Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 Me too! Thank you Barb. On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 13:18:54 -0000, you wrote: > I would rather be healthy than a sick >member of a class action lawsuit myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 Live, It's not a perfect solution I'll give you that much. On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:12:37 -0400, you wrote: >Oh, they would just LOVE this.. > >You can't be serious.. > >You don't see how they would manipulate this to get out of SO MANY CRIMES? >How easy it would be for them? > >Just think. Its kind of like Brer Rabbit and the briar patch. > >This is like those scam 'class action lawsuit' situations where they get >immunity forever and only >have to pay a pittance to the actual victims. > >On 3/23/07, barb1283 <barb1283@...> wrote: >> >> This is a very good suggestion . This would keep otherwise >> responsible people from avoiding disclosure. There always will be >> those that will lie to protect their future profits. Only thing that >> could be done is show they knew in the past tense and had this >> opportunity to be forthcoming and did not and those people/companies >> would be liable for lawsuit and extra financial punishment for not >> revealing at time they discovered it. I like your suggestion enough >> to send it to my congressman or woman. >> >> >> > >> >I think their should be some kind of law where they can disclose their >> > findings when they discover them and have FULL immunity. Than and >> only >> > than can they be responsible without being destroyed in the process. >> > >> > Once this liability is lifted MD's won't feel the pressure to lie to >> > us anymore. >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 I was thinking more along the lines of products like asbestos, breast implants, industrial illnesses, vaccines, car defects. All things we need and want until they harm us and than we change our minds. But Live has a good point. If we do this what's to stop a already sloppy industry from becoming even more sloppy. Like I said it's not perfect. My thinking was all the lives that could have been saved if we stopped using asbestos as soon as we knew their was a problem or breast implant's, or vaccines, etc. It seems now that they continue to produce them just to give the appearance that everything is ok with them knowing that their just killing more people simply to give the appearance that their is no problem with it. That and to see how far they can pinch a penny. I think we can all agree that pesticide company's actions are unconscionable. They are needlessly destroying people and the environment and no one seems to care. And it's completely premeditated. They know beyond a shadow of a doubt what they are doing. I have no doubt they know their products cause mold sensitivity and continue to market them regardless. I just heard on the radio that atrazine is affecting plankton adversely in the ocean. Do I need to spell out what happens if the ocean dies? Let's put it this way, we won't have to worry about the greenhouse effect anymore. I often marvel at the crap we throw at this planet and it still seems able to support us. Truly amazing, but for how long? I really think a lot of the people marketing this crap don't care becuase they figure they won't be around to have to deal with it when it finally does take it's toll. \\ On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:36:54 -0000, you wrote: >I agree with live, honest people wouldn't use something they thought >would hurt someone, the effects of toxin exposure has been played down >for to long already and many know exactly what the risks are, I wont >give them any credit for playing dumb, or not going that extra effort >to to ensure safety(ex. EPA allowing use of pesticides that were tested >and known to cause harm to animals). screwing someone over for money or >belonfings is a little different than risking theri health or lives. >you mess with the health of the ones I love and your going to be >dealing with me and its not going to be a oh, ok, you just made a >mistake kind of thing.people who have little consern of other lives is >what has brought us all here. one way or another. >> >> So you are willing to sacrifice your life then? How generous of you. >> >> > This is a gray area though, where is that line? Their are many >> unknowns about chemicals and when we use products we take unknown >> risk's that usually don't surface for a long time. I believe the >> risk's are worth it though. >> >> >> http://www.ehponline.org/realfiles/docs/2006/8297/abstract.html >> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 It's only part of the solution. Greed and people with criminal minds will always be working to find away around any system. It would only protect people who want to do the right thing but don't come forward out of fear of losing their " all they own " in many cases. They still would have much loss, homes that noone can inhabit, product that cannot be sold after perhaps decades of creating. That is enough loss for honest people who were trying to do honest business. Still have to get lobbiest out of Washington and government regulations and real institutes of science that aren't run by industry but government, an FDA that is not full of pharmacy connections. --- In , Christ <antares@...> wrote: > > I was thinking more along the lines of products like asbestos, breast > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 THANKS... > > > > I AM IN MY MID 30'S AND I STARTED GETING FLOATERS AFTER MY EXPOSURE > > ABOUT FIVE YEARS AGO... I FIRST THTOUGHT IT WAS JUST MY EYES SIGHT > > GETTING WORSE BECAUSE I WEAR CONTACTS BUT I NOW KNOW IT'S THE > > MOLD.... MY DAUGHTER, SINCE THE EXPOSURE, NOW WEARS GLASSES AND SHE > > HAD PERFECT VISION.... YET THESE DOCTORS DON'T WANT TO LISTEN TO > > ANYONE ABOUT MOLD ILLNESSES, ESPECIALLY IF YOU HAVE AN HMO.... I'VE > > BEEN FIGHTING THIS BATTLE WITH THE DOCTORS, THE INSURANCE COMPANIES > > AND DISABILITY FOR THE PAST FIVE YEARS WITH NO END IN SIGHT... GOOD > > LUCK TO EVERYONE WHO IS BATTLING MOLD TOXICITY.... DANA > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 Hi Doug, Now I understand what you mean - the dots seem to make the string segmented. I see that too- Val Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2007 Report Share Posted March 25, 2007 HI Doug, Yes, I have heard that the psychiatrist is usually worse off than the patient - I like the name of your job though. I think most psychological problems have a biological base if not all. That is the real shame of how we treat people with mental illness in the US. But I don't mind being " crazy " - it is a badge of honor with this- take care, Val Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.