Re: [Flood Relief Aid List] ACOEM Statement onAdverseHumanHealth Effects Asso...

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/2007 11:49:42 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, SNK 1955

writes:

Dear All,

I have just returned from Washington where I met with several offices of

Senators, Congressmen and non-profit organizations who advocate for citizen,

worker and health rights regarding the mold issue. I am tired. Yet I witness

the injustice that the misinformation promoted by ACOEM has caused to the lives

of many. Not just those who have been made sick, but the doctors who need to

treat patients, the CIH's who evaluated buildings, the remediators who try

to do their best job. We are all trying to do what is right by the sick and

the property owners. But we can't because of the misinformation promoted by

ACOEM.

I see unnecessary tragedy to the lives of many. I won't/can't stop until

this is corrected. The ACOEM paper was a defense argument right from it's

inception meant to limit financial liability for stakeholders of water damaged

buildings. This is not even a matter of any debate. In all the various

writings/emails on the subject, no one refutes this.

In 2002, there was much fear over the mold issue, from both the health and

the financial aspect. There was much confusion.

This is now 2007, five year later. Much more is understood of the physical

impacts of mold exposure. Much more is understood of what causes mold in

buildings and how to correct it.

Dr. Guidotti, as a man of medicine and president of an organization that

writes national protocol, will you, as so many have indicated is gravely

needed, agree to revisit this legitimacy of ACOEM's position on mold induced

illnesses in relation to indoor water damaged exposure?

We need you.

Sharon Kramer