Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 " Whether looking at Canada's privately-run, provincially paid for health care systems, or England's National Health Service, or France's social democracy, or Cuba's impoverished egalitarianism, finds the universal thread that makes their social systems more successful than ours. " They live in a world of we, not me, " he says near the end of the film. " We'll never fix anything until we get that one thing right. " June 26, 2007 I [Merrill Gooner] snuck into a sneak preview of 's new film this week. Here's a sneak review Sicko About two-thirds of the way through " Sicko, " takes us to France, where health care is free, doctors make housecalls, daycare is cheap, and vacations are long. A group of American ex-patriots, sitting around a cafe table, extol the wonders of their adopted, family-friendly environment. " Is there a reason the government wanted us to hate the French, " ponders. " It was enough to make me put away my Freedom Fries. " A few scenes later, we're back in the U.S. watching the largest hospital in Los Angeles dump an indigent, mentally confused patient on the doorstep of homeless shelter because she didn't have money or insurance. " Who are we, " the filmmaker asks in his omniscient narrator's voice. " Is this what we've become? A country that dumps its citizens on the sidewalk because they can't pay their hospital bills? " The national discussion provoked by the film will inevitably focus on the gross failures and inequities of the U.S. health insurance system, as it should. And like most people who know too much about that system, I could complain for hours about the inaccuracies, unfair comparisons, agit-prop stunts and questionable political judgments that went into the making of " Sicko. " You'll read plenty such comments in the mainstream media when the reviewers get their hands on the film this weekend, and you may have a few of those thoughts yourself when you go see it. But they pale by comparison to the larger point that makes over and over again in this heartrending, brilliant and occasionally very funny film. Our patchwork private health insurance system is a tragedy for those whom it fails. But its failures are really just a metaphor for what a growing proportion of Americans recognize is wrong with this country. Whether looking at Canada's privately-run, provincially paid for health care systems, or England's National Health Service, or France's social democracy, or Cuba's impoverished egalitarianism, finds the universal thread that makes their social systems more successful than ours. " They live in a world of we, not me, " he says near the end of the film. " We'll never fix anything until we get that one thing right. " The film is filled with heartrending stories of people who couldn't afford or were denied care, usually by profit-maximizing insurance companies. And that is ultimately what keeps us glued to the screen. Indeed, the real people whose stories tells triumph over the questionable settings in which he put some of them (I'm thinking here of the highly publicized stunt of taking ill and injured 9/11 rescue workers who can't afford needed medical treatments on boats to Guantanamo Bay to demand health care as good as the detainees ostensibly get). But is individual misfortune enough to sway a political debate that will be dominated by people with their own well-financed megaphones and a compliant media willing to spread their distortions? Already is being attacked for promoting socialized medicine, even though neither Canada nor France directly employ most of their physicians. But that's the point with 's work. As with most of his films, has succeeded in putting himself at the center of a major political debate. So what if there are enough mistakes to give the insurance industry, the drug companies, and their spokespersons plenty of ammunition. It's controversial! It's fun! And it's made a rich man. A few weeks ago, I watched Bill Mahar interview on HBO. said his only goal was to get people asking why we're the only industrialized country in the world that doesn't have universal health insurance coverage. Mahar enthused that he thought the political reaction to the film would push the movement for universal coverage " over the edge. " Even though I wholeheartedly agree with the film's overarching message, it's going to take a lot more than agit-prop to push this movement over the top. Posted by gooznews at June 26, 2007 10:59 PM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ GoozNews June 28, 2007 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- The Coming Age of Unwellness -- Sicko ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.