Re: sweet spots and assessments

[Guest guest]

1: It's two chanel now! The other chanel that monitors inhibit

excursions does not need to be set up for biplar. I'm seeking

clarification from Sieg as to what they now do with this second

chanel.

2: One important feature of the approach your still missing is that

the rewards and inhibits are set to provide feedback based on

dynamical thresholding. In other words part of the feedback is based

on the frequent changes that occure in the actual EEG durring the

session. The questioning a responses from the clients is also

dynamical in the sense that it happens so frequently with adustments

of the targeting based also on verbal responses.

3: The feedback loop in terms of varying based on client response is

much faster with less delay time and more frequent than in the TLC or

any other approach I know of yet.

Targeting and thresholding is being changed multiple times durring a

session in part due to changes that are occuring in the dynamics of

the EEG. Two chanels with a number of montages are also being used

which also in part is due to changes that are occuring in the

dynamics of the EEG. Research has shown that not only location

specific and EEG training activation pattern specific changes occure

durring training. Other locations and activation patterns also show

changes.

In other words just because you don't specificaly train " lots of

high frequencies, lots of slow frequencies, poor alpha blocking,

alpha asymmetries, inability

to produce alpha, slow alpha peaks, etc, etc) " based on the results

of a non training statistical procedure like QEEG or TLC does not

mean they are also not shifting durring training as a result of the

Othmers approach.

Bruce

>

> > 1: It's always done with bipolar: Rewards are bipolar but

inhibits

> > could be otherwise.

> > 2: It does not require any information about brain activity or

activation

> > patterns: Information about the brain is required just not norm

based

> > information. It's dynamical information in regards to both to

optimal

> > frequency and excursions in the inhibits. The informtion is

client

> > interview responses and feedback around the excursions and

shifting reward

> > frequencies.

> > 3: protocols are the same for all clients: More individualization

and

> > tayloring based on client response, shifting of rewards and

excursions of

> > inhibits is going on than in the Q and non normative data based

mini Q

> > types of approaches such as the TLC.

> >

> > Bruce

> > .

> > _._,___

> >

> --

> Van Deusen

> pvdtlc@...

> http://www.brain-trainer.com

> 305/433-3160

> The Learning Curve, Inc.

>