Guest guest Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 Colleagues, the following is FYI and does not necessarily reflect my own opinion. I have no further knowledge of the topic. If you do not wish to receive these posts, set your email filter to filter out any messages coming from @nutritionucanlivewith.com and the program will remove anything coming from me. --------------------------------------------------------- FDA Urges Prominent Warning Label For Antibiotic http://www.therapeuticsdaily.com/news/article.cfm?contentvalue=916378 & contenttyp\ e=sentryarticle & %20channelID=31 Dow - May. 19, 2006 (From THE WALL STREET JOURNAL) By Wilde Mathews FOOD AND DRUG Administration safety reviewers have linked the antibiotic Ketek to 12 cases of liver failure, including four deaths, and they are recommending adding a prominent new label warning that " severe, life-threatening, and in some cases fatal " liver toxicity has been reported in patients taking the drug. The findings, in a confidential May 16 memorandum by the FDA's Division of Drug Risk Evaluation reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, raise new questions about the Sanofi-Aventis SA antibiotic. They also put more pressure on the FDA as Congress carries out investigations of the agency's handling of Ketek. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Grassley, an Iowa Republican, and House Democrats Markey of Massachusetts and Henry Waxman of California want to know more about a large clinical trial that was designed to demonstrate the drug's safety but was dogged by fraud and other problems. The FDA ended up discounting the study but approved Ketek anyway in April 2004. The lawmakers are also examining ongoing clinical trials of Ketek in children. Last year, Ketek was prescribed 3.35 million times in the U.S. and had sales of $193 million, according to IMS Health. A strong label warning would probably depress sales of the drug, but the agency doesn't always follow recommendations from its drug-safety office. In a statement, an FDA spokeswoman said that the memo reflects the drug-safety office's " interpretation of adverse-event data " and recommends " labeling revisions be considered but not product withdrawal. " Calling some of the liver-failure cases " clinically remarkable, " the memo describes " profound " liver injury that set in as soon as a few days after some patients took Ketek and had a " signature of rapid onset and tempo. " The document says that many of the 12 cases appeared to have few other possible causes and occurred in people who were " generally healthy. " Besides the four deaths, one patient had a liver transplant and three others were considered for transplants but recovered. In a statement, Sanofi-Aventis said it " continues to believe that Ketek is safe and effective when used as directed. " It said that it is engaged in " ongoing discussions with the FDA regarding a detailed medical evaluation of hepatic events " reported in connection with Ketek use and that it is evaluating the data with leading experts. The company said a detailed response to the findings in the memo would be inappropriate while it is in discussions with the agency. The internal FDA memo analyzes incidents reported through the end of April in people in the U.S. who were prescribed Ketek after the drug won FDA approval. The reviewers found 23 reported cases of serious liver injury, as well as the 12 liver failures, that were " associated " with Ketek. The FDA also got reports of 44 liver-related events that weren't serious. The overall estimated rate of reported liver failures tied to Ketek, known generically as telithromycin, was 23 per 10 million prescriptions. That compares with a reported rate of 6.6 per 10 million prescriptions for Avelox, six for Tequin and 2.1 for Levaquin. For two antibiotics in a class similar to Ketek -- Biaxin and Zithromax -- the rates were 4.2 and 3.7. Use of an older antibiotic, Trovan, was sharply restricted in 1999 after the FDA received reports of 14 liver failures, which translates into an estimated reporting rate of 58 per 10 million prescriptions. The rates include any generic versions of the drugs. The memo cautioned that such comparisons aren't definitive, because they may at least partly reflect differences in how likely health-care providers and others were to report events. The rates were also calculated based on different time frames. The memo says the rate of liver-event filings about Ketek rose after the January publication online of a medical-journal article on liver damage in people who took the drug. By some estimates, the FDA gets reports of only 10% or less of potential drug side-effects. Despite the system's flaws, such reports have been a major factor in the withdrawal of several drugs. The FDA spokeswoman said that the safety reviewers found " the numerical risk appears higher in the Ketek database " but " they are not able to conclude greater risk for liver injury in patients receiving Ketek than other drugs in the category. " The finding will be " carefully considered along with all other sources of expert review " in the FDA's final assessment of Ketek, she said. Calculated a different way, the rate of reported liver failures in people who took Ketek was 167 per one million person-years of use of the drug (a person-year is a year of one patient taking the drug), the FDA document says. Even before the medical-journal article stimulated more reports, the rate was 89, the memo says, well above the liver-failure rate for the general population, which is about one per one million person-years. The document concludes that the Ketek rates are " consistent with an association " between the drug and liver failure. The memo says it is from an FDA safety evaluator named Wassel and a team leader, Brinker. Mark Avigan, director of the drug-risk-evaluation division, signed off on the memo as well. The document is addressed to Janice Soreth, the head of the FDA division that approves antibiotics, which is likely to spearhead any negotiations the agency has with Sanofi-Aventis about adding warnings to the label. The congressional investigations are focusing on a large clinical safety trial of more than 24,000 people. The study -- whose problems were detailed in the Journal May 1 -- was conducted by the drug maker after the FDA initially refused to approve the medication because of lingering concerns about liver damage and other potential risks. Despite the worries about the safety study, the FDA approved Ketek to treat sinusitis, bronchitis and pneumonia acquired outside a hospital. FDA officials wrote at the time that there was a " systemic failure " of the safety study's monitoring program to " detect data integrity problems when they clearly existed. " But they wrote that they were " able to rely on the post-marketing experience " outside the U.S., where there was a low rate of side-effect reports tied to Ketek, " to conclude there was substantial evidence of safety. " After 3.7 million overseas prescriptions, there had been one death related to a liver reaction, and it wasn't clearly linked to Ketek. But according to the new drug-safety reviewers' memorandum, the number of U.S. reports of liver failures among Ketek users is far higher than those the agency has received from overseas. The memo cites just two reports of possible liver failure in other countries, both from Japan, even though the drug was approved in Europe in 2001. The reason for the discrepancy isn't clear. Currently, Ketek's label carries a mildly worded caution that liver dysfunction " has been reported with the use of Ketek " and that " these events were generally reversible. " When the medical-journal report came out, the FDA urged doctors to watch for signs of liver damage. But the agency said that based on the information it had when it approved Ketek, including the large safety study, the liver risk tied to the drug appeared similar to that of other antibiotics. The drug-safety memo recommended that the Ketek label carry a warning about liver risk set apart by bold type or a black box, which is reserved for the most serious safety concerns. Among other things, the proposed warning would mention reports of liver necrosis and liver failure, and say that in some cases liver injury " progressed rapidly and occurred after administration of a few doses of Ketek. " The suggested labeling would also warn doctors to watch patients for signs of hepatitis. (END) Dow Newswires May 19, 2006 04:00 ET (08:00 GMT) -- ne Holden, MS, RD < fivestar@... > " Ask the Parkinson Dietitian " http://www.parkinson.org/ " Eat well, stay well with Parkinson's disease " " Parkinson's disease: Guidelines for Medical Nutrition Therapy " http://www.nutritionucanlivewith.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.