Guest guest Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Jane, You asked " does anyone know the acceptable levels of mold counts within a house? " The answer is that no such magic number exists. This is because: Mould growth can influence air quality because both spores and mycelial fragments are dispersed into the air and can be inhaled. Their penetration into the bronchial tree depends on their size. The smaller particles penetrate deeper into the lungs. Three features of mould biochemistry are of special interest in terms of human health: Mould cell walls contain (1->3)-ß-D-glucan, a compound with inflammatory properties; Mould spores and mycelial fragments contain allergens; and The spores of some species contain low molecular weight chemicals that are cytotoxic or have other toxic properties (e.g. satratoxins and atranones produced by Stachybotrys chartarum). Health effects Health Canada has carried out two reviews of the scientific literature pertaining to the health effects of indoor moulds (Health Canada 1995; 2004). The Institut national de santé publique du Québec also published a review on this subject (d'Halewyn et al. 2003). The following conclusions were drawn: Exposure to indoor mould is associated with an increased prevalence of asthma-related symptoms such as chronic wheezing, irritation symptoms, and non-specific symptoms; and In laboratory animal studies, instillation of fungal antigens (Penicillium sp. and Aspergillus sp.) and fungal cell components [(1->3)-ß-D-glucan] resulted in an inflammatory response in the lungs of rodents, while instillation of Stachbotrys chartarum spores resulted in severe histological and biochemical changes. These conclusions have been supported by more recent findings. In two cohort studies (Wickman et al. 2003; Jaakkola et al. 2005), significant associations were found between home dampness and the risk of developing asthma. In experimental studies, asthma-like responses were observed in mice following exposure to a typical building-associated fungus, Penicillium chrysogenum (Chung et al. 2005), and inflammatory responses were seen in rats exposed to low doses of toxins from the same species (Rand et al. 2005).... Health Canada considers that mould growth in residential buildings may pose a health hazard. Health risks depend on exposure and, for asthma symptoms, on allergic sensitization. However, the large number of mould species and strains growing in buildings and the large inter-individual variability in human response to mould exposure preclude the derivation of exposure limits. " In other words, there are too many variables from simultaneous exposure to microbial contaminants found within water damaged buildings, and too many variables from person to person's immune systems as to how they will react to exposure to ever set a permissible exposure limit from linear extrapolations of one mold at a time. If you have mold and you are exhibiting symptoms of illness most likely indicative from mold exposure, you have two choices: 1. remove the mold from the building or 2. remove yourself from the building. Sharon ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 dearest sharon ihave stayed in an old house for far too long and it has killed my lungs. i can stay at a safe enviornmental hotel but thet are painting all around it, i have no good answer. snk1955@... wrote: Jane, You asked " does anyone know the acceptable levels of mold counts within a house? " The answer is that no such magic number exists. This is because: Mould growth can influence air quality because both spores and mycelial fragments are dispersed into the air and can be inhaled. Their penetration into the bronchial tree depends on their size. The smaller particles penetrate deeper into the lungs. Three features of mould biochemistry are of special interest in terms of human health: Mould cell walls contain (1->3)-ß-D-glucan, a compound with inflammatory properties; Mould spores and mycelial fragments contain allergens; and The spores of some species contain low molecular weight chemicals that are cytotoxic or have other toxic properties (e.g. satratoxins and atranones produced by Stachybotrys chartarum). Health effects Health Canada has carried out two reviews of the scientific literature pertaining to the health effects of indoor moulds (Health Canada 1995; 2004). The Institut national de santé publique du Québec also published a review on this subject (d'Halewyn et al. 2003). The following conclusions were drawn: Exposure to indoor mould is associated with an increased prevalence of asthma-related symptoms such as chronic wheezing, irritation symptoms, and non-specific symptoms; and In laboratory animal studies, instillation of fungal antigens (Penicillium sp. and Aspergillus sp.) and fungal cell components [(1->3)-ß-D-glucan] resulted in an inflammatory response in the lungs of rodents, while instillation of Stachbotrys chartarum spores resulted in severe histological and biochemical changes. These conclusions have been supported by more recent findings. In two cohort studies (Wickman et al. 2003; Jaakkola et al. 2005), significant associations were found between home dampness and the risk of developing asthma. In experimental studies, asthma-like responses were observed in mice following exposure to a typical building-associated fungus, Penicillium chrysogenum (Chung et al. 2005), and inflammatory responses were seen in rats exposed to low doses of toxins from the same species (Rand et al. 2005).... Health Canada considers that mould growth in residential buildings may pose a health hazard. Health risks depend on exposure and, for asthma symptoms, on allergic sensitization. However, the large number of mould species and strains growing in buildings and the large inter-individual variability in human response to mould exposure preclude the derivation of exposure limits. " In other words, there are too many variables from simultaneous exposure to microbial contaminants found within water damaged buildings, and too many variables from person to person's immune systems as to how they will react to exposure to ever set a permissible exposure limit from linear extrapolations of one mold at a time. If you have mold and you are exhibiting symptoms of illness most likely indicative from mold exposure, you have two choices: 1. remove the mold from the building or 2. remove yourself from the building. Sharon ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Sharon, Excellent response! There are many other reasons but her's is the most succint right now now. Good work. Jane, I, along with all the others, wish their was a magic bullet cure and a magic bullet test. But there isn't. So, for a little clarity and expansion of Sharon's comments: 1. Testing for mold is like testing for animals or plants, each is an entire Kingdom of life composed of millions of different types. High levels of either one or may not be a " problem. " Compare kittens with lions or snakes or mosquitos. 2. We don't actually test for mold. We test for mold spores, only one of an increasing number of component parts responsible for health effects. This is like deciding safety to drive through a forest of trees by looking only for their seeds. Dumb and deadly. 3. As Sharon points out so well, each of us reacts differently to different molds in different ways. There is no clear exposure levels that apply to most of the population. We can't control the world for your specific needs and mine and everyone elses because there are too many differences and they contradict each other. One man's poison may be another man's cure. Heatlh Canada has the right idea: People shouldn't live in moldy houses. If it is there, remove it. Then keep it clean and dry. As for those of us severely affected by mold growth, some of the screening tests such as Barb1283 describes may provide a few of the necessary pieces of information. But none are definitive and each set is specific to that person. Barb, for example, has spent untold time dollars developing her own baseline, which may or may not work for you. Finally, not all problems are mold, as some on this group can attest. If mold is the only focus, time and scarce money is thrown away. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC > Jane, > > You asked " does anyone know the acceptable levels of mold counts within a > house? " > > > The answer is that no such magic number exists. This is because: > > > > Mould growth can influence air quality because both spores and mycelial > fragments are dispersed into the air and can be inhaled. Their penetration into > the bronchial tree depends on their size. The smaller particles penetrate > deeper into the lungs. > > Three features of mould biochemistry are of special interest in terms of > human health: > Mould cell walls contain (1->3)-ß-D-glucan, a compound with inflammatory > properties; > Mould spores and mycelial fragments contain allergens; and > The spores of some species contain low molecular weight chemicals that are > cytotoxic or have other toxic properties (e.g. satratoxins and atranones > produced by Stachybotrys chartarum). > Health effects > Health Canada has carried out two reviews of the scientific literature > pertaining to the health effects of indoor moulds (Health Canada 1995; 2004). The > Institut national de santé publique du Québec also published a review on this > subject (d'Halewyn et al. 2003). The following conclusions were drawn: > Exposure to indoor mould is associated with an increased prevalence of > asthma-related symptoms such as chronic wheezing, irritation symptoms, and > non-specific symptoms; and > In laboratory animal studies, instillation of fungal antigens (Penicillium > sp. and Aspergillus sp.) and fungal cell components [(1->3)-ß-D-glucan] > resulted in an inflammatory response in the lungs of rodents, while instillation of > Stachbotrys chartarum spores resulted in severe histological and biochemical > changes. > These conclusions have been supported by more recent findings. In two cohort > studies (Wickman et al. 2003; Jaakkola et al. 2005), significant associations > were found between home dampness and the risk of developing asthma. In > experimental studies, asthma-like responses were observed in mice following > exposure to a typical building-associated fungus, Penicillium chrysogenum (Chung > et al. 2005), and inflammatory responses were seen in rats exposed to low doses > of toxins from the same species (Rand et al. 2005).... > Health Canada considers that mould growth in residential buildings may pose a > health hazard. Health risks depend on exposure and, for asthma symptoms, on > allergic sensitization. However, the large number of mould species and > strains growing in buildings and the large inter-individual variability in human > response to mould exposure preclude the derivation of exposure limits. " > In other words, there are too many variables from simultaneous exposure to > microbial contaminants found within water damaged buildings, and too many > variables from person to person's immune systems as to how they will react to > exposure to ever set a permissible exposure limit from linear extrapolations of > one mold at a time. > If you have mold and you are exhibiting symptoms of illness most likely > indicative from mold exposure, you have two choices: > 1. remove the mold from the building > or > 2. remove yourself from the building. > Sharon > > > > ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 In a message dated 5/19/2007 3:10:35 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, janeannmosher@... writes: dearest sharon ihave stayed in an old house for far too long and it has killed my lungs. i can stay at a safe enviornmental hotel but thet are painting all around it, i have no good answer. I think you have just provided a VERY good answer for others by recognizing that you " stayed too long " . Those are wise words of which others should take heed and learn from your experience. Sharon ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 I am truly amazed with the wealth of knowledge this group has and feel very fortunate to have found it. Thank you!! a " Carl E. Grimes " <grimes@...> wrote: Sharon, Excellent response! There are many other reasons but her's is the most succinct right now now. Good work. Jane, I, along with all the others, wish their was a magic bullet cure and a magic bullet test. But there isn't. So, for a little clarity and expansion of Sharon's comments: 1. Testing for mold is like testing for animals or plants, each is an entire Kingdom of life composed of millions of different types. High levels of either one or may not be a " problem. " Compare kittens with lions or snakes or mosquito's. 2. We don't actually test for mold. We test for mold spores, only one of an increasing number of component parts responsible for health effects. This is like deciding safety to drive through a forest of trees by looking only for their seeds. Dumb and deadly. 3. As Sharon points out so well, each of us reacts differently to different molds in different ways. There is no clear exposure levels that apply to most of the population. We can't control the world for your specific needs and mine and everyone elses because there are too many differences and they contradict each other. One man's poison may be another man's cure. Heatlh Canada has the right idea: People shouldn't live in moldy houses. If it is there, remove it. Then keep it clean and dry. As for those of us severely affected by mold growth, some of the screening tests such as Barb1283 describes may provide a few of the necessary pieces of information. But none are definitive and each set is specific to that person. Barb, for example, has spent untold time dollars developing her own baseline, which may or may not work for you. Finally, not all problems are mold, as some on this group can attest. If mold is the only focus, time and scarce money is thrown away. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC > Jane, > > You asked " does anyone know the acceptable levels of mold counts within a > house? " > > > The answer is that no such magic number exists. This is because: > > > > Mould growth can influence air quality because both spores and mycelial > fragments are dispersed into the air and can be inhaled. Their penetration into > the bronchial tree depends on their size. The smaller particles penetrate > deeper into the lungs. > > Three features of mould biochemistry are of special interest in terms of > human health: > Mould cell walls contain (1->3)-ß-D-glucan, a compound with inflammatory > properties; > Mould spores and mycelial fragments contain allergens; and > The spores of some species contain low molecular weight chemicals that are > cytotoxic or have other toxic properties (e.g. satratoxins and atranones > produced by Stachybotrys chartarum). > Health effects > Health Canada has carried out two reviews of the scientific literature > pertaining to the health effects of indoor moulds (Health Canada 1995; 2004). The > Institut national de santé publique du Québec also published a review on this > subject (d'Halewyn et al. 2003). The following conclusions were drawn: > Exposure to indoor mould is associated with an increased prevalence of > asthma-related symptoms such as chronic wheezing, irritation symptoms, and > non-specific symptoms; and > In laboratory animal studies, instillation of fungal antigens (Penicillium > sp. and Aspergillus sp.) and fungal cell components [(1->3)-ß-D-glucan] > resulted in an inflammatory response in the lungs of rodents, while instillation of > Stachbotrys chartarum spores resulted in severe histological and biochemical > changes. > These conclusions have been supported by more recent findings. In two cohort > studies (Wickman et al. 2003; Jaakkola et al. 2005), significant associations > were found between home dampness and the risk of developing asthma. In > experimental studies, asthma-like responses were observed in mice following > exposure to a typical building-associated fungus, Penicillium chrysogenum (Chung > et al. 2005), and inflammatory responses were seen in rats exposed to low doses > of toxins from the same species (Rand et al. 2005).... > Health Canada considers that mould growth in residential buildings may pose a > health hazard. Health risks depend on exposure and, for asthma symptoms, on > allergic sensitization. However, the large number of mould species and > strains growing in buildings and the large inter-individual variability in human > response to mould exposure preclude the derivation of exposure limits. " > In other words, there are too many variables from simultaneous exposure to > microbial contaminants found within water damaged buildings, and too many > variables from person to person's immune systems as to how they will react to > exposure to ever set a permissible exposure limit from linear extrapolations of > one mold at a time. > If you have mold and you are exhibiting symptoms of illness most likely > indicative from mold exposure, you have two choices: > 1. remove the mold from the building > or > 2. remove yourself from the building. > Sharon > > > > ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2007 Report Share Posted May 20, 2007 Jane (or is it Janean?), It is never too late to get out! Please do not give up. You owe it to yourself to spend time away from your belongings and environment to see the difference. With all that is available for temporary housing you can be out of your house today. Then when you begin to feel better and the brain fog lifts you will be able to do the next indicated step. Everyone of us that I know of, no matter how long we were exposed, or how sick we became, began to feel better once out of the unhealthy environment. Instead of a hotel (which can be the more expensive alternative) you might want to consider corporate housing, or what is called short stay rentals or extended stays. These are less expensive than traditional hotels and have daily or monthly rates. The extended stay is like a hotel though less expensive with a kitchenette. Look for one where the windows open. Short stays or corporate housing are often apartment complexes that have furnished units available with everything you need including a fully equipped kitchen. Health wise I have had better luck with corporate housing since as apartments they do not have the circulated air of extended stays. A search online for your area will help you with this. These temporary dwellings are usually more than familiar with us, since more and more of us have had to turn to these places for shelter. Be sure to let them know that you have a sensitivity to mold and they will work with you. Bobbins, RN, L.Ac, QME In a message dated 5/20/2007 6:45:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time, janeannmosher@... writes: i stayed too long . i cough up blood, had i gotten out two years ago i might not have sufferred so. but my doctors poo poohed mold and now i am too ill to leave. my advice to one and all get out before you develop bronchiactesis and ahost of other things. god bless each of you pn your journeys. my love to all. In a message dated 5/19/2007 3:10:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time, janeannmosher@... writes: dearest sharon ihave stayed in an old house for far too long and it has killed my lungs. i can stay at a safe enviornmental hotel but thet are painting all around it, i have no good answer. _snk1955@..._ (mailto:snk1955@...) wrote: Jane, You asked " does anyone know the acceptable levels of mold counts within a house? " The answer is that no such magic number exists. This is because: Mould growth can influence air quality because both spores and mycelial fragments are dispersed into the air and can be inhaled. Their penetration into the bronchial tree depends on their size. The smaller particles penetrate deeper into the lungs. Three features of mould biochemistry are of special interest in terms of human health: Mould cell walls contain (1->3)-ß-D-glucan, a compound with inflammatory properties; Mould spores and mycelial fragments contain allergens; and The spores of some species contain low molecular weight chemicals that are cytotoxic or have other toxic properties (e.g. satratoxins and atranones produced by Stachybotrys chartarum). Health effects Health Canada has carried out two reviews of the scientific literature pertaining to the health effects of indoor moulds (Health Canada 1995; 2004). The Institut national de santé publique du Québec also published a review on this subject (d'Halewyn et al. 2003). The following conclusions were drawn: Exposure to indoor mould is associated with an increased prevalence of asthma-related symptoms such as chronic wheezing, irritation symptoms, and non-specific symptoms; and In laboratory animal studies, instillation of fungal antigens (Penicillium sp. and Aspergillus sp.) and fungal cell components [(1->3)-ß-D-glucan] resulted in an inflammatory response in the lungs of rodents, while instillation of Stachbotrys chartarum spores resulted in severe histological and biochemical changes. These conclusions have been supported by more recent findings. In two cohort studies (Wickman et al. 2003; Jaakkola et al. 2005), significant associations were found between home dampness and the risk of developing asthma. In experimental studies, asthma-like responses were observed in mice following exposure to a typical building-associated fungus, Penicillium chrysogenum (Chung et al. 2005), and inflammatory responses were seen in rats exposed to low doses of toxins from the same species (Rand et al. 2005).... Health Canada considers that mould growth in residential buildings may pose a health hazard. Health risks depend on exposure and, for asthma symptoms, on allergic sensitization. However, the large number of mould species and strains growing in buildings and the large inter-individual variability in human response to mould exposure preclude the derivation of exposure limits. " In other words, there are too many variables from simultaneous exposure to microbial contaminants found within water damaged buildings, and too many variables from person to person's immune systems as to how they will react to exposure to ever set a permissible exposure limit from linear extrapolations of one mold at a time. If you have mold and you are exhibiting symptoms of illness most likely indicative from mold exposure, you have two choices: 1. remove the mold from the building or 2. remove yourself from the building. Sharon ******************************************<WBR>*********<WBR>*_http://www.aol. http_ (http://www.aol.com./) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] --------------------------------- ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.