Guest guest Posted December 21, 1999 Report Share Posted December 21, 1999 What was really odd about this Susie was while I was waiting for my turn to come to have my blood drawn, I set up my meter and took my reading. I was told that one should do this to see how their fasting blood sugar readings compare to your machine once their results come back....well, when I did it it came up 103 and then when she saw me she said that once she got my blood she would take a drop of it and put it in my machine, that that is how you are supposed to verify your machine VS their results. Well, what a difference it was from her 85 to me doing it and getting 103. We laughed and I told her I would take her results any day! Now it will be interesting to see what number the lab comes up with!!! I also had my cholesterol and all sorts of things tested at the same time, so once I hear I will post the results. Meniowl@... type2,dx7/99,d & water aerobics In a message dated 12/21/1999 9:55:55 AM Pacific Standard Time, ottercritter@... writes: << Meniowl wrote: << Went yesterday for blood work and my AM fasting blood sugar was 85!!! >> As we used to say in North Dakota: " Holy smokes!! " That is just super! We would be glad to hear your blood test results, when you get them. We feel as if we are walking medical experiments - being the first generation of diabetics capable of achieving truly excellent diabetes control, and we are eager to discover whether it is possible to avoid all diabetic complications by low-carbing and other techniques to keep our numbers as normal as possible. Susie - >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 1999 Report Share Posted December 21, 1999 Susie, I love ya, girl, but I sure wish youd say that we avoid complications through " nutrition " and other techniques. Low-carbing doesn't work for all of us. Teri Re: Introduction > > > Meniowl wrote: > > << Went yesterday for blood work and my AM fasting blood sugar was 85!!! >> > > As we used to say in North Dakota: " Holy smokes!! " That is just super! We > would be glad to hear your blood test results, when you get them. We feel as > if we are walking medical experiments - being the first generation of > diabetics capable of achieving truly excellent diabetes control, and we are > eager to discover whether it is possible to avoid all diabetic complications > by low-carbing and other techniques to keep our numbers as normal as > possible. > > Susie > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 1999 Report Share Posted December 21, 1999 Teri writes: << I love ya, girl, but I sure wish youd say that we avoid complications through " nutrition " and other techniques. Low-carbing doesn't work for all of us. >> Good point, Teri. My observations are totally unscientific, but if I could come up with a generality, it would be that the older we are and the longer we have been diabetic, the more likely it is that our pancreas is failing. And the worse our pancreas is, the more we are likely to spike with carbohydrate intake. So those who are younger, and whose diagnosis is more recent, as well as those type 2's who are not insulin-resistant, and whose weight is normal, can do well using a different approach. At first, I was sure that lowering carbohydrate intake was the only way to fly. But there are many diabetics who do nicely on 200-300 grams of carbs a day. There are even vegetarians who report success. I think the one rule of thumb could be that mixing plenty of carbs with plenty of fats spells trouble. And I guess that is why pizza has been deemed the worst possible food for diabetics that we have so far discovered. And the mix of plentiful carbs and plentiful fats is the typical meal at a fast-food joint. Ron Sebol has said time after time that the fast spikes such as we might see after eating a carby meal are not as harmful in the long run as the long spikes we tend to get when eating a meal high in both carbs and fats. It's the sustained highs that he is convinced impact our HbA1c - and do the damage to our organs. Many of us find we can " walk off " our carbs by taking a brisk walk after a meal, or engaging in other exercise. Whatever approach works for us, without causing harm to other organs, that we find we can live with, should be encouraged. Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 1999 Report Share Posted December 21, 1999 I was agreeing with you all the way (except for a quibble about the age business) until you got to pizza. My experience with pizza is that it is no worse for me than any other starchy type of carbohydrate. I love it with anchovies and if I stay away from all or most of the crust, I don't have a problem Susie wrote: > > > Teri writes: > > << I love ya, girl, but I sure wish youd say that we avoid complications > through " nutrition " and other techniques. Low-carbing doesn't work for all > of us. >> > > Good point, Teri. My observations are totally unscientific, but if I could > come up with a generality, it would be that the older we are and the longer > we have been diabetic, the more likely it is that our pancreas is failing. > And the worse our pancreas is, the more we are likely to spike with > carbohydrate intake. So those who are younger, and whose diagnosis is more > recent, as well as those type 2's who are not insulin-resistant, and whose > weight is normal, can do well using a different approach. > > At first, I was sure that lowering carbohydrate intake was the only way to > fly. But there are many diabetics who do nicely on 200-300 grams of carbs a > day. There are even vegetarians who report success. I think the one rule of > thumb could be that mixing plenty of carbs with plenty of fats spells > trouble. And I guess that is why pizza has been deemed the worst possible > food for diabetics that we have so far discovered. And the mix of plentiful > carbs and plentiful fats is the typical meal at a fast-food joint. > > Ron Sebol has said time after time that the fast spikes such as we might see > after eating a carby meal are not as harmful in the long run as the long > spikes we tend to get when eating a meal high in both carbs and fats. It's > the sustained highs that he is convinced impact our HbA1c - and do the > damage to our organs. Many of us find we can " walk off " our carbs by taking > a brisk walk after a meal, or engaging in other exercise. Whatever approach > works for us, without causing harm to other organs, that we find we can live > with, should be encouraged. > > Susie > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 1999 Report Share Posted December 21, 1999 Oneil wrote: << I was agreeing with you all the way (except for a quibble about the age business) until you got to pizza. My experience with pizza is that it is no worse for me than any other starchy type of carbohydrate. I love it with anchovies and if I stay away from all or most of the crust, I don't have a problem >> I should have emphasized that the Glycemic Index testing that showed pizza spiking glucose for 12-14 hours included the whole shebang ... not just the toppings. Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 1999 Report Share Posted December 21, 1999 I've been reading " The Glucose Revolution. " Very interesting book about the glycemic index. Re: Introduction > > > Oneil wrote: > > << I was agreeing with you all the way (except for a quibble about the age > business) until you got to pizza. My experience with pizza is that it is no > worse for me than any other starchy type of carbohydrate. I love it with > anchovies and if I stay away from all or most of the crust, I don't have a > problem >> > > I should have emphasized that the Glycemic Index testing that showed pizza > spiking glucose for 12-14 hours included the whole shebang ... not just the > toppings. > > Susie > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 1999 Report Share Posted December 21, 1999 Teri wrote: << I've been reading " The Glucose Revolution. " Very interesting book about the glycemic index. >> I am a lackadaisical type. I used to say that all carbs were a problem. But Ron Sebol, who is amazingly gutsy about sticking himself over and over to prove a point, has shown graphs he constructed that back up the Glycemic Index. Dr. Wolover and the researchers at Toronto University swear by it. And diabetes expert Rick Mendosa all support relying on it. There was a brouhaha in " Diabetes Forecast " a few years ago (March '97?) between the Toronto researchers and other researchers at Stanford University regarding the Glycemic Index. The ADA has decided against recommending it, on the grounds that it is tough enough managing diabetes without also having to consult a separate list of foods. But the longer I hang around, the more I agree that, if possible, we should factor in the Glycemic Index of the foods we select. My only quibble with the Glycemic Index is that, when I first read about it at Rick Mendosa's site, it made me think we were supposed to choose foods only from among that listing. (His list basically covers carbohydrates, since fats aren't glucose spikers, and meats impact glucose levels only modestly.) I forwarded my concerns to Rick and he, always open to comments and eager to help his fellow diabetics, has added explanatory language, I believe. Rick Mendosa has joined forces with popular diabetes authors Barbara Toohey and June Biermann. You can explore their wide-ranging, lively diabetes web site at: http://www.diabeteswebsite.com You can customize the site to match your individual interests. They have just released a brand-new version of their well-known " The Diabetic's Book, " which now includes a section on low-carbing. Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 1999 Report Share Posted December 21, 1999 Pizza -- the carb count: Pizza Hut -- 1 slice, Meatlovers medium pan pizza - 28 g carb, 18 g. fat. (And who can eat just one slice?) Personal Pan Pizza - Pepperoni -- 69 g carb; 28 g. fat. (I usually quit at 35-40 g. carbs for the whole meal.) At 02:41 PM 12/21/99 -0500, you wrote: > > >Oneil wrote: > ><< I was agreeing with you all the way (except for a quibble about the age >business) until you got to pizza. My experience with pizza is that it is no >worse for me than any other starchy type of carbohydrate. I love it with >anchovies and if I stay away from all or most of the crust, I don't have a >problem >> > >I should have emphasized that the Glycemic Index testing that showed pizza >spiking glucose for 12-14 hours included the whole shebang ... not just the >toppings. > >Susie > > in Constable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2005 Report Share Posted March 21, 2005 On 10 Mar 2005, shealaver commented: > neighbouring child. At high school, I could never concentrate in > the classes that weren't in my particular perseverations at the > time. Fortunately, I can remember most everything I hear and was > able to graduate with B-grades in every class except English. This is probably very Aspie of me, but reading your message made me start thinking about myself -- my own particular perseveration, I suppose. <grin> When I was in high school, there were classes where I did extremely well, and classes where I sucked, with no particular middle of the road. And I begin to think that there's a causality there. Which classes did I do well in, and which classes did I do badly in? Computer programming. Obvious AS connection there, huh? First year Algebra I did well. Manipulating symbols following clear and specific rules. Also, I initially had serious problems with common and natural logs. Then I stopped after class and asked my Algebra teacher to explain log tables to me. He made everything clear, specific and step-by-step, without a lot of extraneous theory about why they worked the way they did. Took about five minutes, and I never had trouble with them again. Did badly in second-year Algebra. That was a required course to go to college, so the class I was in was huge, seems like it was 50-60 kids in the class, maybe more, total chaos. Go figure I had a problem with it. Strangely enough, although I always had a horrible time trying to just talk to people, face to face, I took Public Speaking class in my senior year, and did quite well. I went from there to competitive public speaking, and turned out to be quite good at that. Talking to people without having to respond to what anyone else said, and with everyone sitting quietly and listening to me. Appearing to make eye contact with a whole room full of people, which means making actual eye contact with nobody at all. Did poorly in enough in English classes and Social Studies classes that I didn't graduate with my Senior class. Took English in summer school, Social Studies in night school. The summer English class was very rigidly organized, all rules and procedures and diagrams, and I kicked butt on it. The Social Studies was almost all independent study in a chaotic (and cold) classroom. Barely passed. I spent relatively little of my senior year of high school in class. The stresses of social expectations became overwhelming for me, so I simply walked away. I'm a big believer in following the rules, and I never did approve of ditching school. But I did it countless times that year. This was 1976, so I don't even know offhand if Lorna Wing had even rediscovered Hans Asperger's work yet. It seems that whether I did well or poorly in my classes was damn near in lockstep with my needs as an Aspie, although this was twenty- some years before I figured out I was AS. To coin a phrase, go figure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 hi my name is carrie i rsd and apparently had it for 10 yrs but backwards drs in Alaska couldnt diagnose a hangnail without colorful pictures attached to their foreheads so i didnt get diagnosed till 2 years ago by then i was in late stage of rsd. lousy (can i say that? (sorry serious frustration)) drs everywhere see an invisable pain as no pain. mine came from a car accident. im a single mom of 3 mostly grown now, allthough they were raised with out being able to hug me much or do much of anything, i hope this disease didnt harm my childrens veiw on life or relationships. Hugs n Pain perfect name for this group, a concept my family and i know all to well. This rsd is in majority of my body. hope to hear from you guys soon bye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 In a message dated 12/26/2008 9:12:05 P.M. Central Standard Time, mom4ever1988@... writes: Hugs n Pain perfect name for this group, a concept my family and i know all to well Welcome ...glad to have you as one of our HUGS family. I loved your description of your doctors being able to diagnose a hangnail....hahaha I think a sense of humor helps alot. I'm a grandma of 11 and have RSD along with other nerve damages. I look forward to yakking with ya later. CYH! Cheryl **************One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail, Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp & icid=aolcom40vanity & ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.