Guest guest Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 It's when you suspect or > should have suspected " mold " was making you sick. and exactly how are you suppose to suspect mold is makeing you sick when it in a low dose situation and theres no smell and you can't see it growing behind your walls or even under the house or in your airducts or ac unit, and you've never heard of mold makeing someone sick because the science wasn't there, and even if it was you have to have a clue that that could be what is makeing you ill. than top it off with oh so much denial and bogus rat studies, doctors misdiagnoseing your symptims ect.ect. you can bet that if a lawyer had family members ill from it and they never had a clue he'd be fighting to get this changed. because of all the blaaa,blaaa,blaaa crap going on with the whole issue it shouldn't start until you've had proper diagnoses of illness. even if you've had testing done in the environment theres no dose set that can say you will be sick from this amount so really how can you know untell your properly diagnosed? now if there was a date when it was splashed all over the news that mold can and does make you ill and molds that produce mycotoxins poison you, I guess I missed it. if our goverment gave a crap about us they would declare this as the natural and national disaster that it is and get us emergency medical diagnoses and treatment and support us like they do in other natural disasters and to make up for the denial by the insurance industries and certain medical science that have went out of their way to denie this illness is real. I think the time has become way over due for admittance by the medical/science/insurance/industry/goverment to make a public statement saying thier sorry, they missed up BIG TIME by not furthering science on fungi after the discovery of antibiotics and make a promise to america that they will do everything in their power to help save the peoples health and our beautiful country. I guess saveing the Irac oil is more important than saveing the people of the USA. PEOPLE HAVE GIVEN THEIR LIVES TO DEFEND OUR GREAT COUNTRY ISN'T IT THE GOVERMENTS JOB TO PROTECT THE PEOPLE? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 That isn't true. I have had several discussions with lawyers and when pressed, they agreed that the essence of a staute of limitations is winnability. Any statute of limitations can only start running when you could actually begin to sue AND WIN. Otherwise, there would be a powerful incentive to hide and destroy evidence. Otherwise, many injured people would NEVER be able to sue. That would defeat the whole purpose of the concept of the staute of limitations (encouraging people to sue as soon as they could) and turn it into a bar to justice, which would then result in NO statutes of limitations having started. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 How many people is this group have had to contacts lawyers? a LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote: That isn't true. I have had several discussions with lawyers and when pressed, they agreed that the essence of a staute of limitations is winnability. Any statute of limitations can only start running when you could actually begin to sue AND WIN. Otherwise, there would be a powerful incentive to hide and destroy evidence. Otherwise, many injured people would NEVER be able to sue. That would defeat the whole purpose of the concept of the staute of limitations (encouraging people to sue as soon as they could) and turn it into a bar to justice, which would then result in NO statutes of limitations having started. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.