Guest guest Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 The Lawliss group is legitimate based on the experiences I've had with them. Just remember, he is/they are good at self-promoting, too. Some have said there is a business relationship between Lawlis and Dr. Phil. Dave Siever at Mind-Alive may be able to give you some perspective on the " strength " of audio training as opposed to neurofeedback or audio-visual (AVE) training. My experience has been that aural/binaural training,though technically correct, is not as fast, efficient, or effective as either NFB or AVE. I personally doubt that I will invest in a BAUD as even an adjunct to NFB or AVE as I have with the Monroe group or DAVIDs. That being said, I have yet to try Lawliss' specific product. //Peder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 The Lawliss group is legitimate based on the experiences I've had with them. Just remember, he is/they are good at self-promoting, too. Some have said there is a business relationship between Lawlis and Dr. Phil. Dave Siever at Mind-Alive may be able to give you some perspective on the " strength " of audio training as opposed to neurofeedback or audio-visual (AVE) training. My experience has been that aural/binaural training,though technically correct, is not as fast, efficient, or effective as either NFB or AVE. I personally doubt that I will invest in a BAUD as even an adjunct to NFB or AVE as I have with the Monroe group or DAVIDs. That being said, I have yet to try Lawliss' specific product. //Peder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Dr Lawless was Dr. Phil's mentor. They have a long relationship. Per the show. _____________________________________________________________Click here to double your salary by becoming a medical transcriber. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Tim Thank you for the information on your success with the BAUD. I will have to look at it more closely. How do you use it - i.e. how many minutes per day, what time of day, what settings, how often, etc. How does it compare to HemiSync, AVE, etc. How do you integrate it with the BrainTrainer philosophy and protocols. Thank you//Peder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2008 Report Share Posted February 1, 2008 Thank you all for your replies about the BAUD Celine > > I don't have experience with the Baud but I wonder how it compares with Swingle's audios which are probably cheaper don't require a lot of training amd don't require another device to fiddle with and adjust. > Mark > Re: Re: Bioacoustical Utilization Device (BAUD), > > > Tim > > Thank you for the information on your success with the BAUD. I will have > to look at it more closely. How do you use it - i.e. how many minutes per > day, what time of day, what settings, how often, etc. How does it compare > to HemiSync, AVE, etc. How do you integrate it with the BrainTrainer > philosophy and protocols. Thank you//Peder > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.