Could doctrine of fraudulent concealment mean we all have more time to sue?

[Guest guest]

See this legal opinion:

http://www.lawyersusaonline.com/subscriber/archives.cfm?page=USA/07/2120717.htm

It mentions a doctrine of " fraudulent concealment " that would seem to

me to apply to ALL MOLD ILLNESS CASES.. preventing the statute of

limitations from STARTING to run until the plaintiffs COULD ACTUALLY

SUE AND WIN because of the fraudulent concealment of important

evidence by the ACOEM, CDC, et al...

Basically, they should not be rewarded for setting up a corrupt system

to frustrate justice...and by barring cases before people have had

their chance to sue or by blocking evidence from being considered THEY

ARE...

Okay, now I really have to stop posting and give up this blogging stuff...

[Guest guest]

I am not sure what this means but I have often thought since this

entire mold and chemical situation is full of fraud that we should

have the right to get compensation especially from those people that

are writing for government agencies and giving the wrong information.

In , LiveSimply <quackadillian@...>

wrote:

>

> See this legal opinion:

>

> http://www.lawyersusaonline.com/subscriber/archives.cfm?

page=USA/07/2120717.htm

>

> It mentions a doctrine of " fraudulent concealment " that would seem

to

> me to apply to ALL MOLD ILLNESS CASES.. preventing the statute of

> limitations from STARTING to run until the plaintiffs COULD ACTUALLY

> SUE AND WIN because of the fraudulent concealment of important

> evidence by the ACOEM, CDC, et al...

>

> Basically, they should not be rewarded for setting up a corrupt

system

> to frustrate justice...and by barring cases before people have had

> their chance to sue or by blocking evidence from being considered

THEY

> ARE...

>

>

> Okay, now I really have to stop posting and give up this blogging

stuff...

>

[Guest guest]

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:39:06 -0500, you wrote:

>See this legal opinion:

>

>http://www.lawyersusaonline.com/subscriber/archives.cfm?page=USA/07/2120717.htm

>

>It mentions a doctrine of " fraudulent concealment " that would seem to

>me to apply to ALL MOLD ILLNESS CASES.. preventing the statute of

>limitations from STARTING to run until the plaintiffs COULD ACTUALLY

>SUE AND WIN because of the fraudulent concealment of important

>evidence by the ACOEM, CDC, et al...

>

>Basically, they should not be rewarded for setting up a corrupt system

>to frustrate justice...and by barring cases before people have had

>their chance to sue or by blocking evidence from being considered THEY

>ARE...

>

>

>Okay, now I really have to stop posting and give up this blogging stuff...

Why not just transfer culpability to the enabler's mentioned above?

Without their actions, and/or lack there of, this tragedy couldn't

have happened in the first place.

That is of course if it's about justice and not just about the money.

Besides, their pockets are much deeper anyway's.