Guest guest Posted April 12, 2007 Report Share Posted April 12, 2007 State: No deal on moldy home Questions raised on COAH funds Wednesday, April 11, 2007 BY RALPH R. ORTEGA Star-Ledger Staff The Star-Ledger Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:48 PM PDT http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/somerset/index.ssf?/base/news- 2/11762697469960.xml & coll=1 Officials in a Somerset County town poised to spend more than $400,000 in affordable housing funds to rebuild a woman's mold- infested home, said the plan to avoid a lawsuit was idle yesterday after state officials claimed they never gave their consent. A letter from the Council on Affordable Housing written to Bridgewater Mayor Flannery Thursday explained an e-mail relied upon by township officials to go forward with the plan to rebuild Elliott's house on Foothill Road, " in no way should be interpreted to be a specific approval by COAH for the expenditure of over $400,000 from the affordable housing trust fund. " COAH Executive Director Lucy Voorhoeve wrote in bold letters in the letter, " If the township plans to expend the funds, or has already done so, and the expense turns out to be ineligible, the township shall be responsible for reimbursement of the funds. " Township officials yesterday said the plan won't have final approval until COAH's concerns are addressed. Township Administrator Naples insisted the plan to use the affordable housing money had been appropriate. " We never did anything to skirt those rules in any such way, " said Naples. Township Attorney B. Savo said he was first phoned by COAH a week ago, after a story appeared in The Star-Ledger about the deal that had been worked out with Elliott. He said he believed state officials only raised concerns because of the story. " Isn't that cute? " Savo said, in response to COAH's rejection of an e-mail approval used for Elliott. He added, " most people do business by e-mail and fax. " Elliott, a once-prominent real estate agent, claimed she can no longer do " 90 percent " of her work because of health problems from exposure to a decade-old mold-infestation in her home. She blamed the mold on the township's negligence, accusing township employees of allowing drainage problems from private residences and private roadwork that caused the infestation. In addition, she provided medical reports that indicated she was " sensitive " to mold, according to Savo. After a township-hired contractor botched a remediation of the infestation, a settlement was worked out to avert a costly lawsuit, said Savo. Elliott's current lawyer, Lime, said Bridgewater could have faced a loss of " seven figures, " had she gone to court. The settlement, hashed out over two years, would spend more than $400,000 rebuilding the home, and give Elliott the first $150,000 from any monetary award that comes from a lawsuit Bridgewater plans to file against the contractor. The township also will " assist " Elliott in applying for a subdivision of her 1 acre property, according to Savo, who said the land was incorrectly subdivided by the township. If zoning officials hearing an application for the subdivision next month give it their approval, Elliott will end up having rights to two properties, and can sell any one of them at her pleasure. She also will not have to repay the money spent to rebuild her home, Savo said. Township officials said Elliott's income loss had qualified her for the COAH funding. The money, collected from developer fees, is generally used to rehabilitate the homes of property owners who qualify, according to officials. In the e-mail sent by a COAH assistant planner, , to Savo on Sept. 20, never addresses Elliott's case specifically. She does say a home " previously occupied, and an eligible household for (the township) rehabilitation program...would be considered a rehabilitation project. " " Bridgewater can use development fees to fund the rehabilitation program since it is stated in the municipality's spending plan. There is no maximum on the amount of money the municipality can spend on each unit, " wrote . " It's disappointing when the state sends something in writing, and you can't rely on it, " said Savo yesterday. COAH Executive Director Lucy Voorhoeve's letter requests a copy of Elliott's " income-qualification file, " and a timeline of her case leading up to 's e-mail. It also asks for a copy of the township's affordable housing rehabilitation manual, and contractor " write ups, " for the proposed home reconstruction. Savo vowed to comply with the demands, and the township would " abide by COAH's decision " to determine going ahead with the deal. Ralph R. Ortega may be reached at rortega@... or (908) 429-9925. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.