Guest guest Posted April 8, 2004 Report Share Posted April 8, 2004 >Loren Cordain is someone who does distorted research, anyway. I don't know >whether he intentionally lies (to himself or to everyone else) or whether >he's honestly deceived, but have you read his arguments against saturated >animal fat? > >- Yeah, there is a point. However, if you read the data against fat I'm not sure it is a case of deception. The epidemiological studies do seem, IMO to show that in our society, people who eat a lot of fat beef seem to have more problems. And fat milk. And those are the two main sources of saturated fat in the studies (they don't really have epidemiological data in the US for coconut oil). People who eat more " saturated fat " really do have more problems. So if you take the studies at face value, a person would say, " hmm ... saturated fat is bad " . Which I did until I got more into it ... now I think that the fact the cows are all on grain diets and fed hormones probably has more to do with it, plus the fact the people on high-fat diets are also on high-grain diets. I expect the researchers will come around to that conclusion eventually too ... but I don't think it's a matter of deception. It's a matter of interpreting the data. Sort of like ... if they did a study on Inuit babies and found that the kids of " traditional eating " women had lower IQ's, one might think the traditional diet caused that. Until you found out that the traditional diet now contains dioxin. Fats do hold the toxins of an animal, and they are imbalanced in grain fed animals, so most animal fats in the supermarket probably are bad for you (though not NEARLY as bad as wheat .... ) -- Heidi Jean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.