Guest guest Posted August 12, 2006 Report Share Posted August 12, 2006 Don't get too hung up on your counts. Have been alive for 24 years now with a CD4 count that has fluctuated between 11 and 460. Take care of yourself, don't party too much and decide to stay alive. You'll be fine. > >To: PozHealth >Subject: Re: Can you explain low CD4 counts at a low viral >load? more info >Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:28:43 -0000 > > >Truly fascinating. The discordant piece in your situation is that your >T4 numbers are so very low 257-263 and 17.1% - 18%. This is not typical >of people with a strong immune response to HIV. If you are truly in the >category of people whose immune system can control HIV your T4 numbers >should rise back to normal over time. > >Since it is a strong possibility that you have Subtype E HIV, most >common in Thailand, there is still a question how reliable viral load >tests are - since the tests were not designed for Subtype E and there is >a known question about reliability with this Subtype. If your virus >hasn't been typed in the lab to determine if it is Subtype E, I think it >might help answer what is really going on. > >The progression of Subtype E HIV is also somewhat different. This is a >presentation regarding the progression of patients in Thailand with >Subtype E virus from the 2001 Conference on Retroviruses and >Opportunistic Infections. > >http://www.retroconference.org/2001/posters/207.pdf ><http://www.retroconference.org/2001/posters/207.pdf> > >You'll notice (on Slide 14) that for some reason, in these people >studied, survival with Subtype E HIV takes a big decline around 8 years >after infection. For some reason, survival with Subtype E is not as >favorable as Subtype B, although those with Subtype E virus and low >viral load have a dramatically better survival history. The treatments >which are most effective for Subtype E are also somewhat different. So >typing your virus would be important if you haven't already done so. > >I have a friend in Sweden who has a very high level of T Regulatory >Cells (T4) and CNAR T8 cells. He has been HIV+ for six years. Initially, >his viral load was around 25,000 and his T4 numbers were 550 and 26%. > >But without drugs and not needing Interleukin-2, since his TReg and CNAR >was already high, his viral load is now 1,100 and his T4 numbers are 980 >and 35%. Studies of prostitutes in Africa who are HIV negative, yet >probably exposed to HIV on a daily basis, have even higher levels of T >Regualtory Cells and CNAR T8 cells - these are your immune system's key >to controlling HIV. So if you have the option of doing so, you could >also measure your percentage of T Rregulatory cells - CD4+/CD25+ is a >good approximation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Healthyseed found this " Question and Answer " from UCSF, which >appears to > > > explain his paradox of an abnormally low viral load test results >with > > > sub-type E HIV. > > > > > > Can you explain low CD4 counts at a low viral load? > > > > > > May 16, 2000 -- Answered by ce Peiperl, MD, HIV InSite Medical > > > Editor > > > http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu/insite?page=ask-02-02 > > > <http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu/insite?page=ask-02-02> > > > > > > > > > Question: My friend was diagnosed with HIV in 1995. At that time, >his > > > CD4+ count was about 900/mm of blood and viral load approx. at 9,000 > > > copies/ml. He stayed at this CD4+ level for a couple of years, while >his > > > viral load went down to about 3,000/ml. In 1998, his T-cell count >took a > > > downward plunge at was at 69CD4+/mm. His viral load grew to 6,000 > > > copies. Last month, the results of Tcell and viral load tests were >CD4+ > > > at 34/mm and viral load at 11,000/ml. His doctor isn't certain why >this > > > (viral load), historically has been low. > > > > > > He has never taken antiretrovial medications, to date has not had an > > > opportunistic infection, but several years before, was tested + for >HBV. > > > Is there an explanation for this situation? I am an HIV community > > > educator and do a great deal of research to keep myself up to date >(as > > > much as possible). I have been unable to find info on my friend's > > > situation. What is his prognosis? Can you help? > > > > > > > > > Answer: It is not that unusual to have low CD4 counts at a >relatively > > > low viral load. Some subtypes of HIV-1 can produce falsely low >results > > > on certain viral load tests. (For example, the PCR viral load test >used > > > in many US labs can show falsely low levels of the subtype E virus > > > commonly found in Thailand.) If this person has a viral subtype more > > > common in Africa or Asia and has been getting PCR (Amplicor) viral >load > > > testing, then a bDNA (Quantiplex) viral load test might give a more > > > accurate result. But even with subtype B infection, which is most >common > > > in the US and western Europe, the effect of a given viral load on >the > > > T-cell count will vary from one person to another. > > > > > > The actual number of the viral load is less important than the >effect > > > the virus is having on the immune system, as shown by the CD4 count. > > > Accordingly, treatment guidelines recommend starting antiretroviral > > > treatment for HIV-infected individuals with low CD4 counts >regardless of > > > viral load. Based on the information presented, this person is at > > > serious risk of developing an opportunistic infection. He should >seek > > > medical care which will likely include prophylaxis against PCP and >MAC > > > infection, in addition to antiretroviral therapy. > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ Play Q6 for your chance to WIN great prizes. http://q6trivia.imagine-live.com/enca/landing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2006 Report Share Posted August 12, 2006 Don't get too hung up on your counts. Have been alive for 24 years now with a CD4 count that has fluctuated between 11 and 460. Take care of yourself, don't party too much and decide to stay alive. You'll be fine. > >To: PozHealth >Subject: Re: Can you explain low CD4 counts at a low viral >load? more info >Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:28:43 -0000 > > >Truly fascinating. The discordant piece in your situation is that your >T4 numbers are so very low 257-263 and 17.1% - 18%. This is not typical >of people with a strong immune response to HIV. If you are truly in the >category of people whose immune system can control HIV your T4 numbers >should rise back to normal over time. > >Since it is a strong possibility that you have Subtype E HIV, most >common in Thailand, there is still a question how reliable viral load >tests are - since the tests were not designed for Subtype E and there is >a known question about reliability with this Subtype. If your virus >hasn't been typed in the lab to determine if it is Subtype E, I think it >might help answer what is really going on. > >The progression of Subtype E HIV is also somewhat different. This is a >presentation regarding the progression of patients in Thailand with >Subtype E virus from the 2001 Conference on Retroviruses and >Opportunistic Infections. > >http://www.retroconference.org/2001/posters/207.pdf ><http://www.retroconference.org/2001/posters/207.pdf> > >You'll notice (on Slide 14) that for some reason, in these people >studied, survival with Subtype E HIV takes a big decline around 8 years >after infection. For some reason, survival with Subtype E is not as >favorable as Subtype B, although those with Subtype E virus and low >viral load have a dramatically better survival history. The treatments >which are most effective for Subtype E are also somewhat different. So >typing your virus would be important if you haven't already done so. > >I have a friend in Sweden who has a very high level of T Regulatory >Cells (T4) and CNAR T8 cells. He has been HIV+ for six years. Initially, >his viral load was around 25,000 and his T4 numbers were 550 and 26%. > >But without drugs and not needing Interleukin-2, since his TReg and CNAR >was already high, his viral load is now 1,100 and his T4 numbers are 980 >and 35%. Studies of prostitutes in Africa who are HIV negative, yet >probably exposed to HIV on a daily basis, have even higher levels of T >Regualtory Cells and CNAR T8 cells - these are your immune system's key >to controlling HIV. So if you have the option of doing so, you could >also measure your percentage of T Rregulatory cells - CD4+/CD25+ is a >good approximation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Healthyseed found this " Question and Answer " from UCSF, which >appears to > > > explain his paradox of an abnormally low viral load test results >with > > > sub-type E HIV. > > > > > > Can you explain low CD4 counts at a low viral load? > > > > > > May 16, 2000 -- Answered by ce Peiperl, MD, HIV InSite Medical > > > Editor > > > http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu/insite?page=ask-02-02 > > > <http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu/insite?page=ask-02-02> > > > > > > > > > Question: My friend was diagnosed with HIV in 1995. At that time, >his > > > CD4+ count was about 900/mm of blood and viral load approx. at 9,000 > > > copies/ml. He stayed at this CD4+ level for a couple of years, while >his > > > viral load went down to about 3,000/ml. In 1998, his T-cell count >took a > > > downward plunge at was at 69CD4+/mm. His viral load grew to 6,000 > > > copies. Last month, the results of Tcell and viral load tests were >CD4+ > > > at 34/mm and viral load at 11,000/ml. His doctor isn't certain why >this > > > (viral load), historically has been low. > > > > > > He has never taken antiretrovial medications, to date has not had an > > > opportunistic infection, but several years before, was tested + for >HBV. > > > Is there an explanation for this situation? I am an HIV community > > > educator and do a great deal of research to keep myself up to date >(as > > > much as possible). I have been unable to find info on my friend's > > > situation. What is his prognosis? Can you help? > > > > > > > > > Answer: It is not that unusual to have low CD4 counts at a >relatively > > > low viral load. Some subtypes of HIV-1 can produce falsely low >results > > > on certain viral load tests. (For example, the PCR viral load test >used > > > in many US labs can show falsely low levels of the subtype E virus > > > commonly found in Thailand.) If this person has a viral subtype more > > > common in Africa or Asia and has been getting PCR (Amplicor) viral >load > > > testing, then a bDNA (Quantiplex) viral load test might give a more > > > accurate result. But even with subtype B infection, which is most >common > > > in the US and western Europe, the effect of a given viral load on >the > > > T-cell count will vary from one person to another. > > > > > > The actual number of the viral load is less important than the >effect > > > the virus is having on the immune system, as shown by the CD4 count. > > > Accordingly, treatment guidelines recommend starting antiretroviral > > > treatment for HIV-infected individuals with low CD4 counts >regardless of > > > viral load. Based on the information presented, this person is at > > > serious risk of developing an opportunistic infection. He should >seek > > > medical care which will likely include prophylaxis against PCP and >MAC > > > infection, in addition to antiretroviral therapy. > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ Play Q6 for your chance to WIN great prizes. http://q6trivia.imagine-live.com/enca/landing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2006 Report Share Posted August 12, 2006 Don't get too hung up on your counts. Have been alive for 24 years now with a CD4 count that has fluctuated between 11 and 460. Take care of yourself, don't party too much and decide to stay alive. You'll be fine. > >To: PozHealth >Subject: Re: Can you explain low CD4 counts at a low viral >load? more info >Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:28:43 -0000 > > >Truly fascinating. The discordant piece in your situation is that your >T4 numbers are so very low 257-263 and 17.1% - 18%. This is not typical >of people with a strong immune response to HIV. If you are truly in the >category of people whose immune system can control HIV your T4 numbers >should rise back to normal over time. > >Since it is a strong possibility that you have Subtype E HIV, most >common in Thailand, there is still a question how reliable viral load >tests are - since the tests were not designed for Subtype E and there is >a known question about reliability with this Subtype. If your virus >hasn't been typed in the lab to determine if it is Subtype E, I think it >might help answer what is really going on. > >The progression of Subtype E HIV is also somewhat different. This is a >presentation regarding the progression of patients in Thailand with >Subtype E virus from the 2001 Conference on Retroviruses and >Opportunistic Infections. > >http://www.retroconference.org/2001/posters/207.pdf ><http://www.retroconference.org/2001/posters/207.pdf> > >You'll notice (on Slide 14) that for some reason, in these people >studied, survival with Subtype E HIV takes a big decline around 8 years >after infection. For some reason, survival with Subtype E is not as >favorable as Subtype B, although those with Subtype E virus and low >viral load have a dramatically better survival history. The treatments >which are most effective for Subtype E are also somewhat different. So >typing your virus would be important if you haven't already done so. > >I have a friend in Sweden who has a very high level of T Regulatory >Cells (T4) and CNAR T8 cells. He has been HIV+ for six years. Initially, >his viral load was around 25,000 and his T4 numbers were 550 and 26%. > >But without drugs and not needing Interleukin-2, since his TReg and CNAR >was already high, his viral load is now 1,100 and his T4 numbers are 980 >and 35%. Studies of prostitutes in Africa who are HIV negative, yet >probably exposed to HIV on a daily basis, have even higher levels of T >Regualtory Cells and CNAR T8 cells - these are your immune system's key >to controlling HIV. So if you have the option of doing so, you could >also measure your percentage of T Rregulatory cells - CD4+/CD25+ is a >good approximation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Healthyseed found this " Question and Answer " from UCSF, which >appears to > > > explain his paradox of an abnormally low viral load test results >with > > > sub-type E HIV. > > > > > > Can you explain low CD4 counts at a low viral load? > > > > > > May 16, 2000 -- Answered by ce Peiperl, MD, HIV InSite Medical > > > Editor > > > http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu/insite?page=ask-02-02 > > > <http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu/insite?page=ask-02-02> > > > > > > > > > Question: My friend was diagnosed with HIV in 1995. At that time, >his > > > CD4+ count was about 900/mm of blood and viral load approx. at 9,000 > > > copies/ml. He stayed at this CD4+ level for a couple of years, while >his > > > viral load went down to about 3,000/ml. In 1998, his T-cell count >took a > > > downward plunge at was at 69CD4+/mm. His viral load grew to 6,000 > > > copies. Last month, the results of Tcell and viral load tests were >CD4+ > > > at 34/mm and viral load at 11,000/ml. His doctor isn't certain why >this > > > (viral load), historically has been low. > > > > > > He has never taken antiretrovial medications, to date has not had an > > > opportunistic infection, but several years before, was tested + for >HBV. > > > Is there an explanation for this situation? I am an HIV community > > > educator and do a great deal of research to keep myself up to date >(as > > > much as possible). I have been unable to find info on my friend's > > > situation. What is his prognosis? Can you help? > > > > > > > > > Answer: It is not that unusual to have low CD4 counts at a >relatively > > > low viral load. Some subtypes of HIV-1 can produce falsely low >results > > > on certain viral load tests. (For example, the PCR viral load test >used > > > in many US labs can show falsely low levels of the subtype E virus > > > commonly found in Thailand.) If this person has a viral subtype more > > > common in Africa or Asia and has been getting PCR (Amplicor) viral >load > > > testing, then a bDNA (Quantiplex) viral load test might give a more > > > accurate result. But even with subtype B infection, which is most >common > > > in the US and western Europe, the effect of a given viral load on >the > > > T-cell count will vary from one person to another. > > > > > > The actual number of the viral load is less important than the >effect > > > the virus is having on the immune system, as shown by the CD4 count. > > > Accordingly, treatment guidelines recommend starting antiretroviral > > > treatment for HIV-infected individuals with low CD4 counts >regardless of > > > viral load. Based on the information presented, this person is at > > > serious risk of developing an opportunistic infection. He should >seek > > > medical care which will likely include prophylaxis against PCP and >MAC > > > infection, in addition to antiretroviral therapy. > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ Play Q6 for your chance to WIN great prizes. http://q6trivia.imagine-live.com/enca/landing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2006 Report Share Posted August 13, 2006 yes, all of the below, and particularly " decide to stay alive. " The Australian aborigines had a bone-pointing ritual in their culture, as a punishment. Those at whom the bone was pointed went off to die. We need to help get the bone-pointing out of the HIV story. Wish you another 24. > > Don't get too hung up on your counts. Have been alive for 24 years now with > a CD4 count that has fluctuated between 11 and 460. Take care of yourself, > don't party too much and decide to stay alive. You'll be fine. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.