St. 's fumigation experiment

[Guest guest]

I'm concerned about the use of chlorine dioxide gas to experiment (in

the words of a CA gov't official) on a large, vital CA hospital, to

remove mold by a very controversial and questionable, corrosive, and

seemingly dangerous method, by Giuliani's company, with EPA consent.

If they are using this on hospitals it is only a matter of time before

schools and other buildings may be experimented on with the EPA consent.

Giuliani's Partners and Bio One.seem to be using a very questionable

method to fight mold, one that is considered by some scientists to be

dangerous and ineffective.

From what I understand Dr. Strauss was interviewed by the Ventura

County Star and seemingly they refused to print his assessment of this

process.

This is an important article:

http://vcreporter.com/article.php?id=4853 & IssueNum=130

The research seems to reflect that this does not work to completely

rid a building of mold, nor does it remove the toxins, right? Rudy G's

company, it seems, is using a CA hospital and thus, the American

public in Ventura County, to experiment on, with a method that is

called controversial, ineffective, and possibly dangerous, sanctioned

by our CA and USA gov't. This is worrisome to me.

Will he be permitted to continue to experiment on vital hospitals for

profit, using a method unproven in the lab and real world? The EPA

seems to be allowing him to justify it, using his own research and

letting him experiment on a vital hospital. Is there something wrong

with that picture?

In researching the use of chlorine dioxide gas as a fumigant, we

have not yet seen any research that would indicate it removes toxins

or should be used as an alternative to removal of contaminated or

wetted building materials. Is anyone else concerned?