Guest guest Posted June 17, 2004 Report Share Posted June 17, 2004 After my reprimand, I have read the recommended web site. I agree in principle that we need higher nutrient density foods (especially mineral and phytonutrients/antioxidants) and that these tends to be smaller, heirloom varieties grown not for shelf-life and volume but for taste. I understand that certain soil conditions and moisture, plant stressors can alter the antioxidant content of produce (e.g. resevetrol in drought stressed grapes and higher vit C in plants under pest pressure and organic produce). I still don't see why you don't measure what you're looking for. As animal nutritionists we do nutrient analyses on all our animal feed especially forage and as veterinarians we use refractometers all the time (the comment on dehydration did not refer to the sample drying out but the plant or animal hydration status at harvest- a HUGE factor in nutrient density...when did you last water the corn and how hot has it been since then). If Brix is the best measurement for now, so be it. Refractometers sure are handy and I like the idea or monitoring growing plants in the field - we send samples to the lab). Meg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.