Guest guest Posted April 10, 2008 Report Share Posted April 10, 2008 To all, ...of possible interest: Jamil Zaki, Niall Bolger, Ochsner (2008) It Takes Two: The Interpersonal Nature of Empathic Accuracy Psychological Science 19(4),399-404 [April 2008] NB: All authors are at Columbia University. Non-members of the APS may find direct access is blocked; so I've reproduced the Abstract below. My comment follows that. -------------------- ABSTRACT [Paragraph breaks are mine. -wdl] Although current theories suggest that affective empathy (perceivers' experience of social targets' emotions) should contribute to empathic accuracy (perceivers' ability to accurately assess targets' emotions), extant research has failed to consistently demonstrate a correspondence between them. We reasoned that prior null findings may be attributable to a failure to account for the fundamentally interpersonal nature of empathy, and tested the prediction that empathic accuracy may depend on both targets' tendency to express emotion and perceivers' tendency to empathically share that emotion. Using a continuous affect-rating paradigm, we found that perceivers' trait affective empathy was unrelated to empathic accuracy unless targets' trait expressivity was taken into account: Perceivers' trait affective empathy predicted accuracy only for expressive targets. These data suggest that perceivers' self-reported affective empathy can indeed predict their empathic accuracy, but only when targets' expressivity allows their thoughts and feelings to be read. -------------------- What this means is that BOTH partners in a relationship must be capable, themselves, of displaying " affective empathy " (show emotion) for ONE of them to be able to " read " the other with any accuracy. This could be *very* important in AS/NT relationships: one partner (usually the AS) typically isn't very emotional (overtly) and seems to have little empathy. In this case, *neither* partner will be able to " read " the other accurately. Most especially the *NT*, regardless of what they feel their skill may be in " reading " others, frequently will be wrong. As I and others have said here often: " It takes two to tango " - one can't do it alone. That goes especially for NTs who believe they've unilaterally got their AS partner " figured out " . NB: BUT... another article in the same journal/issue points out that purely cognitive perception can and often does compensate for empathic lacks in adults. That might imply an AS (cognitively well-endowed, often) could " read " their NT partner better than the NT can read them. Together, these results imply a reversal of the current " conventional wisdom " regarding communication and other " social " aspects of AS/NT relationships. Worth pondering. - Bill, 75, AS; married 40-yrs, 2nd time 'round. -- WD " Bill " Loughman - Berkeley, California USA http://home.earthlink.net/~wdloughman/wdl.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.