Guest guest Posted June 10, 2008 Report Share Posted June 10, 2008 For scientists to work with industry to create or improve products is more or less how commercial innovation works, so it's no surprise that this interchange exists in sports nutrition. It extends to sponsorship of sports organisations as well of course -- a great testing ground for new product ideas. Where it gets murky, in my view, is when an individual scientist has a core financial interest in a product and also publishes in the scientific literature about that product, or at least a representation of it. Not necessarily unethical, just murky. Gympie, Australia > > >>> Carruthers, one thing to note about the study by > Cribb.... He is a consultant for a certain company that supplies > the 'PRO+CHO' supplements that are used in these studies. This study > is very similar to " Cribb, P., , A., Carey, M. and , A. > (2006). The Effect of Whey Isolate and Resistance Training Whey > Isolate and showed gains of 5kg of muscle in previously trained > individuals in 10 weeks... pretty astounding results...>>> > > *** > Hi good point, most nutritional experts including many of those cited in the articles from NYtimes work in tandem within areas of research and consultancy. Ivy (Accelerade), Berardi (Surge), Cribb (AST), Loon / Burke (Endurox), Jeukendrup (Powerbar), Tarnopolsky (Gatorade). Furthermore, a great deal of research on supplements is financed by the supplement companies themselves. > > Carruthers > Wakefield, UK > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.