Guest guest Posted May 30, 2004 Report Share Posted May 30, 2004 > Nourishing Traditions says raw seafood is good. > > Question is, is there a way to neutralize the bad bacteria, without cooking the seafood? > > I was thinking about soaking in G.S.E., but perhaps you have a better idea? > > Thanks for your answers or comments. > > DMJ If you let bite size pieces of raw seafood soak in fresh lime or lemon juice the acid in the juice " cooks " the seafood without using heat. I do not know if it destroys bad bacteria or how long the seafood should soak. It may be helpful to add zest from the peel to the soak as the essential citrus oils might have some antibacterial properties. While visiting Okinawa I heard of individuals roaming the beaches at lowtide looking for dead sea urchins. Evidently the dead sea urchins ferment and can be eaten uncooked with a spoon out of the shell. Somehow I doubt I'll ever try this dish. Darrell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2004 Report Share Posted June 1, 2004 Geez, I'm way behind on e-group stuff these days, pretty hectic days, but I just scanned the past few days of messages and I thought this was interesting... a perennial topic we still don't have good answers for... @@@@@@@@@@@@@@ > There is a warning on the package that this and all seafood " must be thoroughly cooked " , as well as a brochure at the market with dire warnings about a special, very harmful/toxic bacteria in e.g. raw, uncooked clams. > > Nourishing Traditions says raw seafood is good. > > Question is, is there a way to neutralize the bad bacteria, without cooking the seafood? > > I was thinking about soaking in G.S.E., but perhaps you have a better idea? @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Well, raw seafood is unquestionably good, but most things are both good and bad at the same time, and the balance of the two is heavily dependent on extrinsic circumstances, like how the food was produced. I think we have to take it case-by-case and always deal with practical limitations. I eat raw oysters all the time, but I always cook my eel and snails. Compared to raw, I don't think it makes much difference to steam seafood a little to eliminate dangers. From everything I'm aware of (surely not everything, but well more than nothing), the nutritional change seems insignificant. I eat raw octopus pretty often too, and sometimes it's tastier that way, but sometimes it tastes better or is more tender briefly steamed. Same for cuttlefish, which is incredible steamed for like 30 seconds or a minute. But then something like oysters tastes much better raw. Certainly there's no need to cook any seafood (besides fish carcasses) to death like in marathon soups/stews or power-frying, but I think the better idea in this case is to just cook minimally in cases where there's uncertainty. That talk about clams and such certainly makes me nervous, and I'm not into taking risks with this stuff, so if I prefer to play it safe in any " hot " cases. Also, I probably don't need to point out that those dire warnings are there for legal reasons and don't constitute reliable information. Mike SE Pennsylvania The best way to predict the future is to invent it. --Alan Kay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.