HIV is NOT the Cause of AIDS!

[Guest guest]

By O. Young D.Sc., Ph.D

http://articlesofhealth.blogspot.com/2007/05/second-thoughts-about-

hivaids.html

In the first recorded AIDS patient, a yeast infestation of the lungs

brought on pneumonia and oral thrush. This thick overgrowth of

candida with their acidic mycotoxins choked the patient to death. He

died from an overdose of mycotoxins (acids) rather than the ravages

of the retrovirus. A Way Home Cellular immunity is not the first

line of defense against out-fections.

HIV is NOT the Cause of AIDS!

No scientific literature exists that proves HIV is the cause of AIDS

or any other illness. Its validity is based on officious

pronouncements by a one-time authority at the National Institutes of

Health (NIH) and based on a narrow range of behavior in lab-

controlled environments.

It is the same supposed authority, Dr. Gallo, head of key NIH

cancer labs, beginning in 1974, who would become the driving force

behind the expenditure of more than $1 billion in cancer research.

This is the same research that has produced much faulty research

while accompanied by the growth of an AIDS epidemic out of control.

During this time, the same authority was granted two patents whose

value depended upon the belief or perception that HIV is really the

cause of AIDS. The patents involved the development of blood tests

for HIV and the mechanism behind the screening of huge volumes of

blood donated for treatment of this so-called virus.

With western medical scientists and researchers possessing little or

no understanding of the acid-alkaline foundation of the body, AIDS

became a modern-day label applied to a combination of immune

deficiencies that highlight a group of symptoms. The symptoms were

then said to be related because they occurred together much like a

headache and a backache and an upset stomach might all occur

together. They were then labeled with the AIDS terminology and

accompanying faulty explanatory system.

To further energize this medical fiasco, public attention was then

sparked by using statistical manipulation and juxtaposition of data,

faulty research methodology, and media sensationalism to fuel the

creation of public fear. The errors were also bred, in part, by a

lack of scientific depth and breadth as well as a narrow

understanding of health and disease and the alkaline design of the

human body.

By conceptualizing and referring to this many-faceted syndrome as a

unitary disease, irresponsible public health leadership has

reinforced the notion that this simple yet misunderstood phenomenon

can somehow cause the entire collapse of the powerful human immune

system. Logical questions would query whether the collapse of the

immune system can be blamed on a nearly undetectable virus or a

virus that has even yet to be identified. Upon objective examination

using appropriate research hypotheses and controlled methodology, it

would be discovered that the cause of the constellation of symptoms

lies elsewhere, and the virus simply does not exist!

They key word is " objective. " Once billions of dollars are spent to

create a new disease entity and a complex series of supposed

treatment regimens, the objectivity of daylight quickly fades into

the dark shadows and narrow dead-end alleys of the self-interested

mind.

The Elastic Bandwagon The HIV/AIDS theory is so elastic that it

literally begs for criticism from reasonable people. Historically,

the lack of objectivity by parties with vested interests have led to

unreasonable assumptions and a sort of " conceptual elasticity. "

Typical of this elasticity is the latent period of the virus which

was originally extended from one year to 12 years and in 2007 has

been further extended to over 20 years.

The HIV dogma is nearly impossible to swallow by knowledgeable

scientists who are willing to take the time and effort to look

closely. So-called experts explain that in spite of the extremely

low incidence of HIV in the body, it somehow mysteriously tricks the

immune system into attacking itself!

Thus, I refer to it as the " HIV/Elastic Theory " (HIV/ET)

The HIV/ET public preoccupation diverts the responsibility for a

health epidemic away from the misconduct of a pharmaceutically-

controlled, conflict-ridden medical tradition. As much as any other

factor, a century of medical practice based on the flawed germ

theory—a theory from which much misdirected thinking begins—

contributes to the AIDS epidemic as much as any other factor. If

only one, single, independent research hospital or laboratory was to

begin clinical research and investigation with open mindedness about

the germ theory, entirely new findings would result over time.

Another contributing factor of the HIV/AIDS debacle has been the

oppressive socioeconomic and political conditions that exist in the

Third World, and to a lesser degree, in parts of North America.

Unique constellations of symptoms found in various parts of the

world create factors that are poorly understood by scientists half a

world away.

These factors include:

a) the corporate dumping of banned drugs on unregulated Third World

markets,

pesticide manufacturing conducting inadequate research,

c) the lack of chemical control education by the general public,

d) commercial pesticide use determined by economic and not human

concerns

e) the lack of publicity for science-demonstrated alternatives to

insect control,

f) a general misunderstanding of the nature and value of so-called

pests,

g) poverty and squalid living conditions, and

h) rain forest destruction.

Factors such as these, and not HIV, must be included as primary

agents when discussing the cause of AIDS and unique clusters of

bodily symptoms. As a microscopist, nutritionist, and public health

educator, I have worked with many HIV-positive individuals who have

remained free of AIDS symptoms for years. Yet, when treated with

prescription drugs like AZT, patients have become ill and died from

a wasting disease in a short time. When this occurs, the cause of

death is blamed on AIDS. Yet AIDS death and AZT then become

virtually indistinguishable.

Pharmaceutical companies are heavily involved in the broader economy

including the chemical industry which is also responsible for

pesticide research and manufacture. The incestuous corporate

relationships among industries extend broadly and the inter-

connections include the majority of chemical, pharmaceutical, food,

agriculture, petroleum and international banking companies.

No " conspiracy theory " is needed here. The relationship among

industrial despots is not the malevolence of active collusion but

the evil that stems from the absence of integrity.

Ask yourself. Is there any major industry in America that has not

seen horrendous front page scandals directly related to problems of

moral character, grasping materialism, bottom-line obsessions, and

leadership integrity? Corporate executives do not have to talk to

each other on the phone. That's dangerous, illegal, and to be

avoided. Monsanto does not have to call Merck who calls Cargill who

calls Archer-s-Midland who calls British Petroleum who calls

the Industrial Commercial Bank of China. That's not how it works.

They all arise at 5 a.m. to check the same overseas markets while

still on the morning treadmill and first cup of coffee. They all

study the same Wall Street Journal, analyze the same markets, track

the same world trends, and study the same forecasts before they make

their same capital-based decisions and send their lobbyists to

Washington D.C. and the same financial capitols across the world.

All major industries have bought into the values dictated by obscene

executive compensation, ruthless world markets and the cut-throat,

competitive marketplace. It is not as if the HIV/ET apologists and

protagonists did note have enough self-enriching motivation to

maintain the economic status quo. Even those individuals who

understand the nature of bodily health and those who have made a

commitment to an alkaline lifestyle must continue to live in a world

dominated by massive environmental influences which work against the

establishment of a correct science leading to a healthy medical and

personal science of health.

The bottom line is that AIDS toxicity as well as cancer and other

degenerative symptoms are produced by large amounts of toxins

(metabolic acids) from many sources in the body along with poor

nutrition, poor sanitation and prescription and recreational drugs.

Toxicity is a result of drug abuse, faulty diet, and poisonous

overgrowth of fungal microorganisms. Fungal organisms are inherent

in the body. Their purpose is to recycle dead material. This is done

by digestion of tissues and further breakdown via acid waste

products. These microorganisms are kept in check by a balanced

biochemistry and are present when our internal terrain becomes

acidic. The problem begins when, prematurely, the organisms receive

a chemical or biological signal that the host is dead and spring

into action. Their poisons cause the body to produce the symptoms of

what we call disease.

A real-life AIDS Scenario One of the first five AIDS cases in

history, a 33 year old Los Angeles male, was engaged in a high-risk

lifestyle. He admitted taking aphrodisiacs used during the 1960s and

70s known as " poppers. "

Poppers are made from animal nitrite, a poisonous mycotoxin (acid).

Some people are familiar with nitrites used in deli meats which are

regulated as potential carcinogens. Few nitrites are more toxic than

the nitrites in poppers which react violently with almost anything.

Nitrites (nitric acid from animal proteins) and the products into

which they break down have long been known to scientists for their

ability to mutate DNA. According to a former nitrite researcher with

the United States Centers for Disease Control, dosage from popper

inhalation is likely to exceed that from eating processed deli meat

by one million times! In addition, these elements are not considered

as critical factors by the so-called scientific community. But

neither are drug abuse in general, dirty needles, over-the-counter

and prescription drugs such as antibiotics, alcohol-consumption,

anti-fungals and other immunosuppressive chemicals, many of which

are present in the HIV positive population.

Popper use has been associated with an AIDS indicator called

pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP). PCP is responsible for half of

the AIDS mortality rates in North America and Europe. Candidiasis is

responsible for another 17%. This means that yeast which is

primarily a symptom of dis-ease contributes to 67% of all AIDS-

related deaths in those countries. However, the drug factor

increases susceptibility to an immune system-destroying " virus, "

even though no one has ever proved that one actually exists.

In the first recorded AIDS patient, a yeast infestation of the lungs

brought on pneumonia and oral thrush. This thick overgrowth of

candida with their acidic mycotoxins choked the patient to death. He

died from an overdose of mycotoxins (acids) rather than the ravages

of the retrovirus. A Way Home Cellular immunity is not the first

line of defense against out-fections.

Fallout from the false germ theory has created the confusion of

symptoms and disease.

Our immune function is our body's (white blood cell) janitorial

service that keeps the body clean and recycles dead material. In

neutralizing the acids from germs and outside toxins, this system

may easily become over-worked or suppressed and is already busy

enough in a healthy body.

The key is not to stimulate the immune system, but to restore it.

The first line of defense is an alkaline balanced and nutrified

system that will prevent biological transformation of body cells to

bacteria, yeast and finally the mold that create the symptoms we

call disease.

[Guest guest]

a cover up sence the 70's, soungs about right.

remember how HIV was gotton from druggies useing dirty needle's, hum,

what do patients in hospitals get from unsterile equipment? most of

what I've read it's either bacterial or fungal.

remember the stink for a while because it seemed no one cared if

these druggies lived or died because they were druggies.

we were so niave than, believeing everything that flashed on the tv.

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index/azt.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AZT

http://www.aids.org/factSheets/411-AZT-Retrovir.html

side effects-anemia,myopathy,neutropenia-a abnormally low count of

neutrophils which increases the risk of fungal infections.

--- In , " tigerpaw2c " <tigerpaw2c@...>

wrote:

>

> By O. Young D.Sc., Ph.D

>

> http://articlesofhealth.blogspot.com/2007/05/second-thoughts-about-

> hivaids.html

>

> In the first recorded AIDS patient, a yeast infestation of the

lungs

> brought on pneumonia and oral thrush. This thick overgrowth of

> candida with their acidic mycotoxins choked the patient to death.

He

> died from an overdose of mycotoxins (acids) rather than the ravages

> of the retrovirus. A Way Home Cellular immunity is not the first

> line of defense against out-fections.

>

> HIV is NOT the Cause of AIDS!

> No scientific literature exists that proves HIV is the cause of

AIDS

> or any other illness. Its validity is based on officious

> pronouncements by a one-time authority at the National Institutes

of

> Health (NIH) and based on a narrow range of behavior in lab-

> controlled environments.

>

> It is the same supposed authority, Dr. Gallo, head of key

NIH

> cancer labs, beginning in 1974, who would become the driving force

> behind the expenditure of more than $1 billion in cancer research.

> This is the same research that has produced much faulty research

> while accompanied by the growth of an AIDS epidemic out of control.

>

> During this time, the same authority was granted two patents whose

> value depended upon the belief or perception that HIV is really the

> cause of AIDS. The patents involved the development of blood tests

> for HIV and the mechanism behind the screening of huge volumes of

> blood donated for treatment of this so-called virus.

>

> With western medical scientists and researchers possessing little

or

> no understanding of the acid-alkaline foundation of the body, AIDS

> became a modern-day label applied to a combination of immune

> deficiencies that highlight a group of symptoms. The symptoms were

> then said to be related because they occurred together much like a

> headache and a backache and an upset stomach might all occur

> together. They were then labeled with the AIDS terminology and

> accompanying faulty explanatory system.

>

> To further energize this medical fiasco, public attention was then

> sparked by using statistical manipulation and juxtaposition of

data,

> faulty research methodology, and media sensationalism to fuel the

> creation of public fear. The errors were also bred, in part, by a

> lack of scientific depth and breadth as well as a narrow

> understanding of health and disease and the alkaline design of the

> human body.

>

> By conceptualizing and referring to this many-faceted syndrome as a

> unitary disease, irresponsible public health leadership has

> reinforced the notion that this simple yet misunderstood phenomenon

> can somehow cause the entire collapse of the powerful human immune

> system. Logical questions would query whether the collapse of the

> immune system can be blamed on a nearly undetectable virus or a

> virus that has even yet to be identified. Upon objective

examination

> using appropriate research hypotheses and controlled methodology,

it

> would be discovered that the cause of the constellation of symptoms

> lies elsewhere, and the virus simply does not exist!

>

> They key word is " objective. " Once billions of dollars are spent to

> create a new disease entity and a complex series of supposed

> treatment regimens, the objectivity of daylight quickly fades into

> the dark shadows and narrow dead-end alleys of the self-interested

> mind.

>

> The Elastic Bandwagon The HIV/AIDS theory is so elastic that it

> literally begs for criticism from reasonable people. Historically,

> the lack of objectivity by parties with vested interests have led

to

> unreasonable assumptions and a sort of " conceptual elasticity. "

> Typical of this elasticity is the latent period of the virus which

> was originally extended from one year to 12 years and in 2007 has

> been further extended to over 20 years.

>

> The HIV dogma is nearly impossible to swallow by knowledgeable

> scientists who are willing to take the time and effort to look

> closely. So-called experts explain that in spite of the extremely

> low incidence of HIV in the body, it somehow mysteriously tricks

the

> immune system into attacking itself!

>

> Thus, I refer to it as the " HIV/Elastic Theory " (HIV/ET)

>

> The HIV/ET public preoccupation diverts the responsibility for a

> health epidemic away from the misconduct of a pharmaceutically-

> controlled, conflict-ridden medical tradition. As much as any other

> factor, a century of medical practice based on the flawed germ

> theory—a theory from which much misdirected thinking begins—

> contributes to the AIDS epidemic as much as any other factor. If

> only one, single, independent research hospital or laboratory was

to

> begin clinical research and investigation with open mindedness

about

> the germ theory, entirely new findings would result over time.

> Another contributing factor of the HIV/AIDS debacle has been the

> oppressive socioeconomic and political conditions that exist in the

> Third World, and to a lesser degree, in parts of North America.

> Unique constellations of symptoms found in various parts of the

> world create factors that are poorly understood by scientists half

a

> world away.

>

> These factors include:

>

> a) the corporate dumping of banned drugs on unregulated Third World

> markets,

> pesticide manufacturing conducting inadequate research,

> c) the lack of chemical control education by the general public,

> d) commercial pesticide use determined by economic and not human

> concerns

> e) the lack of publicity for science-demonstrated alternatives to

> insect control,

> f) a general misunderstanding of the nature and value of so-called

> pests,

> g) poverty and squalid living conditions, and

> h) rain forest destruction.

>

> Factors such as these, and not HIV, must be included as primary

> agents when discussing the cause of AIDS and unique clusters of

> bodily symptoms. As a microscopist, nutritionist, and public health

> educator, I have worked with many HIV-positive individuals who have

> remained free of AIDS symptoms for years. Yet, when treated with

> prescription drugs like AZT, patients have become ill and died from

> a wasting disease in a short time. When this occurs, the cause of

> death is blamed on AIDS. Yet AIDS death and AZT then become

> virtually indistinguishable.

>

> Pharmaceutical companies are heavily involved in the broader

economy

> including the chemical industry which is also responsible for

> pesticide research and manufacture. The incestuous corporate

> relationships among industries extend broadly and the inter-

> connections include the majority of chemical, pharmaceutical, food,

> agriculture, petroleum and international banking companies.

> No " conspiracy theory " is needed here. The relationship among

> industrial despots is not the malevolence of active collusion but

> the evil that stems from the absence of integrity.

>

> Ask yourself. Is there any major industry in America that has not

> seen horrendous front page scandals directly related to problems of

> moral character, grasping materialism, bottom-line obsessions, and

> leadership integrity? Corporate executives do not have to talk to

> each other on the phone. That's dangerous, illegal, and to be

> avoided. Monsanto does not have to call Merck who calls Cargill who

> calls Archer-s-Midland who calls British Petroleum who calls

> the Industrial Commercial Bank of China. That's not how it works.

> They all arise at 5 a.m. to check the same overseas markets while

> still on the morning treadmill and first cup of coffee. They all

> study the same Wall Street Journal, analyze the same markets, track

> the same world trends, and study the same forecasts before they

make

> their same capital-based decisions and send their lobbyists to

> Washington D.C. and the same financial capitols across the world.

>

> All major industries have bought into the values dictated by

obscene

> executive compensation, ruthless world markets and the cut-throat,

> competitive marketplace. It is not as if the HIV/ET apologists and

> protagonists did note have enough self-enriching motivation to

> maintain the economic status quo. Even those individuals who

> understand the nature of bodily health and those who have made a

> commitment to an alkaline lifestyle must continue to live in a

world

> dominated by massive environmental influences which work against

the

> establishment of a correct science leading to a healthy medical and

> personal science of health.

>

> The bottom line is that AIDS toxicity as well as cancer and other

> degenerative symptoms are produced by large amounts of toxins

> (metabolic acids) from many sources in the body along with poor

> nutrition, poor sanitation and prescription and recreational drugs.

> Toxicity is a result of drug abuse, faulty diet, and poisonous

> overgrowth of fungal microorganisms. Fungal organisms are inherent

> in the body. Their purpose is to recycle dead material. This is

done

> by digestion of tissues and further breakdown via acid waste

> products. These microorganisms are kept in check by a balanced

> biochemistry and are present when our internal terrain becomes

> acidic. The problem begins when, prematurely, the organisms receive

> a chemical or biological signal that the host is dead and spring

> into action. Their poisons cause the body to produce the symptoms

of

> what we call disease.

>

> A real-life AIDS Scenario One of the first five AIDS cases in

> history, a 33 year old Los Angeles male, was engaged in a high-risk

> lifestyle. He admitted taking aphrodisiacs used during the 1960s

and

> 70s known as " poppers. "

>

> Poppers are made from animal nitrite, a poisonous mycotoxin (acid).

> Some people are familiar with nitrites used in deli meats which are

> regulated as potential carcinogens. Few nitrites are more toxic

than

> the nitrites in poppers which react violently with almost anything.

>

> Nitrites (nitric acid from animal proteins) and the products into

> which they break down have long been known to scientists for their

> ability to mutate DNA. According to a former nitrite researcher

with

> the United States Centers for Disease Control, dosage from popper

> inhalation is likely to exceed that from eating processed deli meat

> by one million times! In addition, these elements are not

considered

> as critical factors by the so-called scientific community. But

> neither are drug abuse in general, dirty needles, over-the-counter

> and prescription drugs such as antibiotics, alcohol-consumption,

> anti-fungals and other immunosuppressive chemicals, many of which

> are present in the HIV positive population.

>

> Popper use has been associated with an AIDS indicator called

> pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP). PCP is responsible for half

of

> the AIDS mortality rates in North America and Europe. Candidiasis

is

> responsible for another 17%. This means that yeast which is

> primarily a symptom of dis-ease contributes to 67% of all AIDS-

> related deaths in those countries. However, the drug factor

> increases susceptibility to an immune system-destroying " virus, "

> even though no one has ever proved that one actually exists.

>

> In the first recorded AIDS patient, a yeast infestation of the

lungs

> brought on pneumonia and oral thrush. This thick overgrowth of

> candida with their acidic mycotoxins choked the patient to death.

He

> died from an overdose of mycotoxins (acids) rather than the ravages

> of the retrovirus. A Way Home Cellular immunity is not the first

> line of defense against out-fections.

>

> Fallout from the false germ theory has created the confusion of

> symptoms and disease.

>

> Our immune function is our body's (white blood cell) janitorial

> service that keeps the body clean and recycles dead material. In

> neutralizing the acids from germs and outside toxins, this system

> may easily become over-worked or suppressed and is already busy

> enough in a healthy body.

>

> The key is not to stimulate the immune system, but to restore it.

> The first line of defense is an alkaline balanced and nutrified

> system that will prevent biological transformation of body cells to

> bacteria, yeast and finally the mold that create the symptoms we

> call disease.

>

[Guest guest]

Thanks Tigerpaw2 and Who for this info. I've heard about this for some

time but this article by Young puts it all into perspective and

makes it much clearer. We need more people like him speaking out about

HIV and toxins.

--- In , " tigerpaw2c " <tigerpaw2c@...>

wrote:

>

> By O. Young D.Sc., Ph.D

>

> http://articlesofhealth.blogspot.com/2007/05/second-thoughts-about-

> hivaids.html

>

> In the first recorded AIDS patient, a yeast infestation of the lungs

> brought on pneumonia and oral thrush. This thick overgrowth of

> candida with their acidic mycotoxins choked the patient to death. He

> died from an overdose of mycotoxins (acids) rather than the ravages

> of the retrovirus. A Way Home Cellular immunity is not the first

> line of defense against out-fections.

>

[Guest guest]

Thank you, but the reason I put it on the board wasn't necessarily

about HIV/AIDS, but the overgrowth of candida (which many doctors

still refuse to acknowledge) and the acid/akaline levels in our

systems. Many who have had toxic exposure tend to run at an acidic

level, when we really should be more akaline. I also found this

article interesting thinking of a situation we experienced in one of

many of our ER visits. I can remember a situation where I took

Sharon to the ER at 2 am because her one arm was swelled up and was

experiencing a burning sensation. Once Sharon had the ER doctor what

she was diagnosed with he stepped away from her and feared she was

contagious. He never examined her. He stepped across the room,

looked at her and said, " Yep, you have fibro, I'll order some pain

medication, " then he left. The worst part, he got paid for this.

I may not agree with everything Dr.Young has to say, but he does

bring up some interesting points.

KC

--- In , " gsgrl2000 " <gsgrl2000@...>

wrote:

>

> Thanks Tigerpaw2 and Who for this info. I've heard about this for

some

> time but this article by Young puts it all into perspective

and

> makes it much clearer. We need more people like him speaking out

about

> HIV and toxins.

>

>

>

>