Guest guest Posted May 26, 2007 Report Share Posted May 26, 2007 What percentage of injured people actually get to sue? Probably less than 1% Of those cases, what percentage settle for much less than the actual loss, a very high percentage, perhaps almost 100% So the ACTUAL economic loss to the victims from mold illness must be ASTRONOMICAL.. And that is just the classic mold illnesses that we acknowledge.. The economic loss to people by the large number of other diseases caused OR EXCERBATED because of indoor mold is also probably much higher.. Those are all broken lives, relationships, homes, careers, futures.. All AVOIDABLE.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 26, 2007 Report Share Posted May 26, 2007 Yup. yup. yup. yup. We're small but mighty on the other side and we WILL overcome. We are making progress. ~Haley LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote: What percentage of injured people actually get to sue? Probably less than 1% Of those cases, what percentage settle for much less than the actual loss, a very high percentage, perhaps almost 100% So the ACTUAL economic loss to the victims from mold illness must be ASTRONOMICAL.. And that is just the classic mold illnesses that we acknowledge.. The economic loss to people by the large number of other diseases caused OR EXCERBATED because of indoor mold is also probably much higher.. Those are all broken lives, relationships, homes, careers, futures.. All AVOIDABLE.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2007 Report Share Posted May 27, 2007 In a message dated 5/26/2007 6:38:19 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, quackadillian@... writes: So the ACTUAL economic loss to the victims from mold illness must be ASTRONOMICAL.A And that is just the classic mold illnesses that we acknowledge.And t economic loss to people by the large number of other diseases caused OR EXCERBATED because of indoor mold is also probably much higher.. Those are all broken lives, relationships, homes, careers, futures.. All AVOIDABLE.. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Quackadillian, I was thinking along the same lines. If it is 3.5 billion from asthma brought on by damp indoor buildings, what dollar amount is missing from that number? I would be inclined to believe it is far greater. What about workers comp, disability, foreclosures, building materials, litigation, useless medicine, secondary hosp. infections, irritant and toxic illness, increased school and public maintenance costs, etc. crop production and farm animals, zoos, etc. I would be inclined to believe that the 3.5 is actually just the tiney tip of the iceberg of costs over this issue. ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2007 Report Share Posted May 27, 2007 Many years ago I read an essay in a book entitled " The Politics of Law " that went into a long analysis of personal injury lawsuits and the dynamics of claims and how the system worked to basically deny justice to so many more than it gives any form of justice to. It basically said that for the system to actually work everybody who was inured needed to sue, and that society should make it easy for them, because that was an essential part of the deterrence system - we are on an honor system that depends on people to sue to deter abuse of that honor system. I'm going to try to locate a used copy of it, because it was very, very good in describing just how skewed and broken the system is. And not in the way the 'tort reform' people say either. The opposite way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.