Guest guest Posted July 9, 2004 Report Share Posted July 9, 2004 In a message dated 7/9/04 8:27:32 AM Eastern Daylight Time, s.fisher22@... writes: > >Oh, definitely. Remember that post way back I made about hybrids > >and cobalt? > > No, I don't remembet that. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2004 Report Share Posted July 9, 2004 In a message dated 7/9/04 10:48:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time, ChrisMasterjohn@... writes: > > >Oh, definitely. Remember that post way back I made about hybrids > > >and cobalt? > > > > No, I don't remembet that. K, I'll type it up again: Walters, , _Eco-Farm: An Acres USA Primer_, pg 38, window: Some of the success that have attended corn production my have been the result of distorted accounting procedures. In terms of nutrients, open pollinated still has an enviable record. Adolph Steinbrown of Fairbanks, Iowa put the matter in perspectivre by having two samples of corn tested for ingredietns usually added to the commercial feeds. One was a sample of hybrids he had grown. The other was OP corn. The OP corn contained 19% more crude protein, 35% more digestible protein, 60^ more copper, 27% more iron, and 25% more manganese. Compared to some 4000 samples of corn tested in ten midwest states in a single year, Steibronn's OP corn contained 75% more crude protein, 875% more copper, 345% more iron, and 205% more manganese. The same trend has also been seen in the content of calcium, sodium, magnesium and zinc. It can therefore be said that OP corn could contain an average of over 400% more of these nutrients. Earnest M. Halbleib of McNabb, Illinois confirmed the failure of hybrid corn to uptake certain mineral nutrients. In comparing Krug OP corn and a hybrid in the laboraty of Armour's Institute of Research, Chicago, spectrographic testing revealed the hybrid short of nine minerals. The hybrid failed to pick up cobalt and any other trace minerals. Both varieties had the same chance to pick up a balanced ration. " The reason I mentioned cobalt, " wrote Halbleibl, " is that we found (on the 16 farms in test) that no hybrid picked up cobalt, and in all the tests the hybrid was short seven to nine minerals, always exhibiting a failure to pick up cobalt. " The core of vitamin B12 is cobalt. Ira , MD, and others have found that a lack of cobalt is implicated as a cause of brucellosis and undulant fever, and cobalt is part of the cure. In the opinion of many eco-farmers, hybrid corn merely masks poor farming by producing bins and bushels without the nutrient goodies that are really corn's reason for being. ___________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2004 Report Share Posted July 9, 2004 > Re: Re: hybrids (was Question for Chi) > >Compared to some 4000 samples of corn tested in ten midwest states in a >single year, Steibronn's OP corn contained 75% more crude protein, >875% more >copper, 345% more iron, and 205% more manganese. The same trend >has also been seen >in the content of calcium, sodium, magnesium and zinc. It can >therefore be >said that OP corn could contain an average of over 400% more of >these nutrients. WOW! Now I know what Chi meant when he said as long as the organic movement allows hybrids, it's not moving toward more nutritious food. If this corn study is any indication, then it seems *any* movement that permits hybrids is moving in the *opposite* direction of nutritional quality - FAR, FAR away. Thanks for taking the time to write that up again! Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 > Re: Re: hybrids (was Question for Chi) >> >> >> > >> >Compared to some 4000 samples of corn tested in ten midwest states >in a >> >single year, Steibronn's OP corn contained 75% more crude protein, >> >875% more >> >copper, 345% more iron, and 205% more manganese. The same trend >> >has also been seen >> >in the content of calcium, sodium, magnesium and zinc. It can >> >therefore be >> >said that OP corn could contain an average of over 400% more of >> >these nutrients. >> >> WOW! Now I know what Chi meant when he said as long as the organic >movement >> allows hybrids, it's not moving toward more nutritious food. If >this corn >> study is any indication, then it seems *any* movement that permits >hybrids >> is moving in the *opposite* direction of nutritional quality - FAR, >FAR >> away. >> >> Thanks for taking the time to write that up again! >> >> >> >> Suze Fisher >> Lapdog Design, Inc. >> Web Design & Development >> http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg >> Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine >> http://www.westonaprice.org >> >> ---------------------------- >> " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol >cause >> heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " - >- >> Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at >Vanderbilt >> University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. >> >> The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics >> <http://www.thincs.org> >> ---------------------------- > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 > Re: hybrids (was Question for Chi) > > >---Hello Suze, I just haven't caught up with Dr. yet. He >and Dr Ingham are conducting research and appprox.$700 4 day >seminars. They apparently have some very worthwhile info. See some >of their papers in ACRE's, USA publications(and Sally is published >there too!). And Dr Skow's book, Farming in the 21st Century is one >of my most used references. However, the soilfoodweb is exciting >cause in productive soil, it's bacT,fungi etc, take care of lots of >things naturally. Reams and Andersen get into this too. I'd be surprised if Skow didn't since he was an apprentice of Reams. I still have problems with weeds (I don't know much >about compost)and we still need moisture in a timely manner as well >as aerated soils. So far I am listening (on about my 4th listen to >them) >to soilfoodweb's cd's in some spare time on the job and applying >compost tea on some crops(on the farm). There's some benefits to a >LABORatory job. Dennis Kemnitz It would be great if you took before and after brix readings on your crops every time you do something different to the soil so you can see what is working and what isn't. Are you already doing that? Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- “The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times.” -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.