Guest guest Posted February 26, 2006 Report Share Posted February 26, 2006 DCC017001498 November 5, 1992 Toronto Sun BACTERIA IN BREAST IMPLANTS? MONTREAL (CP) - Ottawa chemist Pierre Blais and colleagues at Laval University in Quebec City say they have found large colonies of germs in surgically removed breast implants. " We found huge amounts of infectious materials in both saline-filled and silicone-gel implants, " Blais said. The implants were removed mostly from Canadian and American women who were experiencing infection, respiratory and immune-system problems and swelling and fever, Blais said. " A couple of implants were so contaminated with fungi and other germs that they had turned coal black. " Blais and his colleagues are using high-powered microscopes to examine the germs. But " in some cases, we could easily see signs of the infected materials without a microscope, " Blais said. Some of the saline implants " have poorly designed valves that unfortunately can allow protein and plasma from the woman to seep into the liquid. " ========================================= November 5, 1992 Montreal Gazette LAVAL TEAM FINDS GERMS FLOURISHING IN BREAST IMPLANTS Devices studied after removal Ottawa chemist Pierre Blais and colleagues at University Laval in Quebec City have found large colonies of germs in surgically removed breast implants. " We're finding huge amounts of infectious materials in both saline-filled and silicone-gel filled breast implants that have been removed mostly from Canadian and American women who are experiencing infections, respiratory and immune-system problems, swelling and fever, " Blais said in an interview this week. " A couple of implants were so contaminated with fungi and other germs that they had turned coal black, " he said. Blais and his colleagues are using high-powered microscopes to examine the germs. But " in some cases, we could easily see signs of the infected materials without a microscope, " Blais said. " We're talking about grams of infected materials, not tiny amounts. It includes bacteria exotic fungi some of which grow like miniature mushrooms. " All breast implants have been known to have a small chance of causing infection. But this is the first systematic investigation of infectious materials trapped inside implants. Some of the saline implants studied " have poorly designed valves that unfortunately can allow protein and plasma from the woman to seep into the liquid, " Blais said. " This may allow the germs to proliferate. And when some of these colonies get big enough, the germs could release toxins that could affect body tissue and nerves. " " The greatest danger to women with contaminated implants is that the infectious material could spread through the body if the implants leak or burst, " he said. " Once infection is in the body, the immune system would be forced to react and it could trigger an inflammatory process. " So far the chemists have studied 20 sets of saline-filled implants from various manufacturers. All the implants had some germs. " The variety and high degree of contamination suggest that manufacturing problems may be at fault, particularly inadequate sterilization, " Blais said. But he said he had no proof that this was the case. " Nor is there any way of knowing yet how many of the several million sets of implants inserted in women in North America, mostly in the last seven years, have been contaminated by genus, " he said. " We've only recently started looking at infection in implants and so we don't know how widespread this problem is. " Blais cautioned that women with implants shouldn't jump to conclusions on the basis of early study results because little is known yet about breast implant contamination and the processes that might cause harm. Since 1983, doctors, patients and lawyers representing women have been sending removed breast implants to Blais and the Laval team, which is led by chemist Guidoin, an implant expert. Blais and Guidoin have data on 1,400 sets of implants showing how they change or break down in the body. Blais is to present evidence from the study of contaminated implants at a breast implant conference in Cleveland, Ohio, this weekend. A moratorium on silicone gel-filled breast implants began in the U. & and Canada last January after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration reviewed safety data on several products and found the data inadequate. The implants are now available to women in the U.S. who enroll in limited studies. But saline-filled implants remain widely available in the U.S. and Canada. Norman , an implant expert at s Hopkins University in Baltimore, MD, told The Gazette yesterday that he has reviewed the findings of implant contamination with Blais at length, and the electron-microscope pictures " show absolutely unacceptable levels of contamination. " , who has served on an FDA advisory committee on breast implants, and Blais's work is raising " root questions about the lack of [government] regulation of something as basic as proper sterilization of implants. " He said the fact that regulatory agencies in Canada and the U.S. neglected to establish registries of removed implants so that they could be properly studied " now prevents us from telling the public what the actual risk may be. " " Unfortunately, it's been common for plastic surgeons and manufacturers to dispose of removed implants, probably because of their concerns about possible lawsuits. " The FDA now requires the registration of women involved in breast-implant tests. said Blais and his colleagues are the only ones who have been systematically studying removed breast implants. McGhan Medical Inc. of Santa Barbara, Calif, and Mentor Corp. also of Santa Barbara, are the two remaining makers of saline and silicone-gel implants in the U.S. Several manufacturers withdrew from the business last year following negative FDA assessments of their products. Dennis Condon, president of Mentor's surgical division, said he won't comment on Blais and Guidoin's findings until he sees their report. At McGhan, recent sales of silicone-gel implants were stopped after an FDA inspection last April found lapses in sterilization as well as inadequate quality control and record keeping said FDA spokesman Cruzan. Before McGhan can sell its silicone-gel implants for test purposes, the company must convince the FDA that it has made changes in the manufacturing plant. McGhan sent a statement to the Gazette yesterday saying that it will continue to work with the FDA to improve its manufacturing process so that production of implants may resume in the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.