Guest guest Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 Dear Ones, No one has cleared up whether we are getting the same KT from the health foods stores as we are making at home. If one is acetic acid based and one is lactic acid based, who has the real Kombucha Tea as handed down for generations? I wish someone would test them and give us a comp[lete breakdown of the contents. If it costs much, maybe we could all chip in. Blessings on you all. LOve. MArge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2006 Report Share Posted December 26, 2006 This is an excerpt from the book " Kombucha - Healthy beverage and natural Remedy from the Far East " by Guenther W. . Where you buy this book See http://www.kombu.de/where.htm. The " genuine " Kombucha culture " Have I got the real Kombucha culture? Where do I get the right culture From? " These are questions that bother a lot of people, and are forever Cropping up. To anticipate the answer right away: there is no one clear answer to this Question. Reiss (1987) reduces it to the common denominator: " The precise Combination of the component elements of individual Kombucha preparations Can vary widely, so that it's not so much a case of " the " Kombucha Culture, but of a great number of them. " This view is confirmed by all the other authors. Lindner (1913 and 1917/ 18) had already noticed that the composition of the individual cultures Could be very different, particularly with regard to the yeasts. And Valentin (1930), who experimented with a variety of different strains, Says that the varying results of his researches taught him that there is a Great variety in the individual culture colonies. He describes his results In the following terms: " At any rate it must be emphasized that the chemical processes in Kombucha Cultures are dependent on the bacteria available. But it's not just from The fermented products that one can tell commercially obtainable Kombucha Cultures contain a variety of quite different strains of yeast and Bacteria; even the symbiotic relationship of the individual varieties to Each other varies greatly. " Valentin (1928) even recommends chemists to raise a varieties of cultures In order to be able to give their customers the appropriate culture to Match the desired taste. The Russian research scientist ova confirms in a thesis published in 1954 ( " Morphology of the tea fungus " ) that the actual composition of the Symbiont varies according to geographical and climatic conditions, and Depends on whatever types of wild yeasts and bacteria exist locally. The variety of combinations forming the Kombucha culture can possibly be Caused by differing growth of the individual constituents. Depending on Which conditions of growth best suit which constituents of the culture, so One sort develops better than another. Because I considered the question of the " genuine " Kombucha culture to be Very important, I consulted Professor Ulf Stahl of the Technical University, Berlin (Microbiological Research Institute), who was known to Me as an authority in the field of microbiology. Professor Stahl told me That the opinion of the Microbiological Research Institute is that the Kombucha culture is composed of Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Acetobacter Xylinum. These constituents are also given by authors worldwide. Dr. Maxim Bing (1928) gives Bacterium xylinum and the tropical Pombe yeast, as well as Bact. Xylonoides and gluconicum as constituents in pure cultures. The First two are given a certain prominence. Dr. Arauner (1929) confirms this: " The Kombucha culture is not a Standardized thing, but a fungal consortium of Bacterium xylinum (former Designation of Acetobacter xylinum) in symbiosis with Pombe yeast. " Prof. Henneberg (1926 also mentions exactly the same combination in his Handbook on fermentation bacteriology, and recommends pure cultures of Both these constituents. A pure or axenic culture consists of a single type of micro-organism. In Bacteriology, often only the descendants of one single bacterium cell (isolation of single-cell colonies) are referred to as a pure culture (Schön, 1978). When Prof. Henneberg recommends using pure cultures, he means by that Nothing more than cultivating both constituent part - Bacterium xylinum And the Pombe yeast - separately, and only then bringing them together. Preparing the beverage at home, of course, one has to continue working With the already combined constituents of the culture. The sum up, one may say: The principal constituents Schizosaccharomyces Pombe and Bacterium (Acetobacter) xylinum are both unhesitatingly attested In the writings of the experts. An exception to this is Wiechowski (1928), Who considers Bacterium gluconicum to be the principal bacterium and Bacterium xylinum next in order of importance. Irrespective of these, Other bacteria and yeasts are mentioned as being constituent elements, Whose presence however varies. Our opinions are like our watches. Nobody's is exactly the same as Anybody else's, and yet everyone Believes their own to be right. Gellert -- In original_kombucha , " Marjorie Russin " wrote: > > Dear Ones, > > No one has cleared up whether we are getting the same KT from the health foods stores as we are making at home. > > If one is acetic acid based and one is lactic acid based, who has the real Kombucha Tea as handed down for generations? > > I wish someone would test them and give us a comp[lete breakdown of the contents. > > If it costs much, maybe we could all chip in. > > Blessings on you all. LOve. MArge. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.