Guest guest Posted August 27, 2004 Report Share Posted August 27, 2004 Here's an interesting observation: I work at a concrete plant. I have not met a *single* person who works there and does not use tobacco, even though the rate in the general population is something around 20-25%. I've met two people who only chew, and one who smokes and chews, and most smoke. Concrete is nasty stuff. Wet concrete on the skin will sometimes burn right through layers of skin and cause open wounds (not quickly, but if on the skin for a duration of time.) The air is thick with dust from dried concrete, and when we sweep the floors or tighten bolts with the air gun the exposure is much greater. I work a 10-hour day, and people in other departments work longer. According to one of my co-workers, concrete dust causes black lung. Given what it does to the skin (it has some nasty chemicals in it), I can only imagine inhaling the dust every day for 10 hours is no good for the lungs. It irritates my eyes, nose, and throat, and lungs. I think part of the reason people smoke there is because of a class difference. They're working class folks, most of them not college-educated (except the office guys), etc. Also, I think working 50-60 hrs a week tends to drive people to smoke! (And drink too. My boss said when he was out for a few months with an injury he drank a 12 pack a week, now that he's back it's more like a 12-pack a day.) Anyway, 100% smoker rate or near it is a very dramatic difference from 20 or 25% smoker rate. I believe that cigarette-smoking correlates with lower economic class. One more factor to consider in the statistics. I see a whole lot of junk food get eaten for lunch, too. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.