Guest guest Posted May 6, 2004 Report Share Posted May 6, 2004 I can't find the post, but I recall having read something in one of my previous posts about mercury that I think needs clarification. I said something to the effect that there's a lot of controversy in the mercury/amalgam community and that almost nothing is agreed upon. That's not really true. What I meant to say is that how to successfully *rid* the body of mercury is an issue on which there's much disagreement. There's no disagreement on whether mercury is a serious toxic metal - the second most toxic metal in the word after uranium, IIRC. And there's no disagreement that it should be removed from the body, except perhaps among a few fringests. But the major disagreements are on exactly how to test for mercury toxicity, and how to safely and effectively remove it from the body. Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.