Guest guest Posted February 9, 2007 Report Share Posted February 9, 2007 Bravo Sharon! I hope that they print your letter.. All other considerations aside, I think the language used in the Hardin, Kelman and Saxon rebuttal letter shows that they know they are on shaky ground, scientifically.. At least it raises a lot of red flags for me.. And they seem to be avoiding any real substantiative debate on the inhalational toxicity issues, which are many, but discussion is conspicuously absent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.