Guest guest Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 DIA mold suit dismissed Denver Post - Denver,CO By Pankratz Denver Post Staff Writer Article Last Updated: 06/25/2007 03:40:23 PM MDT http://test.denverpost.com/news/ci_6225646 The roof of the main terminal building at Denver International Airport, photographed in 2005. (Jerry Cleveland | The Denver Post)A class-action lawsuit that alleges travelers and employees at Denver International Airport were exposed to extensive mold and fungi contamination was dismissed today by the Colorado Supreme Court. The high court said the women who brought the lawsuit failed to file their notice of a claim with Denver within the 180-day time limit required under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act. Also, the justices said the women didn't identify any injuries suffered during the 180-day period. The action was filed by two United Airlines employees, Terri Crandall and Joann Hubbard, who claimed they experienced pneumonia, headaches, nausea, shortness of breath and bronchitis beginning in 1995. By 1999, Crandall and Hubbard each believed their illnesses were being caused by environmental contamination at the airport. Fognani, the lawyer representing Crandall and Hubbard, said he and his clients " were extremely disappointed " with the decision and would have to review the opinion and decide what course to pursue. " I read that Denver plans to spend $6.2 million to renovate DIA bathrooms but won't spend one-sixth of that to determine what needs to be done to protect DIA workers. That is a travesty, " Fognani said. " They need to do a full-blown environmental investigation and then undertake a responsive cleanup. " Doering, an assistant Denver city attorney, said the city was pleased with the decision and that Denver has not found any " systemic " problems at the airport. He said that there are occasional problems, such as odor complaints, and those are investigated and remedied immediately. He also said some remedial work was done on some abandoned training rooms in the basement of Concourse B in early 2006, where there may have been some water seepage. " We don't feel there is an ongoing, systemic environmental problem, " Doering said. Crandall and Hubbard, who were employed at DIA as customer-service representatives, claimed that during the periods they were being treated for their medical conditions and were away from Concourse B, their symptoms disappeared. But their symptoms returned when they went back to work on Concourse B, they said. Crandall has continued her employment at DIA, but Hubbard left in February 2002. Both worked primarily at the boarding gates in Concourse B of DIA and also in the " Red Carpet Club " rooms of Concourse B. Hubbard stopped working after she suffered what she called " a final blowout, " in which she had a skin outbreak so severe that she had to leave work and seek medical attention, according to court documents. Staff writer Pankratz can be reached at hpankratz@.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.