Guest guest Posted January 30, 2007 Report Share Posted January 30, 2007 Guess the topic change didn't take place. The topic was negative ion. Yes, it was very interesting to me. There is a difference between the two. They are not the same from any study I have read. Every study I have read show how beneficial they are. But, I am still looking for a negative one. hehehe And I have read tons of them. They do mention as both Carl and myself mention that you need to make sure the ionizer is a negative ionizer and does not produce ozone. I think we all agree that ozone is not healthy if breathed in. At no time did either of us condone having one in your home or breathing it in. So guess we all agree on that one. [iequality] Ionizing air cleaners Does anyone know of research into effects of ion generating air cleaning devices on respiratory health / asthma? ---------------------------------------------------------- " Jim H. White " <systemsa@...> fourbrownpaws Re: [iequality] Ionizing air cleaners Smogwatcher Almost all of these are just ozone machines renamed. ozone kills lung tissue and makes asthma worse. Why are you considering one of these nefarious machine? See the California publications on ozone machines in occupied dwellings. In Canada, Health Canada also strongly recommends against them. The US EPA is against them, but not quite as vehemently. Jim H. White System Science Consulting ================================================ > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.