Guest guest Posted January 13, 2006 Report Share Posted January 13, 2006 Sanity is being demonstarted in Canada! . . . Rogene =============================== http://news./s/cpress/20060113/ca_pr_on_he/health_breast_implants_2 Safety of Silicone Breast Implants Still Unclear: Expert Panel SHERYL UBELACKER Thu Jan 12, 9:00 PM ET TORONTO (CP) - Health Canada should set up and administer a registry of women with breast implants and seek more information about the long-term safety of the silicone-gel form of the devices, an expert scientific panel says in its long-awaited report. The report, made public Thursday on Health Canada's website, will be used in part to decide if sales of the controversial devices should be resumed in Canada. Silicone breast implants were taken off the Canadian market by manufacturers in 1992 - 30 years after they were first approved - when Health Canada raised concerns about their safety. The devices were also removed from the U.S. market. " Now that we've received the report, it becomes an element of the body of evidence that needs to be reviewed in order to make a decision as to whether or not the gel-filled breast implants should be authorized for sale in Canada, " Health Canada spokeswoman Nathalie Lalonde said from Ottawa. " We really want to make sure the decision is based on the most information that we are possibly able to go and get, " Lalonde said. " All that can take a bit of time, so we're talking months here, not weeks. " In its report, the 13-member expert panel said that while it had received sufficient data from manufacturers to show how the devices perform after being implanted in a woman's body, " they do not address all aspects of long-term safety. " " Annual reports must be submitted that update on ongoing studies, particularly up to 10-year followup, " said the report to Health Canada. Thousands of women in Canada and the United States have joined class-action lawsuits, alleging that the implants caused auto-immune diseases and vascular conditions after silicone leaked into their bodies from ruptured implants. At a public forum in Ottawa before the panel in late September, manufacturers Mentor Corp. and Inamed Corp. said their new silicone implants are not only safer (less likely to rupture or leak) than older versions, but they offer superior breast augmentation and reconstruction options for women compared to approved saline implants. However, the panel said in its report that questions about the potential health effects of exposure to low molecular-weight silicones had not been sufficiently addressed, and it recommends that manufacturers be required to demonstrate that " migrated silicone provides acceptable risks of hypersensitivity and auto-immunity by a critical review of company and literature data and, if necessary, by undertaking studies in animal models. " While the report said that potential means of rupture had been adequately studied, it is uncertain how long the implants will last. " The patient labelling should acknowledge that the implant is not a lifetime device and that most likely the implant will need to be replaced with subsequent surgery, " the report said. A national breast implant registry should be established by Health Canada, as well as a program to help women make an informed decision about having silicone breast implant surgery, the panel said. Ann Pederson of the B.C. Centre of Excellence for Women's Health said her organization has been pushing for years for a registry that would track women with breast implants to see if the devices are indeed safe over time. " Obviously, we're delighted that the panel has recommended the establishment of a breast implant registry and they've suggested that Health Canada be responsible for that, " Pederson said from Vancouver. " I think that's very, very positive, because that will allow us to continue to gather evidence to answer some of the questions that the panel was not charged with asking, but which are part of the larger domain of concern with regard to the safety and efficacy of breast implants. " Lalonde said a registry is one way to " mitigate the risk. " " And we're certainly going to look at that possibility. It's not the only way to mitigate the risk. We need to look at all the options before a decision is made. " The panel also had concerns about information provided to patients about the devices, saying the product should come with information - and it should also be available to patients considering the surgery in both printed material and via the Internet. Labelling of the product should include warnings about possible contraindications, the report said. " Patients presenting with depression and/or an eating disorder, if untreated, should be referred for treatment before considering breast augmentation surgery. If they are in treatment, communication between the plastic surgeon and the treating mental health professional is strongly recommended. " Although no causal link was established between breast augmentation surgery and suicide, patients with psychiatric disorders such as depression and eating disorders should postpone the decision for breast augmentation until the complete resolution of the depression and/or the eating disorder. " The panel also " strongly " advised Health Canada that only Royal College-certified plastic surgeons, specifically trained, be allowed to implant the devices. - On the Net: Health Canada: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/index-e.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.