Guest guest Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 Housing Board Blasts Inspections Tampa Tribune - Tampa,FL By JOHN W. ALLMAN The Tampa Tribune http://www.tbo.com/news/metro/MGBM00TVG2F.html TAMPA - The Tampa Housing Authority, seeking more accountability at River Pines Apartments, has asked for a revamped inspection process and better description of problems such as mold. The strongly-worded request, written by Jerome s, housing president, to Rath Harper and Associates on Thursday, is an about- face from May 22 - the day s and the authority's board of commissioners received a 59-page report from the company about the senior retirement community. At that time, s - despite not having read the report - said he was " satisfied " and " very comfortable " with explanations offered by Fred Rath, president of Rath Harper, about complaints reported in The Tampa Tribune. Dozens of residents have complained, claiming, among other things, poor living conditions, including mold in their units, and rude and intimidating treatment by management staff. Rath's firm contracts with the authority to manage day-to-day operations at three properties owned by the authority: River Pines, River Place Apartments and Meridian Apartments. The firm receives 4 percent of total rent collected at each. Rath's report included 25 pages showing the results of inspections at 300 River Pines units. In all, 144 units were listed as needing repair, including 40 units with " early indication " of mold and mildew. Specific details as to severity or scope, however, were minimal. The report included descriptions such as " mildew bath closet " or " mildew in kit, " meaning kitchen. The mold appeared to get s' attention. He and Rath have previously said mold is to be expected at River Pines, which sits off 40th Street in northeast Tampa along the Hillsborough River and is built of concrete block. Before moving in, residents must sign a lease addendum that says they are responsible for cleaning mold as it appears. They are asked to report it to management only after repeated attempts to remove it themselves. " With specific regard to issues of mold, although the issues do not currently appear to be extensive or rampant and seem to stem mostly from inadequate housekeeping, your inspection sheets do not adequately reflect that, " s wrote. " Simply listing 'mold' doesn't give me, or the board, the proper context of the situation, minor or otherwise. " In addition, s criticized " other key components " he said were " omitted " from the report but did not elaborate. He attached copies of inspection checklists used by the authority and the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development, and he asked Rath to create a new inspection form for use at the three properties. The housing authority's checklist, in particular, includes categories for citing mold or mildew and documenting its severity. " I would like to review and approve your new inspection form, " s wrote. s' letter said that he wants housing staff to increase their presence at the three properties. And he said they will periodically select units for inspection " to ensure that your practices are sufficient to determine needs and maintain the properties to a standard acceptable to the authority. " s was unavailable for comment Friday, but Rath issued a statement after receiving the letter. " We are happy to change our inspection reports to give a clearer description of the nature of the housekeeping or maintenance issues, " he said. " Our staff will evaluate the checklists provided and develop a draft for the authority's review. Once approved, we will begin using the new forms immediately. " Rath is slated to appear at the authority's board meeting this month. Last week, a spokeswoman for his company said that repairs to the 144 units have begun, with 20 units completed so far. The work is expected to be done within six weeks, which is considerably shorter than the six-month timetable Rath offered the housing board in his report. At the May 22 meeting, five board members who heard Rath's presentation had not had a chance to read his report. Still, two board members - chairwoman Hazel Harvey and housing resident representative Peoples - downplayed the complaints. Board member Gerald White, however, expressed concern and requested an independent inspection of the property. He did not make his request as a motion, however, and it was not voted upon or discussed. White took a softer stance last week, saying that he wanted to give s a chance to address concerns. " I'm trying not to jump the gun, " he said. " I am concerned; how did we get to this point in the first place? That's the real issue. " Reporter W. Allman can be reached at (813) 259-7915 or jallman@.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.