Guest guest Posted March 19, 2006 Report Share Posted March 19, 2006 From an anonymous sister - scanned but not corrected - possibly from the Catch files. CHEMICAL DECEPTION - Dr. Marc Lappe Chapter Eight - An Overview By the 1930s, no one would dream of intentionally putting raw silica into the human body because silica dust had been shown to cause acute illness and death or a chronic lung-damaging disease known as silicosis when the dust was breathed. When silicon dioxide in the form of crystalline silicon is injected into the body, it stimulates a florid inflammatory response. It is so potent an inflammatory agent that many laboratories use it as a " booster " or adjuvant to provoke the most massive immunologic response possible in test animals. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has since found that silicone breast implants were " intentionally adulterated " with silica that was added as a filler in the envelope to change the properties of the silicone in the eslastomer envelope. In the 1940s, Dow Chemical Company acquired the patent rights and gave them to an independent subsidiary formed between Dow Chemical and the Corning Glass Corporation, the Dow-Corning Corporation of Midland, Michigan. (Corning had the most expertise in the world in dealing with silica, the basic ingredient of glass. Although the original 1966 patent described these implants as being a totally implantable, nonreactive device to be placed within the human body, adequate safety testing or formal trials of the new device were never conducted. That is, neither the degree of nonreactivity nor the adequacy of the containment of the silicone had been established prior to its marketing. In fact, according to Tom Talcott, the scientist who helped design the first envelopes, they were " never designed to hold and retain silicone. " The slow oozing of silicone gel from breast prostheses manufactured in the early 1970s is evident to any person who has held them in his hands; they are greasy to touch. Yet the company has maintained that it could not have known that a " bleed problem " existed in their product until after researchers outside their laboratories tested them. Polmanteer, a Dow Corning's scientist, was granted a mammery prostheses patent: Patent: #4,138,382, dated February, 1979, which states: " In the unlikely event of breakage of container 21 or in the event of seepage of gel 22 through container 21 (e.g. by osmosis), the infinitely swellable gel is observed to be absorbed and dissipated by the body. The dissipation of the hydrophilic gel by the body represents an improvement over previously known hydrophobic gels. " Polmanteer's patent also states: The funnel is about half filled with alumina (obtained from Alcoa)....is then added along with 0.04g. of Vazo 64 r (an azobis(isobutyronitrile) free radical catalyst to initiate polymerization, available from DuPont.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.