well, I can't help but comment here ... in New Scientist a few

months ago (or it may have been another mag) they quoted a study

that shows that women who have sex -- no condoms -- have a much

lower rate of depression. Apparently the " juices " as you term them

trigger a " happiness " factor of some sort. Which makes sense, really ...

contentment, settledness, whatever. However their stats weren't

tied to being married.

-- Heidi Jean

[Guest guest]

Yeah, well, I don't agree with the married bit myself, but he's the

doc :-)

It does make sense to me though, that sex within a committed,

monogamous relationship would be emotionally, and thus physically,

more beneficial than a casual fling.

We tried it " au naturale " just one time - maybe it was healthier,

but even though it was my safest time, I didn't feel totally secure

till I got my next period. So, swings and roundabouts, ya know....

deb

>

> >But I also mentioned it to my acupuncturist, and she agreed with

> >him. Said that the male juices were very strengthening to women

and

> >she thinks it's because women need so much of that particular

energy

> >for pregnancy, childbirth, nuring, etc. I think she called it

Jing,

> >but I don't imagine that's how you spell it.

>

> OK, well, I can't help but comment here ... in New Scientist a few

> months ago (or it may have been another mag) they quoted a study

> that shows that women who have sex -- no condoms -- have a much

> lower rate of depression. Apparently the " juices " as you term them

> trigger a " happiness " factor of some sort. Which makes sense,

really ...

> contentment, settledness, whatever. However their stats weren't

> tied to being married.

>

> -- Heidi Jean

[Guest guest]

At 10:37 PM 4/6/04 -0700, you wrote:

>OK, well, I can't help but comment here ... in New Scientist a few

>months ago (or it may have been another mag) they quoted a study

>that shows that women who have sex -- no condoms -- have a much

>lower rate of depression. Apparently the " juices " as you term them

>trigger a " happiness " factor of some sort. Which makes sense, really ...

>contentment, settledness, whatever. However their stats weren't

>tied to being married.

Must be why I hate socks.

MFJ

Wheeeeee! ~Katja

[Guest guest]

> My thought was, well that's all very well, but getting pregnant

> would not be desirable for a woman with adrenal exhaustion - the

> last thing you'd want really.

I'm sorry if this has already been suggested, but this problem could

be resolved by engaging in oral sex and swallowing. It's sexier than

spitting anyway. If the beneficial components are lipid soluble,

this shouldn't be a problem, and it would seem more beneficial than

other absorption. However, if there are water-soluble components,

bypassing digestion would be best. That could be resolved by

swishing instead of swallowing. The cheek lining and especially

sublingual tissues are probably as or more absorptive as the vaginal

and related tissues I'd think.

Chris

[Guest guest]

> >OK, well, I can't help but comment here ... in New Scientist a few

> >months ago (or it may have been another mag) they quoted a study

> >that shows that women who have sex -- no condoms -- have a much

> >lower rate of depression. Apparently the " juices " as you term them

> >trigger a " happiness " factor of some sort. Which makes sense,

really ...

> >contentment, settledness, whatever. However their stats weren't

> >tied to being married.

>

> Must be why I hate socks.

Yeah, they're not really reliable with respect to preventing

pregnancy anyway, even when the rubber band is real tight.

Chris