Guest guest Posted August 25, 1999 Report Share Posted August 25, 1999 This is a mind-bogglingly detailed post by Ron Sebol of the low-carbing diabetics' group. You really have to appreciate the attention these number-crunching " diabetes nerds " put into these calculations! We all can benefit from their incredible dedication! Susie ******************* (note: GI...glycemic index) My earlier postings said take the carb grams and multiply by the GI and that was wrong. That will not produce a correct glucose equivalent. I would like to thank those of you who noticed that earlier error. Though I would like to thank you, unfortunately I can't because nobody noticed. Tch tch gang. Unfortunately, the process is more involved than I had indicated. My error was the result of my forgetting to address how GI table entry portions were determined. Specifically, that GI test portion sizes were such that there was a net 50 gram carb yield of each item tested to produce the GI list. About a year earlier I posted a correct version and somehow forgot in the nonce. A few times recently I have talked about working up an insulin dose with a self calibration derived from pure glucose (using the glucose tablets) and I have alluded to (or given wrong instructions concerning) calculations that convert food portions in a meal to their respective equivalants in pure glucose. That is a meaningful calculation because the glucose equivalent for a mixed meal is the sum of the glucose equivalents of each item in the meal. It is not necessary to do a unique mixed meal experiment for every conceivable different mix of menu items because the cumulative effect of the menu is the sum of the effects of the menu items and the interractions are negligable as long as huge amounts of fat or fiber are not thrown in. There are formal published studies showing that it is legitimate to simply add contributions in this manner. The precision of glucose tabs is the justification for using them to set up our insulin self calibration and, thereafter, we only need to express a meal as being equivalent to some amount of glucose to know how to do a sliding scale dose with exquisiste accuracy. Below, I will go through the steps required to scope out a food item we wish to add to our quick reference 3 X 5 cards (or spread sheet or whatever). Using a piece of white bread as an example of the calculation process, here is how the numbers work. To be able to follow the logic, you will need to remember that the tested portions of all the items on the GI were sized to contain a net 50 grams of carbohydrate. For additional GI lore, Rick's site is recommended. See http://www.diabetesdigest.com/april_glycemic_intro.htm Looking in a food data base, such as http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/cgi-bin/nut_search.pl we learn that one slice of commercially prepared white bread, having a gross weight of 25 grams, has a carb content of 12.375 grams. Since the GI test portions must each NET 50 grams of carb (by definition of how GI was measured), and since the net carb fraction of bread is 12.375/25 = .495 (the net carb grams divided by the gross portion weight) then there were 101 GROSS weight grams of bread required to produce that 50 net grams of carb. That last number of 101 comes from 50/.495 = 101. The result is checked noting .495 X 101 = 50 We also know from Rick Mendosa's GI list at http://www.mendosa.com/gilists.htm that the GI of bread is 101 and that the GI of pure glucose is 137. Putting that together we conclude that it would take a gross weight of 1.37 X 101 = 138.4 gross weight grams of bread to do the same thing to BG as 50 gross weight grams of glucose. Of course the gross weight portion of glucose in the GI table was also 50 grams, the same as its net weight, because it is 100% glucose. One useful bread number, therefore, is 50/138.4 = .36127 gm glucose equivalent per each gross gram of bread. We would round that to .36 Therefore, one 25 gram slice of bread, with its 12.375 grams of carb, had a glucose equivalent of 25 X .36 = 9 gms of glucose. After doing such a calculation for bread, what we would retain is that there are .36 gms equiv glucose in each gross gram of bread. Or we could say, noting that 9.124/12.375= 73%, that if we know the net carb grams in our sliding scale bread portion then 73% of the net carb grams is the glucose equivalent grams of that portion. In general, using the net 50 carb gram definition constraint on GI entries and the net carb grams per gross gram of item from a food data base, find the gross portion weight that went into the GI table item. Multiply that gross portion weight by 137 and then divide by the GI of the item. That will be the gross portion weight that would yield the same BG result as 50gms of glucose. Once that is known, a realistic portion can be extracted by a simple proportional scaling up or down from the GI portion. If you calibrate using goucose tabs, also consider each cooked ounce of meat as yielding the equivalent of 4.2 gm of glucose. That comes from 7 gms protein per oz meat (for most meats) and from the fact that 60% of meat protein converts to glucose. The 4.2 is 60% of 7. In milk proteins, the conversion is slightly under 50%. I apologize for the oversimplifications of the earlier postings. This is much more likely to be right. I hope I am not asked to boil this down more. This distillation is as boiled as I know how to render it. As to why bother? Thisnumber crunching is THE most precise way of determining an insulin dose. It is the which, than which, there is no whicher. Regretably, many ordinary items are not seen in the GI tables. I suggest that using the nearest similar item will be close enough. That will still be far far better than the 200% dosing errors one can end up with if cozened to except the inexact ADA food exchange tables. Of course we only need to plod through the entire process shown above once per food item of interest. Thereafter we would get the salient info from a 3 X 5 card with our favorite foods listed along with their glucose equiv. per gross gram or per carb gram or both. We might even want to do it on the basis of cups (food volume) rather than weight. The calculations would be very similar to those shown. Please give me some feedback on this posting. What I am interested in is how many of you understood the process of calculation described above. If you understood, would you bother to use this method or is it too much trouble to set up the system? Ron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.