Guest guest Posted December 27, 2006 Report Share Posted December 27, 2006 December 26, 2006 Section: NEWS Edition: Final Page: A1, A7 EU law has Del. companies watching LULADEY B. TADESSE Staff By LULADEY B. TADESSE The News Journal Aggressive new legislation by the European Union aimed at protecting human health and the environment is expected to create significant financial and bureaucratic burdens on Delaware's $1.9 billion chemical industry. The EU law, called REACH, or Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals, is expected to take effect in June and get phased in during the next 11 years. It is more stringent and comprehensive than U.S. laws governing the chemical industry that haven't changed in 30 years. Under the new EU law, each manufacturer or company that uses chemicals in Europe will have to register nearly each chemical it uses and, depending on volume, test it for safety. Companies also may have to figure out a way to phase out or find alternatives for certain chemicals that are considered highly dangerous to humans and animals. The EU estimates health benefits resulting from REACH will reduce health care spending by 50 billion euros, or $65.6 billion, in the next 30 years. Delaware's manufacturers in Europe -- ranging from DuPont Co., the world's third-largest chemical maker; specialty paper maker Hercules; and W.L. Gore & Associates, which makes fibers, electronics and medical equipment -- will be forced to adopt the new law if they want to take advantage of the world's second-wealthiest consumer market. " Whether we support it or not, we are living with it, " said Fisher, vice president and chief sustainability officer at DuPont in Washington. " It's going to require a lot of work for the chemical companies, and it's going to require a lot of work for the European regulators. " EU economic impact studies in 2003 estimate the cost of the regulations on manufacturers and users of chemicals will cost up to 5.2 billion euros, or $6.8 billion, for the next 15 years. But there remains a lot of uncertainty by companies about the full cost of REACH because a lot of the fees have not yet been determined and rules still are being ironed out. " We are concerned that there is going to be a poor understanding of that list, and the market may actually force some manufacturers out of the business or some chemicals to be withdrawn from the market, " said Walls, managing director for the American Chemistry Council, which opposes the EU law along with the Bush administration. Some consumer and environmental advocates see REACH as the beginning of a new era in global environmental regulations that will hold the industry accountable for the risks posed by its products. The EU also sees itself as creating a new gold standard that others, including the United States, should emulate. " It's a step in the right direction, " said Rick Hind, legislative director at Greenpeace Toxics Campaign in Washington. But Hind and other environmental advocates following the legislation closely find REACH not tough enough, claiming it provides " loopholes " for chemical companies. For example, companies that make certain chemicals at volumes less than 10 tons don't have to register them as quickly and they are not automatically expected to provide safety testing. It is not surprising for some that years of negotiation with the industry have loosened some of the original REACH regulations. " They are not interested in shutting down their own industry, " said Daryl W. Ditz, senior policy adviser in the chemicals program for the Center for International Environmental Law in Washington. " I see REACH slowly reorienting the chemical industry, not crushing it. " Shift in the burden Companies like DuPont that make a wide variety of products, from hybrid corn seeds to automobile paint to Teflon pots and pans, are used to facing tough regulations on agriculture and biotechnology, but not chemicals. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Toxic Substances Control Act -- the counterpart of REACH in this country -- lacks the authority to restrict or ban chemicals made before 1976. Unless the chemicals already are known or suspected to be harmful to humans and/or the environment, the government does not require companies to provide data or testing on those chemicals. This is a concern to some environmentalists because a large portion of the chemicals in use today are those made before the EPA law was passed in 1976. " We are definitely behind if you compare us with directives coming from Europe, " said Nabil Nasr, director of the Center for Integrated Manufacturing Studies at Rochester Institute of Technology. " We tend to focus on targeted areas of known risks. They are seeking a lot of restrictions to ensure the process is benign and ensure the safety of the process. " The EU's goal is to try and uncover chemicals and products that may be harmful to people but have not yet been identified. Until recently, its environmental regulations collected comprehensive data only on chemicals introduced after 1981. Because recent findings show 70 percent of the new substances tested in Europe after 1981 are dangerous, EU lawmakers decided to broaden the scope of REACH to include information and safety data on all chemicals. To speed up the process and beef up its regulations, the EU has shifted the burden of collecting data and conducting testing on the chemical industry and its customers. There are an estimated 30,000 or more chemicals that will need to be registered. Of those, about 1,500 chemicals are considered highly toxic and are linked to cancer, birth defects and other illnesses. Those chemicals will need authorization. Cost of REACH unknown For DuPont, which has 37 manufacturing plants in Europe and produces or buys " several hundred " chemicals on a regular basis, REACH will have a significant impact. " We will pay a fee we don't currently pay today, " Fisher said. Because DuPont has a large network of suppliers and customers, it will also have to figure out the answers to a whole slew of questions, including who is going to register the chemicals, who will pay for it and how the safety testing will be conducted. " It is still not well known what will be the actual cost for carrying out these registration requirements, " said Jim Searles, partner at Steptoe & , an American law firm based in Brussels, Belgium. It represents clients who are in all ends of the chemical supply chain ranging from raw material manufacturers to chemical purchasers. There are a variety of estimates of how much it will cost a company to comply with the registration process, ranging from 30,000 euros, or about $39,400, to 100,000 euros, or about $131,000 per chemical, Searles said. The final impact on companies' products is still unknown. For example, the jury is still out whether REACH will force DuPont to make changes to its controversial Teflon products, which use perfluorooctanoic acid, or PFOA, a chemical that under intense federal scrutiny in the United States because of concerns the chemical resists breakdown, accumulates in the environment and in human tissue, and can potentially cause cancer and other illnesses. The EPA recently recommended listing the chemical as a likely carcinogen. DuPont officials said they plan to register PFOA with the EU but don't expect to have to go through the hurdle of authorization, which would entail conducting new tests and developing a substitution plan. They expect the EU will take into account the company's work with the EPA to phase out the chemical from its manufacturing process and products. The company said it has reduced the amount of global emissions of PFOA by 95 percent from its facilities and products. " These efforts will go a long way to address any actions taken by the EU on PFOA under REACH, " said Rick Straitman, spokesman for DuPont. For companies like Gore and Hercules, which purchase most of their chemicals from suppliers, the change in law could be unsettling if certain products are removed from the market. " We don't have enough information at this time -- nor do an awful lot of people -- to know if any of the provisions will affect our product lines, " said Ed Schneider, spokesman for Gore. But Schneider said he expects the company's research-and-development team, along with its procurement staff, to be working hard to cope with possible changes in the sourcing of the essential chemicals used in their products. Hercules, which has 11 plants in Europe, also is trying to figure out how it will be impacted. " It could affect us from the standpoint of availability and it could affect the price of it and all this could affect the cost, " said Riley, Hercules spokesman. While the chemical industry is not thrilled about increased regulations, some see REACH as an opportunity to develop greener products. " REACH will pose some opportunities for DuPont and maybe others like us, " said DuPont's Fisher. " Part of their principle or intent of their legislation is to provide or force the market to bring greener substances to the market place. That plays very well to our strengths around science and innovation. " Greener products In October, DuPont unveiled plans to double its spending on research and development of eco-friendlier products and services in the next decade by introducing at least 1,000 environmentally safer alternatives such as synthetic fibers with biological components, instead of petrochemical components, and lower-toxin automotive finishes. Some large retailers, including Wal-Mart and Dell, have begun taking a look at the sourcing of their products to find out if they are made using environmentally friendly processes. " These are companies who are saying, 'We are going to be picky about what chemicals we choose,' and REACH is going to make their life a little easier, " said Ditz of the Center for International Environmental Law. " Some chemical companies are not happy about this, but the net effect is safer and cleaner chemicals in the marketplace and more knowledge about chemicals and how they behave. " Contact Luladey B. Tadesse at 324-2789 or ltadesse@.... THE NEW RULES A new European Union law requires each manufacturer or company that uses chemicals in Europe to register nearly every chemical it uses and, depending on volume, test it for safety. Companies also may have to figure out a way to phase out or find alternatives for certain chemicals that are considered highly dangerous to humans and animals. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Copyright © The News Journal. All rights reserved. Reproduced with the permission of Gannett Co., Inc. by NewsBank, inc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.