Guest guest Posted February 4, 2007 Report Share Posted February 4, 2007 Sharon, Once again with much gratitude and appreciation for all that you are doing and all that you are accomplishing. I hope the other issues brought before congress during your stay did not overshadow the message that you carried for all of us, to our legislators. I agree we need to work hard to overcome the problems created by the ACOEM paper. Yes, physicians need to understand the harm that can result in connection with indoor exposure to mycotoxins. Physicians must become educated to the recognition of mold induced illness and the means to effectively address this issue with their patients. As we are fully aware, many patients with mold exposure have suffered needlessly and often remain sick with increasing acuity of symptoms and or permanent complications. Early diagnosis is the key here, no different from many other medical syndromes. However, what is different is that those ill from mycotoxin exposure are desperately seeking help from physicians, and are often not receiving this help. Some patients are fortunate with timely intervention to have full recovery. Unfortunately by the time most patients make it to a physician that has the education and training to assist them, much damage has already occurred. Early diagnosis is critical. It would be very impressive and hopeful if Dr.Guidotti began to work with us on this issue. Sharon, I join you in asking for help from Dr. Guidotti. Neither side wants to see mold cases end up in court. Neither side wants to see the increasing costs to insurance with these types of cases, which we all pay for down the line. The end result of what the ACOEM has worked to accomplish can actively be achieved through a more positive means in a way that could benefit both sides. However, this would require a meeting of the minds.... Until this happens insurance costs will continue to skyrocket in this area and our courtrooms will be filling with more and more toxic tort cases for mold. It is my hope that Dr. Guidotti is willing to work together to see what can be done to prevent this from happening and at the same time keep people healthy. Let this be the common goal to work towards. There are other circumstances as well in this mold issue that contribute to the increasing lawsuits and insurance costs. This problem extends out to hygienists and to restoration/remediation companies that have no accountability. There must be accountability (other than through litigation alone) for any truly effective change to take place. It remains my belief that the only means to accomplish this is through the use of a disciplinary system. This is something that very few within this area of the industry want to see happen and so far the AIHA and other related organizations are not willing to see that this type of enforcement procedure be implemented. Instead, AIHA is determined that in 5 years a code of ethics be put into place that " is enforceable " wihout instituting a disciplinary system. This is too little, too late. It is to the credit of those who work in this field that recognize the need for the establishment of a disciplinary system and have made that known. When dealing with environmental issues that so directly and immediately affect the health and safety of people, there is absolutely no excuse for not having this type of enforcement system in place. And so it is my belief that the lack of such a system has only increased the amount of lawsuits in this area and added greatly to rising insurance costs. Without a disciplinary system in place and the means to enforce this, then government intervention becomes necessary for regulation to occur. Until this happens the numbers of lawsuits will continue to climb. Many of the issues occurring within this industry are closely intertwined and dependent upon one another for resolution to take place. Reduction of both personal injury and property damage go hand in hand. Sharon, the efforts of yourself as well as others that do include members of this industry and all advocates and activists alike are responsible for forcing this industry into looking to the problems and possible solutions. I am in agreement that there is movement in a positive direction. And yes as you have said, there is much work that needs to be done. I would be happy to work with you on MD awareness. Bobbins, RN, L.Ac, QME In a message dated 2/3/2007 7:08:37 AM Central Standard Time, snk1955@... writes: In a message dated 2/2/2007 11:49:42 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, SNK 1955 writes: Dear All, I have just returned from Washington where I met with several offices of Senators, Congressmen and non-profit organizations who advocate for citizen, worker and health rights regarding the mold issue. I am tired. Yet I witness the injustice that the misinformation promoted by ACOEM has caused to the lives of many. Not just those who have been made sick, but the doctors who need to treat patients, the CIH's who evaluated buildings, the remediators who try to do their best job. We are all trying to do what is right by the sick and the property owners. But we can't because of the misinformation promoted by ACOEM. I see unnecessary tragedy to the lives of many. I won't/can't stop until this is corrected. The ACOEM paper was a defense argument right from it's inception meant to limit financial liability for stakeholders of water damaged buildings. This is not even a matter of any debate. In all the various writings/emails on the subject, no one refutes this. In 2002, there was much fear over the mold issue, from both the health and the financial aspect. There was much confusion. This is now 2007, five year later. Much more is understood of the physical impacts of mold exposure. Much more is understood of what causes mold in buildings and how to correct it. Dr. Guidotti, as a man of medicine and president of an organization that writes national protocol, will you, as so many have indicated is gravely needed, agree to revisit this legitimacy of ACOEM's position on mold induced illnesses in relation to indoor water damaged exposure? We need you. Sharon Kramer [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2007 Report Share Posted February 6, 2007 , I am not holding my breath for this one. " It would be very impressive and hopeful if Dr.Guidotti began to work with us on this issue. " It would be the logical thing to do, but.....I doubt they will do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2007 Report Share Posted February 7, 2007 There are certain kinds of people and organizations who refuse to ever admit that they are wrong nomatter how obvious it is because they don't want to be seen as 'weak'. The typically maintain power by fear or intimidation. Its a good recipe for disaster... the worst disasters in human history started out with scenarios like this... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.