Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 => Hmmmm...how long have you been consuming this much dairy and bone meal > capsules? I didn't notice any difference in my nails until I'd been on the > bone meal for about 5 months or so. -----> Not that long..maybe 2 months so that's good to know. Before that i assumed I was getting enough Ca for about 2 cups raw diary and bone broths I consume almost daily. Evidently not. Dr. Ron told me to start the bone meal sup. in late June and I had the blood test done in late July so 1 month of supplementing isn't much. The results of the test showed low Ca even though for the last 2 years I've been on raw dairy and bone broths. When i talked to him last week he said up the dairy to 4 cups and the bone meal to 6 caps. I'll test again in 6 months. So the fact it took you 5 months to see a difference makes sense. On digestion ....possible but i really don't seem to have too many stomach problems with food so I'm kinda doubting that. I'm on an Thorne enzyme though just in case. I'm really wondering if the amount of Ca many of us need is really way higher than say around 1500mg /cay. I think weston prices populations often had much higher than that. Anyhow on the Fe binding Ca question. I'll have to ask the person where she's heard milk can do this. Given the Masai and swiss poplulation didn't seem to have this problem it doesn't make sense. I'm wondering if it's the form the Ca is in that causes it to bind with Fe??? And the research simply hasn't been done with raw milk just regular Ca supplements Lynn >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 > Re: increased Ca causing Fe deficiency - Suze > > >=> Hmmmm...how long have you been consuming this much dairy and bone >meal >> capsules? I didn't notice any difference in my nails until I'd >been on the >> bone meal for about 5 months or so. > >-----> Not that long..maybe 2 months so that's good to know. Before >that i assumed I was getting enough Ca for about 2 cups raw diary >and bone broths I consume almost daily. Well, I was consuming quite a bit of kefir daily - over two cups I think - AND taking CA supplements and my blood CA was still coming up slightly low. For all I know it's still low, but I do know that my nails started getting much stronger about 5 months into Ron's protocol with his bone meal supp. But my nails are weak now again. I've cut back on CLO because it's summer and I don't want to consume too many PUFAs with the extra summer sun exposure, so that could be why my nails have weakened again. Or it could be a food allergy like gluten or casein which I've recently added back to my diet. >Anyhow on the Fe binding Ca question. I'll have to ask the person >where she's heard milk can do this. Given the Masai and swiss >poplulation didn't seem to have this problem it doesn't make sense. >I'm wondering if it's the form the Ca is in that causes it to bind >with Fe??? I have no idea. I still think there could be some other imbalance causing you to excrete CA or not absorb it, such as a possible CA antagonist...these things are hard to figure out! So many possibilities... Suze Fisher Lapdog Design, Inc. Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine http://www.westonaprice.org ---------------------------- “The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times.” -- Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics <http://www.thincs.org> ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2004 Report Share Posted August 18, 2004 I am one of those people who excrete a lot of calcium. I am limited to 400 mg a day from food only. Under this amount of CA I an regaining the bone I lost.My nails have never been fragile, but my bones where getting thinner despite 1500 mg of supplemental calcuium a day. You might want to ask you doctor about the calcium urine excretion test. It's an easy urine collection test you do at home. I did it twice, once on supplements of calcium and a few weeks later at 400 mg of calcium from food. The condition I have is called hypercaliuria. It's easy to treat. Sheila --- In , " Suze Fisher " <s.fisher22@v...> wrote: > > > Re: increased Ca causing Fe deficiency - Suze > > > > > >=> Hmmmm...how long have you been consuming this much dairy and bone > >meal > >> capsules? I didn't notice any difference in my nails until I'd > >been on the > >> bone meal for about 5 months or so. > > > >-----> Not that long..maybe 2 months so that's good to know. Before > >that i assumed I was getting enough Ca for about 2 cups raw diary > >and bone broths I consume almost daily. > > Well, I was consuming quite a bit of kefir daily - over two cups I think - > AND taking CA supplements and my blood CA was still coming up slightly low. > For all I know it's still low, but I do know that my nails started getting > much stronger about 5 months into Ron's protocol with his bone meal supp. > > But my nails are weak now again. I've cut back on CLO because it's summer > and I don't want to consume too many PUFAs with the extra summer sun > exposure, so that could be why my nails have weakened again. Or it could be > a food allergy like gluten or casein which I've recently added back to my > diet. > > > > > >Anyhow on the Fe binding Ca question. I'll have to ask the person > >where she's heard milk can do this. Given the Masai and swiss > >poplulation didn't seem to have this problem it doesn't make sense. > >I'm wondering if it's the form the Ca is in that causes it to bind > >with Fe??? > > I have no idea. I still think there could be some other imbalance causing > you to excrete CA or not absorb it, such as a possible CA antagonist...these > things are hard to figure out! So many possibilities... > > > > Suze Fisher > Lapdog Design, Inc. > Web Design & Development > http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg > Weston A. Price Foundation Chapter Leader, Mid Coast Maine > http://www.westonaprice.org > > ---------------------------- > " The diet-heart idea (the idea that saturated fats and cholesterol cause > heart disease) is the greatest scientific deception of our times. " - - > Mann, MD, former Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Vanderbilt > University, Tennessee; heart disease researcher. > > The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics > <http://www.thincs.org> > ---------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2004 Report Share Posted August 18, 2004 > For all I know it's still low, but I do know that my nails started getting > much stronger about 5 months into Ron's protocol with his bone meal supp. ----> Interesting I didn't realize that Ca would take so long to build up. So you're still on the same amount of dairy and bone meal supplements and the only thing that changed is CLO? I guess the only real solution to the PUFA problem and CLO is organ meat. Guess I need to get back to liver tonics. Wonder what Enig has to say about the PUFAs and large doses CLO???? Lynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2004 Report Share Posted August 18, 2004 > I have no idea. I still think there could be some other imbalance causing > you to excrete CA or not absorb it, such as a possible CA antagonist...these > things are hard to figure out! So many possibilities... ----> I wonder how much of this also has to do with faulty Ca mechanisms due to parents SAD that left along with bone and teeth problems lots of less observable internal underdevolped organs? I'm the child of two wonderful parents but they did exactly what the doctors of the day told them......and it wasn't breastfeeding and raw dairy! If so some of this may simply be a matter of having to oversupplement in order to supply enough to override poor bady mechanisms. As you said....many possibilities and who knows...... Lynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2004 Report Share Posted August 18, 2004 At 08:18 PM 8/17/2004, you wrote: >I guess the only real solution to the PUFA problem and CLO is organ >meat. Guess I need to get back to liver tonics. Wonder what >Enig has to say about the PUFAs and large doses CLO???? > >Lynn hey, lynn, aren't you on chapterleaders? can you post this over there? i'm interested!! -katja Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2004 Report Share Posted August 18, 2004 > hey, lynn, aren't you on chapterleaders? can you post this over there? i'm > interested!! ---> Well duh on me! Good idea...and repost the answers over here! Lynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2004 Report Share Posted August 18, 2004 In a message dated 8/17/04 2:52:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time, lyn122@... writes: I'm wondering if it's the form the Ca is in that causes it to bind with Fe??? No, calcium cannot bind with iron. Iron comes in several forms, calcium comes in one. Whatever base the calcium is associated with might bind with iron, but the calcium itself couldn't. However, calcium could conceivably compete with iron for absorption into cells, especially if calcium has more affinity to the proteins in the cell that adsorb it than does iron. I don't know if this is the case, and it might be the case under certain conditions or in certain cells, or not. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2004 Report Share Posted August 18, 2004 In a message dated 8/17/04 7:17:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time, s.fisher22@... writes: Given the Masai and swiss >poplulation didn't seem to have this problem it doesn't make sense. >I'm wondering if it's the form the Ca is in that causes it to bind >with Fe??? On the other hand, the Masai ate practically nothing but red meat, besides the milk, so perhaps they just had tons of iron to compensate. The Swiss, I don't know, but I thought they consumed much less dairy than the Masai. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2004 Report Share Posted August 19, 2004 In a message dated 8/18/04 10:44:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, dezinegal@... writes: I believe, as far as what i remember of the documentary I saw, they rarely eat their cattle. Mainly they drink their milk and blood (using a special technique to drain the blood and then to plug the hole in the animals neck). The blood would be the iron source. Maybe they also eat insects, cant remember. From the little I've read, their meat consumption is infrequent, but enormous. So, they may eat 10 lbs of meat in a day, but not nearly every day. But you are right: the blood is regular I think, and would also be rich in iron. (Richer?) Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.