Guest guest Posted December 6, 2008 Report Share Posted December 6, 2008 I've been mulling the following over: 1. I have colleagues who regularly do QEEGs. Some report that even though clients present with clear clinical conditions, the QEEG does not show normative excesses. 2. Some clients have a number of QEEGs on different systems ie different hardware and databases. There can be no concordance between the various QEEgs although sometimes a particlar EEG will seem to provide some suggestive training protocols when symtoms and neurophysiology are considered. 3. I can see an arguement for doing a QEEG in complex presentations. 4. It would seem a good step that if a QEEG has been used to provide a protocol at a site or a pair of sites that a TLC also be done at these sites before training commences. In that way there is EEG assessment information derived from the software and hardware that will be used in training. Concordance between the suggested QEEG protocol and the TLC protocol can be assessed and trainining decisions further refined. 5. The TLC provides additional information not from a database but from EEG metrics. Mark Baddeley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.