Guest guest Posted March 19, 2007 Report Share Posted March 19, 2007 Yes, but it was nearly 30 years ago. Extremely high levels of DDT. Mold wasn't an issue then. Keep in mind that all methods have strengths and weaknesses, which means no single test is totally comprehensive. The main limitation on fat biopsies is inherent in its name " FAT biopsy. " Only the fat soluable substances that accumulate will be found with any consistency. The water soluable ones flush out rather quickly with sweat and urine. Others will know better than me what the potential accuracy and reliability is for mold mycotoxins. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- > has anyone had a fat biopsy? > <http://www.mycotoxin-test.com/pages/1/index.htm> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2007 Report Share Posted March 20, 2007 okay - I'm gonna put my ass out on a limb and say that I'd be REALLY careful about whom I chose to do this sort of test. The link you supplied makes some wildly grandiose claims of what is being tested from my VERY limited knowledge, and I'd want to get confirmation from others on this site that the medical standards are where they need to be. One of my first measures in ANY situation where determining health is on the line, I want to feel assured that I'm going to get the best information out there. One way to do this is to 'follow the money.' As we know, there are so-called 'professionals' out there who make a living working for the defense in court cases and have a vested interest in keeping that line of work coming and keeping info about mold from getting accepted. So, too, are there 'professionals' who have attracted large sums for plaintiff attorneys. As patients, I think it's important that we go for the most accuracy and to choose to work with a medical team whose first priority is our health and the truth and who don't have their salaries as a primary source of motivation. And we can take this off-line if you want to hear more from me on this topic... ~Haley " Carl E. Grimes " <grimes@...> wrote: Yes, but it was nearly 30 years ago. Extremely high levels of DDT. Mold wasn't an issue then. Keep in mind that all methods have strengths and weaknesses, which means no single test is totally comprehensive. The main limitation on fat biopsies is inherent in its name " FAT biopsy. " Only the fat soluable substances that accumulate will be found with any consistency. The water soluable ones flush out rather quickly with sweat and urine. Others will know better than me what the potential accuracy and reliability is for mold mycotoxins. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- > has anyone had a fat biopsy? > <http://www.mycotoxin-test.com/pages/1/index.htm> ~Haley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2007 Report Share Posted March 20, 2007 Yea, that website seemed pretty strange to me yesterday when I read it as well but again, what do I know, basically nothing. All I could gather was one collects body fluid and sends it to them. The website had no instruction on how this is done. Maybe I am having a blond moment, as usual but I too saw the website as strange...I agree, be careful. > > okay - I'm gonna put my ass out on a limb and say that I'd be REALLY careful about whom I chose to do this sort of test. The link you supplied makes some wildly grandiose claims of what is being tested from my VERY limited knowledge, and I'd want to get confirmation from others on this site that the medical standards are where they need to be. > > One of my first measures in ANY situation where determining health is on the line, I want to feel assured that I'm going to get the best information out there. One way to do this is to 'follow the money.' As we know, there are so-called 'professionals' out there who make a living working for the defense in court cases and have a vested interest in keeping that line of work coming and keeping info about mold from getting accepted. So, too, are there 'professionals' who have attracted large sums for plaintiff attorneys. As patients, I think it's important that we go for the most accuracy and to choose to work with a medical team whose first priority is our health and the truth and who don't have their salaries as a primary source of motivation. > > And we can take this off-line if you want to hear more from me on this topic... > > ~Haley > > " Carl E. Grimes " <grimes@...> wrote: Yes, but it was nearly 30 years ago. Extremely high levels of DDT. > Mold wasn't an issue then. Keep in mind that all methods have > strengths and weaknesses, which means no single test is totally > comprehensive. The main limitation on fat biopsies is inherent in its > name " FAT biopsy. " Only the fat soluable substances that accumulate > will be found with any consistency. The water soluable ones flush out > rather quickly with sweat and urine. Others will know better than me > what the potential accuracy and reliability is for mold mycotoxins. > > Carl Grimes > Healthy Habitats LLC > > ----- > > has anyone had a fat biopsy? > > <http://www.mycotoxin-test.com/pages/1/index.htm> > > > > > > > ~Haley > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2007 Report Share Posted March 20, 2007 yes, I wondered about the site myself. just wondering about fat biopsys and if anyone ever had one, if it showed anything. --- In , " jackiebreeze " <jackiebreeze@...> wrote: > > Yea, that website seemed pretty strange to me yesterday when I read > it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2007 Report Share Posted March 20, 2007 Haley,I couldn't agree more. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2007 Report Share Posted March 20, 2007 Thanks Carl, this is the hard part. understanding what stays in your system and for how long. with MCS it's hard to know if it's something still in your tissues or new insults that keep the infections from not healing. --- In , " Carl E. Grimes " <grimes@...> wrote: > > Yes, but it was nearly 30 years ago. Extremely high levels of DDT. > Mold wasn't an issue then. Keep in mind that all methods have > strengths and weaknesses, which means no single test is totally > comprehensive. The main limitation on fat biopsies is inherent in its > name " FAT biopsy. " Only the fat soluable substances that accumulate > will be found with any consistency. The water soluable ones flush out > rather quickly with sweat and urine. Others will know better than me > what the potential accuracy and reliability is for mold mycotoxins. > > Carl Grimes > Healthy Habitats LLC > > ----- > > has anyone had a fat biopsy? > > <http://www.mycotoxin-test.com/pages/1/index.htm> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.