Guest guest Posted February 25, 2006 Report Share Posted February 25, 2006 DCCO17006752 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Services Food and Drug Administration CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED WARNING LETTER December 30, 1991 Dan M. , Jr. President DOW Corning 5677 Airline Road Arlington, Tennessee 38002 Dear Mr. : On September 26, 1991, the Food and Drug Administration (PDA) published a Federal Register notice on silicone gel-filled and silicon, inflatable breast prostheses (56 FR 49098) that was designed to promote the dissemination of accurate information on the risks associated with breast implants to women considering implantation while FDA had under review the application for these implants. It included guidance for manufacturers and physicians on the type of information FDA believes is required. This notice stated that FDA would regard a manufacturer as misbranding its breast prosthesis under section 502(a) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act if labeling does not provide adequate written information to patients on the risks associated with these devices. As part of its efforts to ensure that consumers receive accurate information about the risks of breast implants, FDA staff have made calls to the Dow Corning Implant Information Center. The Center's toll free number has appeared in newspaper advertisements directed at consumers who wanted " Accurate information about breast implants...based on 30 years of valid scientific research. " In responding to these calls, the Centers staff have made verbal statements which are not factual or have been used in a confusing or misleading context. These statements overstate the safety of breast implants and minimize known or suspected side effects. The do not reflect a balanced presentation of the safety issues which have led to FDA'S requirement that premarket approval applications be submitted for breast implants. FDA has documented the following examples of false and/or misleading statements: - Regarding the safety of breast implants: The FDA advisory panel that met on November 12, 13, and 14, 1991 said that breast implants were safe. Scientific data and research show that breast implants are 100% safe. After thirty years of study conducted with patients, there have never been health problems with implants or silicone. Breast implants are safe. - In response to questions regarding joint pain: has been very sensationalized and never diagnosed by a physician to be related to implants. It's rheumatoid arthritis which many women get. It's never been proven or linked to breast implants. - Regarding gel bleed: a minute amount of gel, less than half a teaspoon, which doesn't go anywhere. - Regarding rupture: results from a traumatic incident, usually from an accident, like a car accident. Results from an incident such as being hit in the chest with a two by four. (rupture) has happened less than 1% in 2 million women. - Regarding migration of silicone: Extensive studies on women and animals reveal the normal reaction is for the silicone to get to the lymph glands and then form microfascia. It means that the cell fingers move toward the lymph glands. When it moves across the tissue point it is a matter of years so don't worry, if you are thin this can easily be detected and corrected by your doctor...It is not possible for the silicone to go to the internal organs because it is not scientifically possible for the silicone to get into your spleen, kidneys, etc. - Regarding autoimmune disease: The rate of connective tissue disease for women with breast implants is the same as the general population. of women...It must be a genetic glitch...Silicone breast implants have never been linked to autoimmune or connective tissue disease in. any studies ever done. - Regarding cancer: There is no link to cancer at all - there is no increase in breast cancer from implants, if anything it is less. - In discussing the known complication of capsular contracture, an extremely misleading comparison was made to childbirth: But remember, you can have complications when you have a baby, yet people do it all the time. The above are offered as examples and may not necessarily reflect all of the false or misleading information being distributed through the Center. These statements, and others that are not consistent with the guidance FDA issued in its September Federal Register notice, misrepresent the status of the science and the advisory panel's actions. While Dow Corning is not required to maintain this telephone service, if it undertakes to do so, it must provide accurate information. FDA expects that any information provided will offer a proper balance of the known and suspected risks as well as the benefits of silicone gel filled breast prostheses. You should take immediate action to eliminate dissemination of false and/or misleading information by Dow Corning . Please notifythis office in writing by close of business. January 2, 1992, of the specific corrective steps you have taken. Your response should be sent to Watchko, office of Compliance and Surveillance, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 1390 Piccard Drive, Rockville, MD 20850. Sincerely yours, (signed) M. Director Office of Compliance and Surveillance Center for Devices and Radiological Health CC: Lawrence A. President Dow Corning P.O. Box 994 Midland, Michigan 48686-0994 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.