Guest guest Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 ---WOW, You folks cover so much in a posting. And you find so much info.I have to make at least one point below which I know from experience. Dennis Kemnitz In , Heidi Schuppenhauer <heidis@t...> wrote: > > >>Which answers the question about lectins ... > > > >Maybe, but maybe not. The question is whether higher protein necessarily > >translates to higher lectins, specifically. > > > The thing is, the protein in grains IS lectin. Lectins are just a type > of protein that tends to bind to a saccharide, and the type > of protein that grains produce is lectin. The proteins in wheat > are glutenin and gliadin, both of which are lectins. > > Not that all lectins are bad ... there are lectins in every food we eat, I think. > Some of them just aren't very digestible and seem to cause > problems, and specifically may be involved in arthritis. But the higher > protein in wheat is mainly the result of purposeful breeding ... > high protein wheat sells for more money. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTo make a loaf of " desirable " bread the wheat flour needs a certain protein content, maybe 14%(without adding extra gluten). So when a processor gets hold of 15 or maybe 16% protein wheat some lower(quality) protein flour can be blended in. Here is the unfavorable part. The farmer in KS does not get a premium price for high protein content. Moisture and test weight are the 2 factors I know of which determine the bushel price of the grain. Some year's protein is higher than others. So the processor is getting the protein at no extra cost. How's that for incentive to mill and bake? Sometimes free protein. And the wheat is bought at approx. 14-15% moisture while bread is sold with around 38% moisture. So added water makes money. And Coors sells basically 96.8% water in their 3.2% beer. Money is the factor affecting quality, in my opinion. Didn't mean to open up another debatable topic, again it's just my opinion. So until the toxic chemical users have to pay for cleanup, chemical farming and processing will continue at it's current pace. Dennis Kemnitz From what Chi said, it may > be that the protein in corn is LESS now, than the native American corn, > because it's being bred for sugar content. > > -- Heidi Jean > > http://www.dadamo.com/knowbase/lectin/lect5.htm > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.