Guest guest Posted March 9, 2007 Report Share Posted March 9, 2007 I was recently talking with a doctor about the terms allergic and allergy and it came to me that the terms mean very different things o doctors and laypeople, and that the defense in mold cases is exploiting that difference to prevent people from getting healthy homes or justice.. It seems like to me that to a doctor, 'allergic' describes the physiological reaction of the immune system to a substance, and its entirely possible that a particular substance can and does provoke a violent 'allergic' reaction in 100% of the subjects exposed (or really poisoned) at a particular level, which makes them all dangerously sick permanently, which means that when they are exposed to that substance again, even at lower levels they get a recurrence of the reaction. This is the way it is in that eosinophilic esophagitis paper.. The nine doses of intranasal aspergillus fumigatus induced eosinophilic esophagitis in all of the mice so treated. 100% Most LAYpeople would not associate that PERCENTAGE with an 'allergic' reaction.. But doctors, in particular ALLERGISTS can and DO. Because they are talking about physiological things like antibodies, etc. NOT the causative factors.. Basically, the allergen would be more likely to be seen as a poison by laypeople in the context of 100% of the people being exposed at that high level getting sick... To laypeople, when they hear the word 'allergic' they tend to think 'low percentage of people', and often that means 'NOT ME' and then take the bait and blame the victim and not the causer.. Even if the poisoning was avoidable.. Even though in some situations the situation can be so intense as to be life-threatening... If we are going to change the situation with toxic but also 'allergic' molds like aspergillus fumigatus and others.. we need to make people realize that to these folks in the AAAAI, 'allergic' means very different things than it does to us.. And that is a VERY dangerous disconnect to allow to go uncorrected because to them, allergies can and do effect 100% of the exposed.. and that doesn't matter..they still use that word.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.