Guest guest Posted January 30, 2007 Report Share Posted January 30, 2007 " THE TRUTH ABOUT MOLDS? Fungi (Mycotoxins) Can, and Do Cause Disease! " R. Haney (Author: " Toxic Mold Toxic Enemy! " ) Copyright© 2007 A January 9, 2007, a front page Wall Street Journal article titled " Court of Opinion: Amid Suits Over Mold, Experts Wear Two Hats " authored by Armstrong has rekindled a longstanding battle over the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine society's solicitation of a document titled " Adverse Human Health Effects Associated with Molds in the Indoor Environment " authored by a former high-ranked government health official. People who have been suffering from what they say are health issues caused by indoor mold exposures, and several of the medical doctors who treat them are upset, indicating that this document, now used as the ACOEM's " Position Paper " is " seriously flawed. " In response to the Wall Street Journal article, on January 13, 2007, Tee L. Guidotti, M.D., MPH, current President of the ACOEM issued the following statement: " What is lost in the WSJ article is the technical accuracy of the statement. The contentious issue at hand is not damp spaces or the association of mold and mold spores with allergic, infectious, or irritating conditions. It is whether the metabolic products of mold known as mycotoxins, absorbed through biological particle inhalation in indoor air, is responsible for systemic human disease under conditions encountered in normal life, an unproven theory called " toxic mold " in the vernacular. The weight of evidence to date, despite years of investigation, does not support that it is and seems unlikely to shift with new findings. " Unfortunately, Dr. Guidotti fails to comprehend the objective of the WSJ article. It has little to do with scientific findings, and a great deal to do with the perceived impression that the ACOEM is, in effect, using perceivably contrived and distorted facts of " rat study " on " consensus-based acceptance " and not on sound scientific research. The ACOEM official position on molds and health is potentially full of alleged ethics violations, conflicts of interest, and selective manipulation and promotion of flawed research activity on a grand scale! This act threatens to destroy ACOEM's integrity, and gravely harm many victims of such exposures living and working in unhealthy mold infested and contaminated homes, schools, and office buildings. For the president of the ACOEM to blatantly offer that the science is not there to support current medical knowledge, is to claim absolute ignorance of the facts! The fact is that apparently the medical community has chosen to ignore the facts that hospital environments have been treating and recording for nearly 100 years. In highly " controlled " hospital environments there is enough patient- monitored and recorded epidemiological evidence to support a literal landslide of facts that some medically-important micro fungi species are deadly. One has to question, where does disease caused by molds normally occur; in a hospital environment? The answer is " no! " People normally go to hospitals because molds have gained enough strength chemically to disrupt and begin decomposing a live cells one or more at a time after initial exposure in a home, school, or office environment. Medical doctors then send people to the hospital as a consequence of diagnosing a disease that has reached a stage to where it needs special disease control protocol… normally. There are millions more people living in an uncontrolled fungal infested and contaminated home, school, office environment than are observed in a hospital allergen-free " controlled " environment. Doctors also seem to have trouble referencing the words " infestations " and " contaminants, " separately. Simply stated " infestations " represent the growth and binding into colonies or life-forming groups (e.g., live-celled organisms) for the purpose of strength, territorial gain, and species survival. Live-cell species can apply to anything from bees, bacteria, and molds to fish and humans, among the many life-forms existing on earth. " Contaminants " are the chemicals that live, dying, or dead species release as a mechanism for defending their survival, or defeating their enemies after they have died. However, when people who are protecting their own interests, or are hired to protect the interests of others in American enterprise system observe molds, it is fairly easy to understand why they might want to advertise molds as " contaminants " instead of live-celled " infestations. " Bacteria are not recognized as contaminants, and neither are viruses. Why would it be desirable to classify the Aspergillus, Alternaria, Stachybotrys, and other live-celled, contaminate mycotoxin-excreting molds as simply " contaminates, volatile organic compounds (VOC), airborne particulates? " Let spell it out like this. Molds and mycotoxins, unlike bacteria and viruses, are massively used in producing products that keep Americans working and products selling. Molds and mycotoxins are used in the formulation of thousands of products for their odors, coloring, and taste (i.e., foods, drinks, etc.). Molds and their mycotoxins are used in the manufacture of alcohol, tobacco, and even cleaning and/or bleaching products. Molds and the mycotoxins they excrete are used in everything from medicines to natural supplements. In other words, there is a real beneficial purpose in the American economy for molds and yeasts as opposed to other competing microbes. The problem is that molds compete in nature with almost all other forms of live-celled life, and can remain dormant and live in harmony until it is time to perform their natural decomposing tasks. Sometimes, these harmless-appearing ugly microbes found on blocks of cheese and breads are far more deadly than we as humans, give them credit for. There is a good reason for the classification of " opportunists " that medical doctors refer to in identifying molds and yeasts living within the human body! Even the infamous 107-yearold Merck Manual commonly used as a medical reference guide states as to Aspergillus (the most abundant micro fungi species on planet Earth, found indoors) and Aspergillosis, a respiratory disease it is specifically recognized as causing: " Opportunistic infections caused by Aspergillus sp and inhaled as mold conidia, leading to hyphal growth and invasion of blood vessels, hemorrhagic necrosis, infarction, and potential dissemination to other sites in susceptible patients… Aspergillus sp are among the most common environmental molds, found frequently in decaying vegetation (compost heaps), on insulating materials (in walls or ceilings around steel girders, in air conditioning or heating events, in operating…. " And the list on page 1222 of Chapter 158, Section 13, goes on and on. And according to this same Merck Manual, 17 Edition, 8 of the 11 diseases presented are directly related to inhalation! So, either most medical doctors registered as members of the ACOEM are unable to read, or something is wrong in the philosophies endorsed by the ACOEM as a " college " of medical practitioners. Another question that begs an answer is why was the primary author of the ACOEM Position Paper, Harding, PhD (a Principal of Veritox, Inc. (formerly GlobalTox, Inc.) principal author of the ACOEM Position Paper provided with a free membership in the ACOEM in 2002? Prior to 2002, it is my understanding that all registered members of the ACOEM had to be medical doctors, exclusively. Recalling a recorded statement of Ruth Etzel PhD, M.D., in parting ways with her prestigious position within the Centers for Disease Control as one of its most highly-respected medical researchers in Environmental Medicine, that, " The CDC has sought to bury the connection between mold and disease… " (Ref. Mark Moran, WebMed Medical News Interview. July 26th 2000. Titled: " Answers Prove Elusive in Mold-Linked Deaths " ) is extremely important! Why? Because Dr. Etzel's statement offers a direct link to one of the primary " defense experts " of VeriTox, Inc., and ACOEM Position Paper author Hardin, PhD., who it seems was a high-ranking official with NIOSH (with direct working connections with the CDC). Along with Bruce Kelman, PhD, in conjunction with Saxon, M.D., of the UCLA Medical Center, Dr. Hardin authored the ACOEM's Position Paper. Dr. Saxon's connection with government is that he receives grants from federal entities such as the National Institutes of Health, which the CDC falls under. To think that this activity is simply going to be put to rest without critical legal analysis is to be totally oblivious to potential civic and penal ramifications for dealing with such unorthodox activities. According to information on the VeriTox, Inc. website (a company with litigation experts known for their defense antics in providing expert testimony for the purpose of dissuading juries from accepting the idea that exposures to indoor molds infestations and contaminants lead to serious human health problems), Hardin, PhD, FATS, " … was commissioned into the US Public Health Service and began his public health career with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in 1972, where he served in research, policy, and management roles, culminating as Deputy Director of NIOSH and Assistant Surgeon General in the Public Health Service. " To say that Dr. Hardin does not have intimate connections at high levels of government including the CDC, would be a gross misstatement. To believe that many of the medical doctors most influential in processing the ACOEM position paper do not also have similar political connections, would perhaps also fail a scrutiny test. Many Americans who are seriously ill have been putting their faith in an American medical system that is failing them, and unfortunately until there is a major change the mindset of the medical community the American Justice system has to step up to the plate and protect the health and safety of all its American citizenry. R. Haney, Maridea EnviroHealth Research & Consulting, Inc., _Haney52@... PLEASE FEEL FREE TO OFFER ANY PHYSICIAN YOU COME IN CONTACT WITH AS A PATIENT OR KNOW PERSONALLY, A COPY OF THIS IMPORTANT ARTICLE. D. Haney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.