Guest guest Posted February 24, 2006 Report Share Posted February 24, 2006 Subj: Part 3 of 4 - Court Documents: Manufacturers' Internal Memos From anonymous sister - scanned but not corrected - possibly from the Catch files THE HEYER-SCHULTE HOT MEMOS: Baxter International Note: American Hospital Supply Corporation had much earlier purchased Dow Chemical's Bioscience Enterprise, Inc. The Heyer Schulte Corp. was then a subsidiary of the American Hospital Supply Corporation. As Baxter Travenol Labs, Baxter Travenol had previously tested breast implants for Heyer Schulte Corporation. This testing was done BEFORE Baxter Travenol Labs purchased American Hospital Supply Corporation and Heyer Schulte. Later, when Baxter Travenol Labs had purchased American Hospital Supply Corporation AND Heyer Schulte, it then changed its name to become Baxter International. Heyer-Schulte was a medial devices subsidiary company of The American Hospital Supply Corporation. In 1972, it lured several scientists and salesmen from Dow Corning to start their own breast implant business, The McGhan Corp. McGhan of The Dow Corning Corp., led the group. Two years later, in 1974, Don McGhan started his own breast implant company, McGhan Medical Corporation in Santa Barbara, California. The Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. purchased McGhan Medical. Don McGhan then formed another company, Mentor Corp. The FDA is still allowing Don McGhan's second company, The Mentor Corp., to manufacture breast implants. The Women now must sign AN INFORMED CONSENT FORM, and the company MUST maintain a patient database. The Heyer-Schulte Hot Memos also reveal the deliberate and massive " corporate cover-up " and also, the " intermarriage corporate connections " of these corporations. Many of the breast implant scientists, engineers, etc., made the implant circuit and worked at each of the manufacturer's plants. They all knew each other. HEYER SCHULTE HOT MEMOS: Document #13: Baxter International - Heyer Schulte Baxter 78608,78609,78610, 78611,78612, 78613,7861478615,7861678617,78618 J. Rudy, Heyer-Schulte Corp. Date: July 14, 1976 From: G. Frugard SUBJECT: TRIP TO DOW CORNING There are both positive and negative aspects to my trip to Dow Corning. On the positive side, I feel that I was successful in bringing back a comprehensive summary (much of it verbatim) of all their animal data, or at least all that I was given access to. The negative aspect is that the data doesn't answer the key questions I presented to Dow concerning migration and the consequences. Also, as you will see, many of these experiments were not well controlled. (He met with Joe Radzius, Dow Corning attorney, and FDA and legal liaison who knows Jim Rudy well and sends his regards.) The format of our meeting will probably be used by Dow Corning with other interested parties, due, for the most part, to Dow's concern over making statements concerning the safety and efficacy of their material, which may be difficult to substantiate (my interpretation) based on conversation. Dow Corning is concerned about the Amendments to the Food and Drug Commission (FDA) and what will be required of them. Top management is apprehensive about the withdrawal of General Electric and Rhone-Poulenc and others from the medical segments of the elastomer market. Whether or not we want to be more specific and emphatic about the possible hazards of uncontained silicone is a decision that will need to be made. A general summary of such complications would include: (1-4 and 5: migration of the silicone, with mild to severe consequences, including reduction of (blanked out)....breast size and absorption of the silicone by the blood and lymph systems, resulting in damage to the liver and kidneys. Epidermal response was focal and consisted of sicharosis, a canthosis and hyperkeratosis. The dermal reaction was situationed beneath the epidermal lesion and consisted of a small focus of fibroblasts and capillary proliferation accompanied by a mononuclear cell inflammatory infiltration. Main reaction of test group: Mononuclear infiltration; foreign body giant cells; almost all minimal or minimal to moderate connective tissue proliferation. Document #14 Baxter International #78611 Biometric Testing, Inc. Biometric Laboratory, New Jersey Rabbit Implant With Histopathology Of Gel Implants: Twenty-one days past implants animals killed. An autopsy was performed on each rabbit. All tissues and organs fixed pending instructions from Dow. (No instructions were sent.) Findings: Histopath exam - of muscle sites revealed mild to acute inflammatory reaction. The reaction (at every site) was characterized by a typical inflammatory cell infiltrate with or without fibroblastic activity. ..... " 14 day - death - rabbit died 4 days past implant: pulmonary congestion, G.I. hemorrhaging and general " atrophy of all major organs. " Reference # A-1544: March 6, 1975 Chief Investigator: Carson, Ph.D. He viewed the Dog Study and copied verbatim: Baxter Id. #78616,78617,78618. See Below: Study: Chronic Implantation Studies of Polysiloxanes in Dogs. Document #15: HRONIC IMPLANTATION STUDIES OF POLYSILOXANES IN DOGS: Laboratory: Food and Drug Research Laboratories Maurice Avenue at 58th Street Maspath, New York Chief Investigator: Carson, Ph.D., Director, Biological Division REFERENCE: Report: Chronic Implantation Studies of Polysiloxanes in Dogs: Covers three-year studies of effects in dogs of implanted plastic materials in both cured and uncured states and in physical forms of solid film, perforated film, sponge amorphousforms and miniature artificial breasts over protracted periods. STUDY DESCRIPTION: Pure bred beagles 5-7 months age. Each sample implanted in four replicates which were excised, one or two at a time at three, nine and twenty-four or thirty-six months. RESULTS: " The site of the intramuscular implant DCX-0885 was surrounded by a lining of granulamatous inflammation tissue in one dog and hyalinized connective tissue reaction of 3+ in another and a fibrous reaction 1+ in a third animal. CONCLUSION: Table #1: Study Results for DCX-3-0885: (a) The conclusion reached in study #1: " perhaps all gels were reactive. " ( Concerning migration: Study #IV indicates that the gel migrates at least into the capsule, " ....multiple small oval spaces containingfragments of clear (nonfibrogenic) test material were often present in the connective tissue capsule that surrounded the main implant site. " Unfortunately, the data collected in this study does not answer questions concerning migration, even though that was the main objective (of the study.) Attachments: Page two of letter to Heyer-Schulte from Dow concerning disclosure, signed by Mac stating that: I complied with their request for copies of my notes. Frugard GF/id Attachments: Page two of letter to Heyer-Schulte from Dow concerning disclosure, signed by Mac stating that: I complied with their request for copies of my notes. Document #16: Ineroffice Correspondence Heyer Schulte Corporation Date: October 17, 1975 From: Jim Rudy Sub: Mammaries Account Representatives and Regional Managers: Regional Managers Ray Hanacek East* Rudi Schulte TRADE SECRET MB 184487,184488 Since my arrival at Heyer-Schulte, I have been taught that " soft is good " in discussing mammaries, especially gel-filled mammaries....with these considerations in mind, two weeks ago Dick Polito obtained for us twelve mammaries of McGhan manufacture and a similar quantify of Dow-Coring units. These were delivered along with a similar quantify of Heyer-Schulte mammaries to the people at the Corporate Technology Center in Santa Ana for comparative physical testing. Gel viscosity was compared by placing samples from each manufacturer in a cylindrical container as pictured and measuring the time for a steel ball to fall through the mass. The results indicate a startling difference. Time for the steel ball to fall through gels of each manufacturer were: Heyer-Schulte - 4075 seconds Dow Corning - 3330 seconds McGhan 55 seconds. No wonder McGhan's (3-M) feels softer. Their gel is virtually not crosslinked. Document #17 Heyer-Schulte: Interoffice Memo Date: October 30, 1975 From: Jim Rudy, President of Heyer Schulte Beverly Siow cc: Joe Utt, Tom Hyans, East Attched is a copy of " Injectable Fluid Silicone Therapy - Human Morbidity and Mortality " by Ellenbogen, M. D.; Rita Ellenbogen, M. D., Leonard Rubin, M. D. This paper describes problems relating to physical migration Including Liver dysfunction, and foreign body granuloma inn four victims of silicone injection. It is my understanding that similar mononuclear and giant cell reaction results in some patients wherein silicone gel has escaped from the shell. Jim Rudy JR:ja (Note: And the silicone envelope). Document #18 Interoffice Memo TRADE SECRET MB184489 Heyer-Schulte Date: November 20, 1975 From: Jim Rudy, President Sub: More on Mammary Safety vs. Performance We are working on preparation of the gel filled mammary comparisons by an independent lab, which I promised in my letter of October 17, 1975. I am advised that some significant number of customers (plastic surgeons,) don't particularly doubt the conclusions, but are not impressed with the importance of gel-viscosity or shell strength. I suggest that this is a naive position and one which will be changing in the relatively near future. To illustrate, Heyer-Schulte now has 15 active law suits involving leaking mammary implants. Of these fifteen, nine occurred in 1975 alone. At the ASPRS (American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons) in Toronto, I attended a session and was amazed at the Naiveteacute; of several plastic surgeons who rose to discuss ruptured implants. They seemed to believe that all gel was either " cohesive " or " non-cohesive " , and that it would be sold in a mammary implant only if it were the former.....I believe these factors are important. I recognize that this type of information must be used carefully, as it is not our policy to sell by knocking competition. .....the hazards which could be associated with use of our products and with which they may not be as familiar as they could be. Jim Rudy - cc: Ray Hanacek, East, Rudi Schulte Document #19 Heyer-Schulte Corporation American Hospital Supply Corporation/(Baxter International Corp.) MB184491 400 Pine Avenue Goleta, California March 29, 1976 Cauley , M.D. 1010 East Third Street Chatanooga, Tennessee 37403 Dear Dr. : This letter is to follow-up and confirm elements of our telephone conversation of March 23. We were concerned with one of your patients who had been augmented with.......until approximately 10 months post-implant. Despite apparently commonly held opinions to the contrary, it is not surprising that migration of the gel occurred........In such cases, it has been our practice to attempt to maintain rapport with such patients by reacting rapidly with a humanistic concern and expressing a willingness to minimize any financial impact that such disappointing results incur. Accordingly, without implying liability on our part; but in an effort to help this patient and maintain good relations with our public, we would be happy to supply replacement implants and if the situation warrants, we could also consider defraying hospital expenses. Please keep us posted on ANY situation which develops with this patient. Sincerely, A. Rudy, President; JR;je Document #20 Baxter International: #79038 Memo: March 5, 1976 Bob: Here are the mammary papers. I've separated them into two piles. The Folder with the pink star on the front contains those papers (arranged alphabetically by author) which seem to me most useful for extracting data.....the other pile contains the papers which seemed to me less useful.....papers dealing mainly with matters of surgical technique (which I assume we want to say little---if anything-about.... Betsy. Document #21 WARNINGS BAX 79042-79045 " .....the silicone rubber mammary envelope has a law tear strength....note: Gel prostheses may be easily ruptured when still hot from the autoclave....the gel interior of these products is vulcanized to minimize the migration of gel should a rupture occur in the silicone envelope. However, should the silicone envelope be ruptured, Heyer-Schulte cannot guarantee reliable gel containment, and the prosthesis should be replaced. Whether or not we want to be more specific and emphatic about the possible hazards of un-contained silicone is a decision that will need to be made. Most pertinent here are the papers on the complications of silicone injections: " Ellenboggen, Injectable Fluid Silicone Therapy, " " Symmara, Silicone Mastitis in Topless Waitresses. " and most especially the paper by Boo-Cahi on " The Complications of Augmentation Mammaplasty by Silicone Injects, " which discusses the problems resulting from injecting a vulcanized (gel-type) silicone. A general summary of such complications would include: (1). one recorded case of intravascular injection of silicone resulting in death; (2). hypo-pigmentation of the breast; (3). hard, nodular lumps; (4). silicone mastitis; (5). migration of the silicone, with mild to severe consequences, including reduction of (.......whited out) and absorption of the silicone by the blood and lymph systems, resulting in damage to the liver and kidneys; See also Goldwyn, " An Unusual Complication of the Use of the Cronin Implant for Augumentation Mammaplasty, " who reports a case of wound infection. Cronin and Greenbert, " Our experiences with the Silastick Gel Breast Prosthesis, " pg. 4. Guardian, " Complications of Breast Implantations, Pg 32; infection is manifested by swelling, tenderness, pain, fever and a positive culture. It may appear in the immediate postoperative period or weeks, months, or even years after insertion of the implant. IN THE ABSENCE OF CLASSIC SYMPTOMS, sub-acute or chronic infections may be DIFFICULT to diagnose. " , " Silastic Breast Implants: Coping with Complications, p. 590, neural complications, etc., have been reported. See also articles by Freeman, Courtiss, Gurdin, , Owsley, McKinney, McDougall, Corso, De Cholnoky, Rubin, Berens, , Conway, , Synder, , Brauer, Goldwyn, Psillakis, Bing, Brown, Dunsif, Stubenbord, Conway, Schwager, Gutherie, Imber, Lipshutz, Little, Nedelman, Mazzoni, Peacock, Van Winkle, Ross, Ballantyne, etc. " (Published articles by Plastic Surgeons). Notation: Houston physician, Dr. Cronin, was the inventor of the first mammary implant. The next three pages reference articles written by plastic surgeons relating to complications from silicone envelope and silicone gel implants. Papers written by world-wide plastic surgeons as far back as late 1960s and submitted to their journals but never disclosed to the public. The Plastic Surgeons & Reconstructive Society (ASPRS), and the AMA, knew as early as the 1960's of the complications and dangers, but did not advise the public. They kept implanting. They got richer. They and the AMA joined forces with the breast implant manufacturers: i.e. the infamous Mayo Clinic, Harvard Report, and the New England Journal Reports with their financial contributions. Document #22 Veterans Administration Hospital Palo Alto, California 94304 When replying, refer to 640/112 Baxter International #37080 April 29, 1976 Mr. Ken Eckhardt Product Director, Plastic Surgery Heyer-Schulte Corporation P. O. Box 946 Goleta, California 93017 Dear Mr. Eckhardt: Enclosed is a copy of our paper on " Local Tissue Reaction to Ruptured Thin Gel Prostheses. " This paper has been submitted for publication in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. The enclosed manuscript and illustrations will also serve as our final report to you on the research project on this problem which was partially funded by your company. Should you have any further questions, we would be more than happy to endeavor to supply the answers. We are still more than anxious to complete our study on the effects of steroids as the capsule formation around these implants. A small pilot study has yielded some very interesting results, but we are unable to go ahead with the full study, because we are not yet in receipt of the total number of 60 small implants that you had earlier promised to supply us. We are now in receipt of a total of 19 implants. We would appreciate receiving the balance for a total of 60 as soon as it is convenient for you. Yours sincerely, Lars M. Vistines, M. C. Chief, Surgical Service Enclosure: Document #23 Report: From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Veterans Hospital and Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California. Supplied by the Heyer-Schulte Corporation, Santa Barbara, California Baxter 37081 " Experimental Study of Tissue Response to Ruptured Gel Filled mammary Prostheses " : W. Bentley, M.D., Lars M. Vistnes, M.D., A.Ksander, M.D., C. Fogarty, M. D. Funded, researched in 1976). Due to the length of the document, only portions are given. Page 1: Baxter International #37082 " Over the past decade, gel filled prostheses have been used for mammary augumentation. The resulting encasing fibrous capsule has continued to be a significant problem. Tissue response to the various synthetic materials has been well documented, and recently the relationship between alloplastic breast prostheses and capsule formation has been explored experimentally in this laboratory. We felt this was a timely study because some plastic surgeons have advocated the purposeful incision into the prosthesis wall to release gel into the fibrous capsule as a solution to the hard breast after augmentation....The unruptured, but not the ruptured specimens, showed a significantly thicker capsule superficially....in the un-ruptured specimens a local acute inflammatory response was noted at 10 days with polymer nuclear leukocytes and round cells incorporated in the collegeous capsule (Fig. 1) (Note: the ruptured specimens had dispersed the silicone throughout the body.) ....Figure 3 In the ruptured specimens, gel globules (which on the histological section showed as vacuoles) were seen in the capsule at 10 days, while at 42 days, the gel, in smaller globules, had migrated into the surrounding connective tissue (Figure 4). A local inflammatory response with fibroblastic activity and giant cell formation was elicited in these areas. Some of the ruptured prostheses showed no evidence of gel remaining in the silicone envelope at the time of sacrifice. Seven out of 15 specimens in the 41 day ruptured group were lost due to extensive interaction with the surrounding tissue that interfered with dissection. DISCUSSION: This study not only documents, under controlled conditions, the mammary prosthetic implants elicit an inflammatory response with resultant fibrous capsule formation, but also suggests that ruptured implants favor formation of a thicker capsule. Also worth noting, is the apparent migration of the gel away from the implantation site to unknown locations and with unknown effects. The present tendency by manufacturers of breast implants towards ever thinner envelopes and a " filler " that is getting further away from gel and closer to silicone liquid, must be looked at in the light of these experimental findings, and the question must be asked whether the possible advantages of these changes outweigh the disadvantages. SUMMARY: .....capsule thickness was significantly increased in the ruptured prostheses in response to the exuded gel. The gel migrated through the capsule and into the surrounding connective tissue eliciting an inflammatory response with capsule thickening. Lars H. Vistines, Md. D., Department of Surgery, Palo Alto Verternas Hospital, Palo Alto, California. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We wish to thank Mr. Jeff Shyshaka, of the Medical Illustration Service, and Mr. Jon Kosek, M.D., of the Laboratory Service For assistance in evaluation them. Both are of the Veterans Administration Hospital, Palo Alto, California. Page 3 (Baxter International #37084). THE HEYER-SCHULTE HOT MEMOS: Baxter International Note: American Hospital Supply Corporation had much earlier purchased Dow Chemical's Bioscience Enterprise, Inc. The Heyer Schulte Corp. was then a subsidiary of the American Hospital Supply Corporation. As Baxter Travenol Labs, Baxter Travenol had previously tested breast implants for Heyer Schulte Corporation. This testing was done BEFORE Baxter Travenol Labs purchased American Hospital Supply Corporation and Heyer Schulte. Later, when Baxter Travenol Labs had purchased American Hospital Supply Corporation AND Heyer Schulte, it then changed its name to become Baxter International. Heyer-Schulte was a medial devices subsidiary company of The American Hospital Supply Corporation. In 1972, it lured several scientists and salesmen from Dow Corning to start their own breast implant business, The McGhan Corp. McGhan of The Dow Corning Corp., led the group. Two years later, in 1974, Don McGhan started his own breast implant company, McGhan Medical Corporation in Santa Barbara, California. The Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. purchased McGhan Medical. Don McGhan then formed another company, Mentor Corp. The FDA is still allowing Don McGhan's second company, The Mentor Corp., to manufacture breast implants. The women now must sign AN INFORMED CONSENT FORM, and the company MUST maintain a patient database. The Heyer-Schulte Hot Memos also reveal the deliberate and massive " corporate cover-up " and also, the " intermarriage corporate connections " of these corporations. Many of the breast implant scientists, engineers, etc., made the implant circuit and worked at each of the manufacturer's plants. They all knew each other. HEYER SCHULTE HOT MEMOS: Document #13: Baxter International - Heyer Schulte Baxter 78608,78609,78610, 78611,78612, 78613,7861478615,7861678617,78618 J. Rudy, Heyer-Schulte Corp. Date: July 14, 1976 From: G. Frugard SUBJECT: TRIP TO DOW CORNING There are both positive and negative aspects to my trip to Dow Corning. On the positive side, I feel that I was successful in bringing back a comprehensive summary (much of it verbatim) of all their animal data, or at least all that I was given access to. The negative aspect is that the data doesn't answer the key questions I presented to Dow concerning migration and the consequences. Also, as you will see, many of these experiments were not well controlled. (He met with Joe Radzius, Dow Corning attorney, and FDA and legal liaison who knows Jim Rudy well and sends his regards.) The format of our meeting will probably be used by Dow Corning with other interested parties, due, for the most part, to Dow's concern over making statements concerning the safety and efficacy of their material, which may be difficult to substantiate (my interpretation) based on conversation. Dow Corning is concerned about the Amendments to the Food and Drug Commission (FDA) and what will be required of them. Top management is apprehensive about the withdrawal of General Electric and Rhone-Poulenc and others from the medical segments of the elastomer market. Whether or not we want to be more specific and emphatic about the possible hazards of uncontained silicone is a decision that will need to be made. A general summary of such complications would include: (1-4 and 5: migration of the silicone, with mild to severe consequences, including reduction of (blanked out)....breast size and absorption of the silicone by the blood and lymph systems, resulting in damage to the liver and kidneys. Epidermal response was focal and consisted of sicharosis, a canthosis and hyperkeratosis. The dermal reaction was situationed beneath the epidermal lesion and consisted of a small focus of fibroblasts and capillary proliferation accompanied by a mononuclear cell inflammatory infiltration. Main reaction of test group: Mononuclear infiltration; foreign body giant cells; almost all minimal or minimal to moderate connective tissue proliferation. Document #14 Baxter International #78611 Biometric Testing, Inc. Biometric Laboratory, New Jersey Rabbit Implant With Histopathology Of Gel Implants: Twenty-one days past implants animals killed. An autopsy was performed on each rabbit. All tissues and organs fixed pending instructions from Dow. (No instructions were sent.) Findings: Histopath exam - of muscle sites revealed mild to acute inflammatory reaction. The reaction (at every site) was characterized by a typical inflammatory cell infiltrate with or without fibroblastic activity. ..... " 14 day - death - rabbit died 4 days past implant: pulmonary congestion, G.I. hemorrhaging and general “atrophy of all major organs. " Reference # A-1544: March 6, 1975 Chief Investigator: Carson, Ph.D. He viewed the Dog Study and copied verbatim: Baxter Id. #78616,78617,78618. See Below: Study: Chronic Implantation Studies of Polysiloxanes in Dogs. Document #15: HRONIC IMPLANTATION STUDIES OF POLYSILOXANES IN DOGS: Laboratory: Food and Drug Research Laboratories Maurice Avenue at 58th Street Maspath, New York Chief Investigator: Carson, Ph.D., Director, Biological Division REFERENCE: Report: Chronic Implantation Studies of Polysiloxanes in Dogs: Covers three-year studies of effects in dogs of implanted plastic materials in both cured and uncured states and in physical forms of solid film, perforated film, sponge amorphous forms and miniature artificial breasts over protracted periods. STUDY DESCRIPTION: Pure bred beagles 5-7 months age. Each sample implanted in four replicates which were excised, one or two at a time at three, nine and twenty-four or thirty-six months. RESULTS: “The site of the intramuscular implant DCX-0885 was surrounded by a lining of granulamatous inflammation tissue in one dog and hyalinized connective tissue reaction of 3+ in another and a fibrous reaction 1+ in a third animal. CONCLUSION: Table #1: Study Results for DCX-3-0885: (a) The conclusion reached in study #1: “perhaps all gels were reactive.” ( Concerning migration: Study #IV indicates that the gel migrates at least into the capsule, " ....multiple small oval spaces containing fragments of clear (nonfibrogenic) test material were often present in the connective tissue capsule that surrounded the main implant site. " Unfortunately, the data collected in this study does not answer questions concerning migration, even though that was the main objective (of the study.) Attachments: Page two of letter to Heyer-Schulte from Dow concerning disclosure, signed by Mac stating that: I complied with their request for copies of my notes. Frugard GF/id Attachments: Page two of letter to Heyer-Schulte from Dow concerning disclosure, signed by Mac stating that: I complied with their request for copies of my notes. Document #16: Interoffice Correspondence Heyer Schulte Corporation Date: October 17, 1975 From: Jim Rudy Sub: Mammaries Account Representatives and Regional Managers: Regional Managers Ray Hanacek East* Rudi Schulte TRADE SECRET MB 184487,184488 Since my arrival at Heyer-Schulte, I have been taught that " soft is good " in discussing mammaries, especially gel-filled mammaries....with these considerations in mind, two weeks ago Dick Polito obtained for us twelve mammaries of McGhan manufacture and a similar quantify of Dow-Coring units. These were delivered along with a similar quantify of Heyer-Schulte mammaries to the people at the Corporate Technology Center in Santa Ana for comparative physical testing. Gel viscosity was compared by placing samples from each manufacturer in a cylindrical container as pictured and measuring the time for a steel ball to fall through the mass. The results indicate a startling difference. Time for the steel ball to fall through gels of each manufacturer were: Heyer-Schulte - 4075 seconds Dow Corning - 3330 seconds McGhan 55 seconds. No wonder McGhan’s (3-M) feels softer. Their gel is virtually not cross-linked. Document #17 Heyer-Schulte: Interoffice Memo Date: October 30, 1975 From: Jim Rudy, President of Heyer Schulte Beverly Siow cc: Joe Utt, Tom Hyans, East Attched is a copy of " Injectable Fluid Silicone Therapy - Human Morbidity and Mortality " by Ellenbogen, M. D.; Rita Ellenbogen, M. D., Leonard Rubin, M. D. This paper describes problems relating to physical migration including liver dysfunction, and foreign body granuloma inn four victims of silicone injection. It is my understanding that similar mononuclear and giant cell reaction results in some patients wherein silicone gel has escaped from the shell. Jim Rudy JR:ja (Note: And the silicone envelope). Document #18 Interoffice Memo TRADE SECRET MB184489 Heyer-Schulte Date: November 20, 1975 From: Jim Rudy, President Sub: More on Mammary Safety vs. Performance We are working on preparation of the gel filled mammary comparisons by an independent lab, which I promised in my letter of October 17, 1975. I am advised that some significant number of customers (plastic surgeons,) don’t particularly doubt the conclusions, but are not impressed with the importance of gel-viscosity or shell strength. I suggest that this is a naive position and one which will be changing in the relatively near future. To illustrate, Heyer-Schulte now has 15 active law suits involving leaking mammary implants. Of these fifteen, nine occurred in 1975 alone. At the ASPRS (American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons) in Toronto, I attended a session and was amazed at the Naivet & eacute; of several plastic surgeons who rose to discuss ruptured implants. They seemed to believe that all gel was either " cohesive " or " non-cohesive " , and that it would be sold in a mammary implant only if it were the former.....I believe these factors are important. I recognize that this type of information must be used carefully, as it is not our policy to sell by knocking competition. .....the hazards which could be associated with use of our products and with which they may not be as familiar as they could be. Jim Rudy - cc: Ray Hanacek, East, Rudi Schulte Document #19 Heyer-Schulte Corporation American Hospital Supply Corporation/(Baxter International Corp.) MB184491 400 Pine Avenue Goleta, California March 29, 1976 Cauley , M.D. 1010 East Third Street Chatanooga, Tennessee 37403 Dear Dr. : This letter is to follow-up and confirm elements of our telephone conversation of March 23. We were concerned with one of your patients who had been augmented with.......until approximately 10 months post-implant. Despite apparently commonly held opinions to the contrary, it is not surprising that migration of the gel occurred........In such cases, it has been our practice to attempt to maintain rapport with such patients by reacting rapidly with a humanistic concern and expressing a willingness to minimize any financial impact that such disappointing results incur. Accordingly, without implying liability on our part; but in an effort to help this patient and maintain good relations with our public, we would be happy to supply replacement implants and if the situation warrants, we could also consider defraying hospital expenses. Please keep us posted on ANY situation which develops with this patient. Sincerely, A. Rudy, President; JR;je Document #20 Baxter International: #79038 Memo: March 5, 1976 Bob: Here are the mammary papers. I've separated them into two piles. The folder with the pink star on the front contains those papers (arranged alphabetically by author) which seem to me most useful for extracting data.....the other pile contains the papers which seemed to me less useful.....papers dealing mainly with matters of surgical technique (which I assume we want to say little---if anything—about.... Betsy. Document #21 WARNINGS BAX 79042-79045 " .....the silicone rubber mammary envelope has a low tear strength....note: gel prostheses may be easily ruptured when still hot from the autoclave....the gel interior of these products is vulcanized to minimize the migration of gel should a rupture occur in the silicone envelope. however, should the silicone envelope be ruptured, Heyer-Schulte cannot guarantee reliable gel containment, and the prosthesis should be replaced. Whether or not we want to be more specific and emphatic about the possible hazards of un-contained silicone is a decision that will need to be made. Most pertinent here are the papers on the complications of silicone injections: " Ellenboggen, Injectable Fluid Silicone Therapy, " " Symmara, Silicone Mastitis in Topless Waitresses. " and most especially the paper by Boo-Cahi on " The Complications of Augmentation Mammaplasty by Silicone Injects, " which discusses the problems resulting from injecting a vulcanized (gel-type) silicone. A general summary of such complications would include: (1). one recorded case of intravascular injection of silicone resulting in death; (2). hypo-pigmentation of the breast; (3). hard, nodular lumps; (4). silicone mastitis; (5). migration of the silicone, with mild to severe consequences, including reduction of (.......whited out) and absorption of the silicone by the blood and lymph systems, resulting in damage to the liver and kidneys; See also Goldwyn, " An Unusual Complication of the Use of the Cronin Implant for Augumentation Mammaplasty, " who reports a case of wound infection. Cronin and Greenbert, " Our experiences with the Silastick Gel Breast Prosthesis, " pg. 4. Guardian, " Complications of Breast Implantations, pg 32; infection is manifested by swelling, tenderness, pain, fever and a positive culture. It may appear in the immediate postoperative period or weeks, months, or even years after insertion of the implant. IN THE ABSENCE OF CLASSIC SYMPTOMS, sub-acute or chronic infections may be DIFFICULT to diagnose. " , " Silastic Breast Implants: Coping with Complications, p. 590, neural complications, etc., have been reported. See also articles by Freeman, Courtiss, Gurdin, , Owsley, McKinney,McDougall,Corso, De Cholnoky, Rubin, Berens, ,Conway, , Synder, , Brauer, Goldwyn, Psillakis, Bing, Brown, Dunsif, Stubenbord, Conway, Schwager, Gutherie, Imber, Lipshutz, Little, Nedelman, Mazzoni, Peacock, Van Winkle, Ross, Ballantyne, etc. " (Published articles by Plastic Surgeons). Notation: Houston physician, Dr. Cronin, was the inventor of the first mammary implant. The next three pages reference articles written by plastic surgeons relating to complications from silicone envelope and silicone gel implants. Papers written by world-wide plastic surgeons as far back as late 1960s and submitted to their journals but never disclosed to the public. The Plastic Surgeons & Reconstructive Society (ASPRS), and the AMA, knew as early as the 1960's of the complications and dangers, but did not advise the public. They kept implanting. They got richer. They and the AMA joined forces with the breast implant manufacturers: i.e. the infamous Mayo Clinic, Harvard Report, and the New England Journal Reports with their financial contributions. Document #22 Veterans Administration Hospital Palo Alto, California 94304 When replying, refer to 640/112 Baxter International #37080 April 29, 1976 Mr. Ken Eckhardt Product Director, Plastic Surgery Heyer-Schulte Corporation P. O. Box 946 Goleta, California 93017 Dear Mr. Eckhardt: Enclosed is a copy of our paper on " Local Tissue Reaction to Ruptured Thin Gel Prostheses. " This paper has been submitted for publication in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.