Guest guest Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 Chief: Fire at mold house may be accidental By LISA REDMOND, Sun Staff Article Last Updated: 01/19/2007 11:35:24 AM EST http://www.lowellsun.com/local/ci_5045117 PEPPERELL -- The state fire marshal's office has joined the investigation into a fire Wednesday night that destroyed a Pepperell home that made headlines for its mold contamination, but a local fire official said the blaze does not appear suspicious. " It doesn't look intentional, " Pepperell Fire Chief Bozicas said yesterday. It appears someone was using a blow torch to do some work on pipes inside the vacant house, and wood may have been ignited, Bozicas said. Whether the work was legal and with permits is unclear. Bozicas said it's standard procedure to ask the fire marshal's office to investigate. The home was not inhabited and had no electricity or gas that might have sparked the fire. and her husband, Rick, moved from the house at 20 ee Road in 2003 because the mold infestation made them sick. They took a huge loss on the house, for which they paid $227,900, when they let the bank have it back for $1. The house, which is a total loss due to the fire, is currently owned by Inner City Development of 114 University Ave., Lowell, Bozicas said. The house is assessed at $97,000, and the land is valued at more than $100,000, he said. , who now lives in an apartment with her husband near their former home, said she saw the flames coming from the vacant house about 6:35 p.m. The fire gutted the home. She said she cried as she watched the house burn. Although she no longer has a financial connection to the home, her fear was that someone would come in, do some cosmetic changes and then try to resell it without dealing with the mold issue. " In some ways, it's a godsend that it burned, " she said. " A least now I'm not worried about another family living there. " is suing Louise Knight and RE/MAX Colonial of Groton, whom she says should have known about the mold before selling her the home in 2002. That case was recently transferred from Middlesex Superior Court to Northeast Division of Housing Court in Lawrence. Although a housing-court judge ruled against her, said she will appeal to the state Appeals Court. Tell us what you think on this story. Comments | Trackback Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 3 words- back pocket people burning is cheaper than tearing down, and tearing down might make it look like it indeed is toxic and unlivable. exspecially if you can't insure it because it's public knowledge that it's toxic. what's left but accidential burning. --- In , " tigerpaw2c " <tigerpaw2c@...> wrote: > > Chief: Fire at mold house may be accidental > By LISA REDMOND, Sun Staff > Article Last Updated: 01/19/2007 11:35:24 AM EST > > http://www.lowellsun.com/local/ci_5045117 > > > PEPPERELL -- The state fire marshal's office has joined the > investigation into a fire Wednesday night that destroyed a Pepperell > home that made headlines for its mold contamination, but a local > fire official said the blaze does not appear suspicious. > > " It doesn't look intentional, " Pepperell Fire Chief Bozicas > said yesterday. > > It appears someone was using a blow torch to do some work on pipes > inside the vacant house, and wood may have been ignited, Bozicas > said. Whether the work was legal and with permits is unclear. > > Bozicas said it's standard procedure to ask the fire marshal's > office to investigate. The home was not inhabited and had no > electricity or gas that might have sparked the fire. > > and her husband, Rick, moved from the house at 20 > ee Road in 2003 because the mold infestation made them sick. > They took a huge loss on the house, for which they paid $227,900, > when they let the bank have it back for $1. > > The house, which is a total loss due to the fire, is currently owned > by Inner City Development of 114 University Ave., Lowell, Bozicas > said. The house is assessed at $97,000, and the land is valued at > more than $100,000, he said. > , who now lives in an apartment with her husband near their > former home, said she saw the flames coming from the vacant house > about 6:35 p.m. The fire gutted the home. > > She said she cried as she watched the house burn. > > Although she no longer has a financial connection to the home, her > fear was that someone would come in, do some cosmetic changes and > then try to resell it without dealing with the mold issue. > > " In some ways, it's a godsend that it burned, " she said. " A least > now I'm not worried about another family living there. " > > is suing Louise Knight and RE/MAX Colonial of Groton, whom she > says should have known about the mold before selling her the home in > 2002. That case was recently transferred from Middlesex Superior > Court to Northeast Division of Housing Court in Lawrence. > > Although a housing-court judge ruled against her, said she > will appeal to the state Appeals Court. > > > > Tell us what you think on this story. > > Comments | Trackback > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.