Guest guest Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 From www.lcolby.com: Some would argue, of course, that cigar and pipe smokers inhale less than cigarette smokers (although, in my case, I inhale both pipes and cigars). If, however, inhalation is a factor in the development of disease, it should show up in relative inhalation rates for cigarette smokers. A study was, in fact, conducted by Hill and Doll, which sought to classify cigarette smokers as inhaling vs. non-inhaling. At page 188 of the Report, there is a reference to a " negative association " between inhaling and lung cancer, based on the " early " Hill and Dole studies. In 1959, in fact, R.A. Fischer analyzed some of the Hill and Doll data and concluded that inhalers have a lower rate of lung cancer than non-inhalers 21 . Fischer's findings were incorporated into Table 8 of the 1982 Surgeon General's Report, but the Report did not deal with this apparent paradox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.