Guest guest Posted July 12, 2007 Report Share Posted July 12, 2007 saecoidosis is a idiopathic multi-system disorder possible precopotating factors: emvironmental chemicals,virises,bacteria,molds and certain industrail dusts. > > http://www1.va.gov/environagents/docs/IL-10-2007-001_Sarcoid.pdf > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2007 Report Share Posted July 12, 2007 Hmm... many of us have an exposure to trichothecene mycotoxins (stachybotrys, fusarium), right? (at least I do) Trichothecenes can cause primary bilary cirrohsis - so evidently they can (via that) cause sarcoid-like granulomas that need to be ruled out via tests. I am pretty sure I have also read that they can directly cause these weird granulomas.. We have people on this list who have had lots of these granulomas.. and the pain from them. IMO, they may be caused by chronic exposure to some mycotoxins, but that's not something most doctors are going to look for, partly because it is SO disturbing. However, with the new exposure data from Straus and others (like the levels described in the paper Joe mentioned the other day) they REALLY need to be considering that possibility. If that's the case, these granulomas ARE, not " may be " - ARE the incontrovertable, unassailable proof that the exposure to them in the indoor environment people are getting IS CAUSING SERIOUS SERIOUS SERIOUS DAMAGE TO PEOPLE.... " e. Sarcoidosis can be mistakenly diagnosed for other known causes of granulomatous inflammation and other chronic lung diseases. The differential diagnosis includes hypersensitivity pneumonitis, mycobacterial infection, fungal infection, beryllium exposure, and exposure to metal dusts or organic antigens. Therefore, additional tests need to be considered when noncaseating granulomas are found by a biopsy including: (1) Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies for Wegener's granulomatosis, (2) Anti-mitochondrial antibodies for primary biliary cirrhosis, (3) Serologic and skin tests for fungal infections, (4) Sputum culture for mycobacteria, and (5) Beryllium lymphocyte proliferation test for beryllium exposure. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2007 Report Share Posted July 12, 2007 I dont think sarcoidosis or neurosarcoidosis would be a misdiagnoses at all. WTC and Katrina may be proving its exposure to high amounts or long term at lower amounts to irritants and toxins, differentails may just be part of that exposure. irritants(mold included) and toxins damage the mucosa and cause oxidative stress which damage the tissue. asthma is a chronic infection/inflamation in the lungs, after exposure and damage is done that damaged tissue and granulomas can be at a certain level of inflamation constantly and wouldn't take much to bring on infection. maybe with advoidance, some damaged tissue become fibrotic. now even if someone gets this damage without exposure to ubfectious agents you can bet those agents will become problematic in there lives afterwards. example: those diagnosed with tb, whos to say they didn't aquire after the fact of sarcoidosis? or maybe it was part of their exposure to many things. nothings going to be cut and dry here. theres some cery interesting research thats been many from the navy on this. think ships,water,mold/mycotoxins. did you catch the sentence in there stateing that educators(as in teachers) also get this disease? thinking it's in this one, if not I have the one that states it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.