Guest guest Posted September 9, 2005 Report Share Posted September 9, 2005 Klein wrote: > a C. MacNeil wrote: > > > I have MS Streets and Trips on my PC, used it once. I can't say > > whether the Mac has an equivalent or not, but I can't see why not, > > it has many other apps that do a plethora of different things. > > I prefer not to use MS apps... the only thing MS I really want to use > is the operating system. However, after having purchased DeLorme's > Street Atlas USA 2005 and 2006, and seeing how inaccurate the maps > can be, I bit the bullet and bought the MS product. > > DeLorme's product has many more features, has a much, much better UI, > and is not sold by MS... but I use them with my USB GPS receiver, > and when I am GPS tracking, the most important thing is accuracy. > With DeLorme's product, the actual GPS fix is several hundred feet That should read " sometimes several hundred feet... " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2005 Report Share Posted September 9, 2005 > > But any modern mouse works on the latest Macs, have for > > awhile, so yes, you can have a right clicker, a scroll wheel, or > > that extra side button that my PC's mouse has. Apple now are touting > > their " Mighty Mouse " - I haven't decided yet if I want > > one. > > But do mice with more than one button have the OS functionality (like a > context menu)? Yep, the scroll wheel and right mouse button work without a hitch on any standard USB mouse, without even having to install any extra drivers. -- Cody B. / " codeman38 " cody@... http://www.zone38.net/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2005 Report Share Posted September 9, 2005 > Well, those two are the leading choices for PCs. I do not know what > offerings there may be for the Mac. With the PC, I can pick and > choose > (I can pick one if I like the features and UI, or the other if I need > maximum accuracy). The question is about which product best suits my > needs, not whether I can get something that does the task at all. What I use a computer for is Web design, graphic work, video editing, e-mail, surfing, playing the occasional " old school " game and writing (when I get the time). I also use it to organize my life, such as through iCal, which I very much appreciate. GarageBand, which came with the Mac, is the coolest little music studio I've ever come across. So in the end, the Mac has everything I need, and no, I do not have to settle for anything " less than " . Web design apps, graphic apps - all major software is available on both platforms. When I want a map, I generally use the Web. I don't travel much (except in my home province which I know quite well) so I'm not in dire need of map software ever. As to my PC, the software I use are SoundForge for sound editing and Roxio for recording my old LPs and tapes. I use it for back up purposes, to test websites, and to play some games. If my PC has something already on it that works for me (such as SoundForge and Roxio), I don't bother searching for a Mac equivalent, I just keep using what I'm used to or what's worked so far. Both SoundForge and Roxio are commercial apps, and it would be a waste of money to replace them, or search for a Mac equivalent. But I've seen some rather interesting sound editing apps for the Mac, and in this way, Macs are on par with PCs (with regards to software availability). I just assume stick with what I have on the PC in this regard. My iMac (G4) and PC (Compaq/AMD-Athlon) are both desktops that sit right next to each other. I operate the PC mouse with my left hand and the Mac's with my right. (When I totally shattered my right wrist two years ago, I became quite good with my left hand.) Both keyboards are wireless so I switch as I need them. So, while I'm on my Mac most of the time (about 90% of the time, give or take), I have convenient access to a Windows' PC. I'm quite happy with my set up and with my software choices, both for the Mac and the PC. As to the MAC interface, I like the old " bubble " look, and I'm not real crazy about the " metal " look. But since the Mac interface is minimal (menu bar at the top), and most 3rd party apps still use the " bubble " look, the " metal " look is rarely noticed, except when I open certain native apps. But speaking of which, MS just updated MSN messenger for the Mac and they gave it the metal look, which is most definitely not an improvement. (Although they finally added some features that I've been wanting.) I can live with that though. I dislike the XP look as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2005 Report Share Posted September 9, 2005 > > > > But any modern mouse works on the latest Macs, have for > > > awhile, so yes, you can have a right clicker, a scroll wheel, or > > > that extra side button that my PC's mouse has. Apple now are > touting > > > their " Mighty Mouse " - I haven't decided yet if I want > > > one. > > > > But do mice with more than one button have the OS functionality > (like a > > context menu)? > > Yep, the scroll wheel and right mouse button work without a hitch on > any standard USB mouse, without even having to install any extra > drivers. There is context menus on the Mac, yes. And if all you have is the single clicker mouse that Apple sends with a new Mac, it's just a matter of control+click to get the contextual menu. I'm become partial to keyboard commands (particularly on the Mac which came about due to the simple mouse) so maybe that's why I'm content with the mouse that came with the Mac. But in the end, there's a choice regarding what mice I can use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.