Guest guest Posted March 6, 2007 Report Share Posted March 6, 2007 Source: University of British Columbia Date: March 5, 2007 More on: Kidney Disease, Diseases and Conditions, Today's Healthcare, Pharmacology, Urology, Fungus http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070305141208.htm Researcher Finds New Way To Treat Devastating Fungal Infections Science Daily — Devastating blood-borne fungal infections that can be lethal for HIV/AIDS, cancer, and organ transplant patients may be treated more successfully, thanks to a new drug delivery method developed by researchers at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. Pharmaceutical Sciences Prof. Kishor M. Wasan has created a liquid preparation that incorporates drug molecules in fat (lipid-based formulation) so that Amphotericin B, a potent anti-fungal agent, can be taken by mouth with minimal side effects. The agent, used for about 50 years, is currently administered intravenously and has significant toxic side effects, notably severe kidney toxicity as well as serious tissue damage at the intravenous injection site. Wasan and his research team have discovered that the oral preparation triggers a different molecular interaction than intravenous delivery. The lipid-based system attacks fungal cells only while inhibiting the drug's interaction with kidney cells -- boosting effectiveness and dramatically reducing toxicity. The research findings will be presented today at a meeting sponsored by the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists in Washington, D.C. Findings will be published in July 2007 in Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. Because the oral form of the drug is easier to administer and cheaper than intravenous delivery, Wasan predicts that more patients -- especially those in underserved areas and developing countries -- would have access to the medicine. He notes that Amphotericin B is also used to treat Leishmaniasis, a parasitic disease that affects an estimated two million people worldwide according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP) in the U.S. " This research was triggered by clinicians needing a way to kill these fungal infections without risking the patient's kidney, " says Wasan, who is a Distinguished University Scholar and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Chair in Drug Development. " Despite antifungal agents, treating these infections is difficult and challenges researchers to find better outcomes for the patient. " Wasan tested the drug delivery method, in animal models, against two fungal infections seen in their most severe forms in people with suppressed immune systems, such as surgical patients and those with chronic illness. He treated Candida albicans, often seen as esophageal candidiasis, an infection prevalent in HIV/AIDS and cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, and aspergillosis, an infection caused by aspergillus fumigatis, a family of common moulds that can cause symptoms ranging from cough to brain damage. The oral formulation proved effective and minimally toxic against both infections. A clinical study of the drug delivery system, involving 50-100 patients, is planned for later this year. A form of invasive candidiasis called candidemia is the fourth most common bloodstream infection among hospitalized patients in the U.S. A survey conducted at CDCP found that candidemia occurs in eight of every 100,000 persons per year. Persons at high risk include low-birth-weight babies and surgical patients. Incidence of invasive aspergillosis was five-10 per 1,000, according to an analysis of medical records of 35,232 HIV-infected patients who attended outpatient clinics in 10 U.S. cities between 1990 and 1998, according to Health Canada. Research funding for this project has been provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada's major agency responsible for funding health research. Composed of 13 Institutes, CIHR provides leadership and support to more than 10,000 health researchers and trainees across Canada. Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by University of British Columbia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2007 Report Share Posted March 6, 2007 how interesting, oral,minimal side effects, in the blood, toxic effects. hummmm, yet we are supposed to believe that eating molds/myco's hurt you more than inhaleing them where they get into your blood stream. > > Source: University of British Columbia > Date: March 5, 2007 > More on: Kidney Disease, Diseases and Conditions, Today's > Healthcare, Pharmacology, Urology, Fungus > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070305141208.htm > > Researcher Finds New Way To Treat Devastating Fungal Infections > > > Science Daily — Devastating blood-borne fungal infections that can > be lethal for HIV/AIDS, cancer, and organ transplant patients may be > treated more successfully, thanks to a new drug delivery method > developed by researchers at the University of British Columbia in > Vancouver. > > Pharmaceutical Sciences Prof. Kishor M. Wasan has created a liquid > preparation that incorporates drug molecules in fat (lipid-based > formulation) so that Amphotericin B, a potent anti-fungal agent, can > be taken by mouth with minimal side effects. The agent, used for > about 50 years, is currently administered intravenously and has > significant toxic side effects, notably severe kidney toxicity as > well as serious tissue damage at the intravenous injection site. > > Wasan and his research team have discovered that the oral > preparation triggers a different molecular interaction than > intravenous delivery. The lipid-based system attacks fungal cells > only while inhibiting the drug's interaction with kidney cells -- > boosting effectiveness and dramatically reducing toxicity. > > The research findings will be presented today at a meeting sponsored > by the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists in > Washington, D.C. Findings will be published in July 2007 in Drug > Development and Industrial Pharmacy. > > Because the oral form of the drug is easier to administer and > cheaper than intravenous delivery, Wasan predicts that more > patients -- especially those in underserved areas and developing > countries -- would have access to the medicine. He notes that > Amphotericin B is also used to treat Leishmaniasis, a parasitic > disease that affects an estimated two million people worldwide > according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP) > in the U.S. > > " This research was triggered by clinicians needing a way to kill > these fungal infections without risking the patient's kidney, " says > Wasan, who is a Distinguished University Scholar and a Canadian > Institutes of Health Research Chair in Drug Development. " Despite > antifungal agents, treating these infections is difficult and > challenges researchers to find better outcomes for the patient. " > > Wasan tested the drug delivery method, in animal models, against two > fungal infections seen in their most severe forms in people with > suppressed immune systems, such as surgical patients and those with > chronic illness. > > He treated Candida albicans, often seen as esophageal candidiasis, > an infection prevalent in HIV/AIDS and cancer patients receiving > chemotherapy, and aspergillosis, an infection caused by aspergillus > fumigatis, a family of common moulds that can cause symptoms ranging > from cough to brain damage. The oral formulation proved effective > and minimally toxic against both infections. > > A clinical study of the drug delivery system, involving 50-100 > patients, is planned for later this year. A form of invasive > candidiasis called candidemia is the fourth most common bloodstream > infection among hospitalized patients in the U.S. A survey conducted > at CDCP found that candidemia occurs in eight of every 100,000 > persons per year. Persons at high risk include low-birth-weight > babies and surgical patients. > > Incidence of invasive aspergillosis was five-10 per 1,000, according > to an analysis of medical records of 35,232 HIV-infected patients > who attended outpatient clinics in 10 U.S. cities between 1990 and > 1998, according to Health Canada. > > Research funding for this project has been provided by the Canadian > Institutes of Health Research, Canada's major agency responsible for > funding health research. Composed of 13 Institutes, CIHR provides > leadership and support to more than 10,000 health researchers and > trainees across Canada. > > Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by > University of British Columbia. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2007 Report Share Posted March 6, 2007 Jeanine, This kind of statement of yours is one of the reasons why I admire your posts.. Gets to the point.. and what a good point it is... >how interesting, oral,minimal side effects, in the blood, toxic effects. hummmm, yet we are supposed to believe that eating molds/myco's hurt you more than inhaleing them where they get into your blood stream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2007 Report Share Posted March 6, 2007 Thanks Live, I just call it like I see it. I've lived through it and educated myself on it and have a pretty good understanding on it now. like you, I get aggervated at the TBI because it hinders my ability to put it in a documented form. but anyway, those animals studies have always bugged me, theri noses are right by theri mouth, and I really dont recall any animals really chowing down on something moldy, but eating around it might cause myco's/voc's to be in the air and they go up the animals nose. animals get the same effects as us, all routes of exposure are sure to play a role, just like us.if theri in a moldy barn with moldy hay they will get sick.if piglets are liveing and eating around a pig feeder full of moldy corn, they will get sick.bug's(mold feeders) would be eating on the mold and seems like the toxic molds would be putting out a lot on toxins in the air. I just think all the documents on animal studies should be great evidence of what happens to us. I'm not saying they dont eat some, even if they eat around really bad parts theri still eating some, just like we are if theri in our environment.there is no difference in what happens to animals and what happens to us, maybe just the difference in what effects from what route of exposure happen first and/or most.obviously, some animal environments are worse than our moldy environments. > > Jeanine, > > This kind of statement of yours is one of the reasons why I admire your > posts.. > > Gets to the point.. and what a good point it is... > > > >how interesting, oral,minimal side effects, in the blood, toxic > effects. hummmm, yet we are supposed to believe that eating > molds/myco's hurt you more than inhaleing them where they get into > your blood stream. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.