Guest guest Posted July 14, 2004 Report Share Posted July 14, 2004 I wanted to post this as I was the one that mentioned it a few weeks ago in some thread. LOL...can't remember what the heck it was. Endocrine disruptors by the way are in pesticides, dixon, pcp's, plastics and quite a few other stuff. They accumulate in fatty tissues esp. breast tissue and get nto milk. They can act like hormones in the body in ways they shouldn't. Anyhow, this past weekend I had the opportunity to talk to a nutrition PhD researcher at CDC who just happened to have an interest in this very thing. He said yes, it's a big problem, the effects of which we really can't study accurately as they do different things at different times during our developement...especially for girls during puberty. But that aside from all his research on nursing babies, he felt the benefits still outwieghed the potential risks. He said babies really need to be nursed through the first 2 years to totally develop their immune and other systems. He also was big time against regular milk for babies. I asked about raw cow or goat and he said he'd never looked for data on that so he wasn't sure, but his guess was no. That's all I know! Lynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2004 Report Share Posted July 14, 2004 wow, that's super interesting, lynn. i'd love to see his data. think your friend would mind sharing his specific findings? and when you say against regular milk for babies, do you mean prior to one year of age or even longer? and is that dairy in any form or just milk? btw, i like his stance on extended breastfeeding. right on! erica z > I wanted to post this as I was the one that mentioned it a few weeks > ago in some thread. LOL...can't remember what the heck it was. > > Endocrine disruptors by the way are in pesticides, dixon, pcp's, > plastics and quite a few other stuff. They accumulate in fatty tissues > esp. breast tissue and get nto milk. They can act like hormones in the > body in ways they shouldn't. > > Anyhow, this past weekend I had the opportunity to talk to a nutrition > PhD researcher at CDC who just happened to have an interest in this > very thing. He said yes, it's a big problem, the effects of which we > really can't study accurately as they do different things at different > times during our developement...especially for girls during puberty. > But that aside from all his research on nursing babies, he felt the > benefits still outwieghed the potential risks. He said babies really > need to be nursed through the first 2 years to totally develop their > immune and other systems. > > He also was big time against regular milk for babies. I asked about > raw cow or goat and he said he'd never looked for data on that so he > wasn't sure, but his guess was no. > > That's all I know! > Lynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2004 Report Share Posted July 15, 2004 Hi Ercia, Hope this might help a bit more > your friend would mind sharing his specific findings? ----> I don't know him well at all. He was a speaker at a food conference I attended last weekend. Afterwards we were sitting around talking about fats and got into endocrine disruptors causing girl's early development. I asked the question about breast milk and he said the endocrine disruptors are a hugh problem but felt still all said and done, breast feeding was better. He's got my phone number as he wants to hook up with more Atlanta alternative food people so if I hear from him again I'll ask for more. > and when you say against regular milk for babies, do you mean prior > to one year of age or even longer? and is that dairy in any form or > just milk? -----> Don't know the answers to any of that. Remember he didn't know the answer to " raw " dairy and babies. He thought his research looked only at pasturized. He was not a big dairy fan however...from his lecture I would guess he leaned heavily towards lowering animal fat diets. > btw, i like his stance on extended breastfeeding. right on! ----> The problem isn't that extended breastfeeding isn't the best way to go. I think the problem is at what price. As he said no one really knows the answer to this yet ..that generation is young or being raised now. It's very complicated as the hormone load in one child may not have the same effect as in another due to thier exposures later on and the timing of those exposure. With young girls the hormone loads of puberty make them especially vunerable. Younger women and vegetarians will have far fewer disruptors in thier bodies than those who have consumed more animal fats. It's all a trade-off in these times. This is from " Hormone Deception " ; " Tests of mother's milk have shown it can contain higher levels of contaminants than are permitted in cow's milk sold in gracery stores " . I guess the ideal would be if each woman could get tested for her levels, then try to detox as much as possible out before getting pregnant. And work with an educated doctor to determine her the best course for her baby based on what she can't detox out. I don't know. If this is an area you're interested in I would suggest reading " Hormone Deception " by Lindsey Berkson. It contains a whole chapter on breast and womb contamination and looks at studies done on women in 3rd world countries where DDT is still used. They discuss the drop in contaminants in a womans body after prenancy as some is transferred to the baby. It's an eye opener. She discusses detoxing before pregancy. A second even better book is " Our Stolen Future " by Theo Colborn or look at the book synopsis: http://www.ourstolenfuture.org/Basics/bookbasics.htm And " Our Children's Toxic Legacy: How Science and Law Fail to Protect Us from Pesticides " You can get all of these used on Amazon. A simple overveiw of it with children is here:http://www.cape.ca/children/repro6.html Lynn > erica z > > > I wanted to post this as I was the one that mentioned it a few > weeks > > ago in some thread. LOL...can't remember what the heck it was. > > > > Endocrine disruptors by the way are in pesticides, dixon, pcp's, > > plastics and quite a few other stuff. They accumulate in fatty > tissues > > esp. breast tissue and get nto milk. They can act like hormones in > the > > body in ways they shouldn't. > > > > Anyhow, this past weekend I had the opportunity to talk to a > nutrition > > PhD researcher at CDC who just happened to have an interest in this > > very thing. He said yes, it's a big problem, the effects of which > we > > really can't study accurately as they do different things at > different > > times during our developement...especially for girls during > puberty. > > But that aside from all his research on nursing babies, he felt the > > benefits still outwieghed the potential risks. He said babies > really > > need to be nursed through the first 2 years to totally develop > their > > immune and other systems. > > > > He also was big time against regular milk for babies. I asked about > > raw cow or goat and he said he'd never looked for data on that so > he > > wasn't sure, but his guess was no. > > > > That's all I know! > > Lynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2004 Report Share Posted July 16, 2004 ---Lynn,Those chemicals flow thru the waste water treatment facilities too, I think. Like in " fertilizers " and " composts " sold from those places and probably downstream too. Dennis Kemnitz In , " Lynn Razaitis " <lyn122@y...> wrote: > I wanted to post this as I was the one that mentioned it a few weeks > ago in some thread. LOL...can't remember what the heck it was. > > Endocrine disruptors by the way are in pesticides, dixon, pcp's, > plastics and quite a few other stuff. They accumulate in fatty tissues > esp. breast tissue and get nto milk. They can act like hormones in the > body in ways they shouldn't. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2004 Report Share Posted July 16, 2004 Lynn, I use a multipure but have well water. Could it still be a problem? Elainie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2004 Report Share Posted July 16, 2004 Yeah they sure do and our water treatment center were never designed to get this stuff out. I've also read that birth control pills and antibiotics now showing up in tap water. I've have no idea if regular barbon based filters many of us have in our houses remove this stuff. We have a multipure with a fluoride filter attached. I have my doubts about this so now I order glass bottled spring water that delivered. I try to make that at least over half my cooking and drinking water and then use filtered as backup. I wish we just had a well....the whole thing is so complicated to try and reduce this. I've had hormonal problems so I'm extra careful these days. Plus I've read so much on this stuff. Lynn > > I wanted to post this as I was the one that mentioned it a few weeks > > ago in some thread. LOL...can't remember what the heck it was. > > > > Endocrine disruptors by the way are in pesticides, dixon, pcp's, > > plastics and quite a few other stuff. They accumulate in fatty > tissues > > esp. breast tissue and get nto milk. They can act like hormones in > the > > body in ways they shouldn't. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.